Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CHART: Check Out How The Age At Which People First Get Married Is Soaring
Business Insider ^ | Oct 27, 2013 | Joe Weisenthal

Posted on 10/27/2013 8:03:20 AM PDT by Kip Russell

Here's a fascinating chart that probably comports with what you're seeing in real life.

The age at which people are first getting married is soaring. (Via John Podhoretz).

The jump in the last decade is particularly notable.

There are various theories for why people are getting married later, but one notion has to do with cultural attitudes towards marriage, and the growing perception that marriage is a "capstone" of life achievements, rather than a cornerstone.


(Excerpt) Read more at businessinsider.com ...


TOPICS: Society
KEYWORDS: 68revolution; communistgoals; culturewar; idiocracy; marriage; moralabsolutes; sexpositiveagenda; sexualrevolution; singleparents; smashmonogamy; smashthepatriarchy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last
To: freeandfreezing

I turned 23 in 1967. By then I had had an honorable discharge from the USN for two years, I had a graduation certificate from the USN electronics school which was 38 weeks of intensive study. I had a job earning $110. a week which was easily more money than $1100. a week is now in real terms. I was driving a new car which I bought for myself. I was actually living with my parents but I was helping support them, not vice versa. Was I considered a success? No, in my area I was considered a failure because I did not already have a wife and at least one child. It may have been different in some places but the attitude where I lived was that any male who was still single after his 22nd birthday, unless he was enrolled in higher education, was worthless and no account, one woman where I worked actually asked me what was wrong with me that I was 23 years old and not married. I finally married just after turning 28 and by then everyone was dumbstruck because they had decided I would never marry.


21 posted on 10/27/2013 9:29:43 AM PDT by RipSawyer (The TREE currently falling on you actually IS worse than a Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Kip Russell

Free milk and a cow.


22 posted on 10/27/2013 9:31:37 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: James C. Bennett
Yes, the evidence is in the illegitimacy rate.

It is huge, but heavily clustered in a few cultural groups.

23 posted on 10/27/2013 9:34:11 AM PDT by Texas Fossil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Texas Fossil

It’s actually widespread across all cultural groups, with some of them having spikes high enough to make the others look better.


24 posted on 10/27/2013 9:40:37 AM PDT by James C. Bennett (An Australian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: James C. Bennett

Agree


25 posted on 10/27/2013 9:42:18 AM PDT by Texas Fossil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: gorush
Bigamy is having one wife too many. Monogamy is the same.

Oscar Wilde

26 posted on 10/27/2013 9:48:21 AM PDT by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: James C. Bennett

Recent data graph:

http://img683.imageshack.us/img683/928/birthsunmarried.png

Comments about recent trends:

https://hailtoyou.wordpress.com/2010/12/30/share-of-births-to-unmarried-mothers-by-race-1990-2010/


27 posted on 10/27/2013 9:51:15 AM PDT by Texas Fossil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: gorush
There are three rings in a marriage--

The engagement ring.

The Wedding Ring.

And the suffer-ring.

28 posted on 10/27/2013 10:05:34 AM PDT by Defiant (GOPe Strategy: We have to fund Obamacare in order to see how bad it is. Good idea, guys!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GreaterSwiss

The key is to marry when you are both young and don’t have much — build a life together and not these “parallel tracks” that I see for so many of the younger couples. Essentially, this is saying that there is little trust of the marriage surviving over the long haul, so always be prepared to split.

Would like to see this same chart with the ages people started living together before they married - how many actually did get married that lived together? That’s a phenomenon that was pretty rare pre-1970’s (unless people who were doing it were under the radar and not talking about it).


29 posted on 10/27/2013 10:09:20 AM PDT by Sioux-san
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: fhayek
Bigamy is having one wife too many. Monogamy is the same. Oscar Wilde

Figures that's how a homo would feel about marriage.

30 posted on 10/27/2013 10:11:05 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
I knew someone would mention that.
31 posted on 10/27/2013 10:20:20 AM PDT by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Kip Russell
I think it's economics as much as anything. The upturn in the graph pretty much coincides with the loss of purchasing power over the last four decades. Young people just don't think they can afford to get married. Notice how the increase leveled off during the Clinton years, when the economy was booming before the dot-com bust?

Of course, the "sexual revolution" has a lot to do with it to - people can have sex and live together without the former social stigma.
32 posted on 10/27/2013 10:31:46 AM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gorush

Those are very funny !


33 posted on 10/27/2013 10:35:05 AM PDT by Mears (Liberalism is the art of being easily offended.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LibertyOh

Yes, and that puts it in the proper perspective. Of course, it could mean to burn with passion / lust than to burn in fire? I think fire.


34 posted on 10/27/2013 11:08:54 AM PDT by Sequoyah101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Sequoyah101

Another reason: The intense pressure to have the fairy tale grand Fortune 500 wedding and put your parents out thousands of dollars ...only to divorce two years later.

Seen it over and over. My own daughter feels she can’t marry yet, for one, because WE are not financially ready to cover her wedding . . . or at least the type of wedding she thinks she needs to have.

Kids nowadays have talked themselves into believing that conditions must all be right BEFORE they get married. We got married BEFORE conditions were right. They still aren’t right. We just experience it together.

Part of me regrets marrying so young ...but we’ve grown up together ..and we continue to reap the rewards of being together over 25 years.


35 posted on 10/27/2013 11:18:17 AM PDT by LibsRJerks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Kip Russell

Notice how, through til the 1960’s, the spread between the male and female age was about 2.5 to 3.5 years, then it narrows to under 1.5?

Up until the 1960’s, it was the norm for the wife to stay home. Now, they both need to be in the labor force, and preferably both need to be college graduates in order to sustain a middle-class standard of living. This means having to delay marriage until after college and after some time to be established in a career.


36 posted on 10/27/2013 11:18:45 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Mr & Mrs Guru photo MrMrsGuru.gif

Help FR Continue the Conservative Fight!
Your Monthly and Quarterly Donations
Help Keep FR In the Battle!

Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!


37 posted on 10/27/2013 11:28:23 AM PDT by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: LibsRJerks

A Jewish friend said to me thusly,

“Weddings are so expensive because they have to make two people happy & fulfilled: the bride and the bride’s mother.”

;^)


38 posted on 10/27/2013 2:13:39 PM PDT by elcid1970 ("In the modern world, Muslims are living fossils.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: RipSawyer
Your point about earning $110 a week as a young man and its relative worth today is very important. I too remember working back around then and there was a big difference in purchasing power for the money you earned in the late 60s and 70s and what kids face today.

In the 70s I rented an apartment for $425 per month when you could earn around $7.00 to $8.00 per hour painting. Today the painters job may fetch $15 to $20 per hour, but the same apartment rents for $3500 per month. Hard to make that rent without a way more lucrative job.

39 posted on 10/27/2013 2:19:36 PM PDT by freeandfreezing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Kip Russell

Boy I am not seeing this in my neck of the woods. The Christian homeschool crowd is marrying in their 18 to 26 years and popping out babies. Lots of babies.


40 posted on 10/27/2013 2:31:52 PM PDT by Chickensoup (we didn't love freedom enough... Solzhenitsyn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson