Posted on 12/05/2013 7:46:45 AM PST by Cringing Negativism Network
So Bashir resigned, was that in lieu of being fired? Who says Sarah isn’t a powerful conservative woman.
Tonight on MSNBC Chrissy will be doing this for the LY’NG King.
Chrissy will explain to the LIV that(ACA), it’s “just rain”!
The left usually gets away with doing what they do best - destroying good people that they disagree with.
Thing is, the harder they hiy her, the stronger she gets, the more popular she becomes, the more appearances she has, and the more money she makes.
They don’t get it.
About damn time the networks started doing something about those who insult Sarah Palin.
I make a point of never again watching networks that allow this and I hope others do the same. Tell their sponsors too. If we ALL did this, something would be done (and yes I DO complain).
In an odd way, I “do” have a use for those who bash Palin. Not in regards to libs, but to those ‘ostensibly’ on our own side. Palin has proven to be a very valuable barometer. Her presence has managed to smoke out endless columnists, politicians, etc., who ostensibly purport to be conservative, but in the end prove to be beholden to the corrupt, big-spending, pro-amnesty, establishment-GOP system. Whether via a snarky comment or a subtle eye-roll directed towards Palin, it’s often been the first clue that said conservative is a phony.
Well, put your way, I must agree!
:)
Of course, Sarah Palin isn’t REALLY a woman, just like Ben Carson and Alan West aren’t REALLY black.
Bump post 26. Excellent observation.
“Like”.
Martin Bash-her is out of a job.
Another pelt for the Lady from Alaska.
President No. 45.
We have a lot of freepers that belong to the "I like Sara Palin, but......" club.
Sarah is a lady and as always a class act.
Thanks for the ping and post.
It is a character thing, Men and women of character do not need to make debasing comments about any one of either gender.
we dissect their opinions and show them in clear uncompromising language why they are wrong.
There is never a need to resort to personal attacks or make ad hominem comments.
bump!
That's my primary litmus test for getting new acquaintances to expose themselves. Nothing else works so effectively.
Just casually mention the name "Sarah Palin" in a conversation, and their facial expression alone will show whether they are a decent person, or something else driven by evil.
This sentence shows great insight from Sarah:
“As I’ve said before, the target of the attack is usually more significant than what the attack, the articulated words used, actually are and that’s part of that double standard.”
It is saying the target of the attacks—conservative women—is the real double standard. Liberal women get a free pass for what they say if it falls in line with the Communist script. Why? These watch dogs of the media are the watch dogs for the socialist state that is being formed to enslave America. They do not want the true nature of the transformation to be expressed and will shut down anyone who voices the truth.
Why are women put under the gun like slaves? Because women transfer most of the culture to the children. The State does not want women to oppose their objective—to step out of line. Women are to be compliant little cheerleaders that cheer on the party line. The state is in the process of transforming the children of our society to the ideology of Communism. They don’t want any interference.
I remember nobody suspended David Letterman for musing out loud that he would like it if A-Rod raped Sarah Palins 14 year old daughter. He questioned whether Sarah or Bristol
was the mother of Trig.
Sarah is a fine woman who deserves for us to pelt these liberal pigs with rotten tomatoes.
And Howard Cosell.....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.