Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/24/2013 8:06:57 AM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Rusty0604

We no longer own our property. They can take it at will and pay us nothing, and if we don’t pay our annual rent payment, well.. They will take it then to.


2 posted on 10/24/2013 8:08:23 AM PDT by cableguymn (The founding fathers would be shooting by now..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rusty0604

Getting more tax money for the greater good? Seems like the City is trying to stick it to the man; except the City is the man, so they’re sticking it to themselves.


3 posted on 10/24/2013 8:09:00 AM PDT by toolman1401
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rusty0604
Time for Joni Mitchell to sing a new song.

"They paved my parking lot and put up another parking lot"

4 posted on 10/24/2013 8:13:27 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (Everyone get online for Obamacare on 10/1. Overload the system and crash it hard!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rusty0604
Was the property owner behind on the taxes? Did the city seize the property or pay for the property? Either way,I think there are parking meters coming very soon to this parking lot.
5 posted on 10/24/2013 8:16:13 AM PDT by 4yearlurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rusty0604

Bump


7 posted on 10/24/2013 8:24:01 AM PDT by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rusty0604
103-year-old owner

Probably getting around the old guy believing he's not capable to defend himself.

Looks like a good opportunity for some young lawyer to get some fame.

11 posted on 10/24/2013 8:30:38 AM PDT by OldNavyVet ("Learn from science that you must doubt the experts" ... Richard Feynman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rusty0604

Liberal dim-bulb-crats...er...dim-bulb-crooks, no doubt.

Afraid it’s gonna take Revolution II to get rid of these folks.

And I mean GET RID of them.

Please start building the guillotine - there will be plenty of volunteers to pull the handle.

And we can sell photos.....


12 posted on 10/24/2013 8:31:03 AM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rusty0604

Seattle is the only town in the world where I have ever seen people urinating in the gutter openly.


13 posted on 10/24/2013 8:31:23 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rusty0604

Pure theft


14 posted on 10/24/2013 8:32:37 AM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rusty0604

After the reset, we need to put “eminent domain” on the Naughty List along with “Ex Post Facto” law, “Bills of Attainder”, and “Corruption of Blood”.

Also, “Adverse Possession”, which means that if you tress pass on another’s property long enough, you can call it yours.


16 posted on 10/24/2013 8:36:18 AM PDT by ExGeeEye (It's been over 90 days; time to start on 2014. Carpe GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rusty0604; Just Lori; Libertina; Lexinom; horatio; freebird5850; Horatio Gates; Ramius; ...
WA Ping

Government knows no bounds when coupled with a strong liberal majority.

18 posted on 10/24/2013 8:42:16 AM PDT by Baynative (Give me coffee to change the things I can and wine to accept those that I can't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rusty0604

Can’t find the thread but I saw it a couple of years ago where the property seized through the Kelo Decision now sits vacant.


19 posted on 10/24/2013 8:42:46 AM PDT by Hillarys Gate Cult (Liberals make unrealistic demands on reality and reality doesn't oblige them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rusty0604

Gov’t will take organs by FORCE for Congresswomen
and their staff. BY FORCE and without consent
because of failure to pay “fines” to the Tyrant.

SCOTUS already approved it for real estate,
and for mere whim.


20 posted on 10/24/2013 8:44:57 AM PDT by Diogenesis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rusty0604

In other words they are simply taking it because they want it. I sure hope this doesn’t hold up in court.


22 posted on 10/24/2013 8:59:24 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (From time to time the.tree of liberty must be watered with the blood of tyrants and patriots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rusty0604

40 or 50 years ago, Richmond, Va. did the same thing to the owner of a bridge. The owner charged at toll. So the first thing the govt did was double the toll.


23 posted on 10/24/2013 9:29:37 AM PDT by fini
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rusty0604

What this really means is that there is no private property. It’s an illusion. We only think that we own something, because we have to pay taxes on it, buy insurance, maintain it, and take the financial responsibility for it.

But it’s not really ours. It belongs to the collectivity, and the USA is already 60% communist.


25 posted on 10/24/2013 9:38:42 AM PDT by I want the USA back (Media: completely irresponsible traitors. Complicit in the destruction of our country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rusty0604

I have a little dilemma of my own going on here in Whatcom County. We are in the midst of a county council election which could settle the question of the approval of the coal terminal at Cherry Point.

The Republicans, who now dominate the council, are at risk of losing every seat because they have chosen to support the terminal. They rammed through the approval without allowing any discussions of the negative impacts of the terminal on residents near the terminal or along the tracks. They didn’t allow one word to be spoken against the project. Part of the problem is that the Whatcom County Republicans (and some of our state Rs, also) are too beholden to the unions, foolishly believing that if they support union issues, the unions will support Republicans.

So, as the Republicans in Whatcom county are on the verge of losing every single seat in Whatcom County, they have decided to try to bring water issues to the forefront at the last minute, claiming, and rightfully so, that Democrats plan to limit water rights in the rural areas of the county and that voters are foolish to put so much emphasis on the coal terminal.

The problem is that the Republicans support a huge daily allocation of water to the coal terminal, ahead of the water needs of the rural farmers and residents.

Who do you trust? I don’t want a coal terminal in my back yard, with huge open coal piles and no effort to control the fugitive coal dust.


28 posted on 10/24/2013 10:00:20 AM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson