Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Swedish royalty anchor baby?
1 posted on 01/13/2014 4:25:25 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: nickcarraway

Ages of socialized medicine in Sweden have likely resulted in sub par hospitals.


2 posted on 01/13/2014 4:26:48 PM PST by drbuzzard (All animals are created equal, but some are more equal than others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: annalex; a fool in paradise; Slings and Arrows

Royalist PING!


3 posted on 01/13/2014 4:26:54 PM PST by Revolting cat! (Bad things are wrong! Ice cream is delicious!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

If only ALL the anchor babies were Swedish...


4 posted on 01/13/2014 4:29:52 PM PST by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
"Swedish royalty anchor baby? "Weird. Why not in Cuba? Zimbabwe? Zurich?
5 posted on 01/13/2014 4:30:08 PM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
Swedish royalty anchor baby?

We need more of those.

6 posted on 01/13/2014 4:30:10 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
it is simply more convenient to give birth there than in Sweden

BS!!

A high-risked delivery is more likely to result in a successful outcome for mother and child in the US. For now - BOcare will being us down to the 3rd world level!

7 posted on 01/13/2014 4:30:20 PM PST by KosmicKitty (WARNING: Hormonally crazed woman ahead!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Why can’t she have DHL deliver it?


10 posted on 01/13/2014 4:32:30 PM PST by exit82 ("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
"She has had a tough pregnancy, she missed the Nobel banquette for example, and it is simply more convenient to give birth there than in Sweden," he said.

I guess they are coming to the US to take advantage of America’s subpar health system (according to the Liberals in this country and abroad).

Well the US has the best hospitals in the world but these royals should not get used to coming here for excellent medicine because the Democrats are hard at work bringing the US down to their level.

12 posted on 01/13/2014 4:33:58 PM PST by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway; a fool in paradise

Is John Roberts trying to adopt another one ahead of forthcoming Obamacare challenges?


14 posted on 01/13/2014 4:34:55 PM PST by Revolting cat! (Bad things are wrong! Ice cream is delicious!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Hedging their bets for the 2056 US presidential election.


17 posted on 01/13/2014 4:39:19 PM PST by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

if you believe those that say 0bama was/is eligible under A2S1, then their child could be eligible to become POTUS.

at that point, a Queen of a foreign country could also be POTUS... which is EXACTLY the situation the founders were looking to avoid by inserting the phrase ‘natural born citizen’ into the Constitution

this is just another example why 0bama supporters and anti-birthers are full of sh*t


18 posted on 01/13/2014 4:40:04 PM PST by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Actually, the INA covers diplomats and royalty. They can’t drop an anchor baby. They are the exception to the jus soli laws.


27 posted on 01/13/2014 4:56:05 PM PST by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

We’re all anchor babies now.


29 posted on 01/13/2014 4:56:26 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Who knew that one day professional wrestling would be less fake than professional journalism?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Well at least they won’t be signing up for welfare and trying to bring the rest of their impoverished family with them. :-)


31 posted on 01/13/2014 4:57:29 PM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway; a fool in paradise
I hate the Swedish accent!


33 posted on 01/13/2014 4:58:59 PM PST by Revolting cat! (Bad things are wrong! Ice cream is delicious!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
Princess Madeleine photo:  attachment-2.jpg

Not guilty.

35 posted on 01/13/2014 5:01:53 PM PST by Snickering Hound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

The new child will be forced to file US tax returns the rest of her life - even if sh leaves and never returns.


39 posted on 01/13/2014 5:05:44 PM PST by aMorePerfectUnion (Truth is hate to those who hate the Truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
Princess Madeleine and her husband Christopher O'Neil have decided that their child will be born in the US, the Swedish Royal Court has announced.

So the royal tyke will be a US Citizen since it was dropped on US soil.
53 posted on 01/13/2014 5:38:01 PM PST by Cheerio (Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

I went to the site and looked at the prior article about her going to the Nobel awards by herself. It seems that her husband works here and they live in NYC. So, this decision makes sense and implies nothing really about either her health or her feelings for Sweden; which I’m sure are warm and patriotic as would be appropriate for a Princess. And I hope her health is excellent and all goes well for her and her baby.


54 posted on 01/13/2014 5:49:17 PM PST by jocon307
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Too dangerous to use socialized medicine?


61 posted on 01/13/2014 6:31:06 PM PST by RetiredTexasVet (It's difficult to differentiate between a hog calling contest and a Senate rollcall.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson