Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Who Owns The Federal Reserve?
Market Oracle, UK ^ | 9 February 2014 | Ellen_Brown

Posted on 02/09/2014 7:58:51 AM PST by Errant

The Federal Reserve (or Fed) has assumed sweeping new powers in the last year. In an unprecedented move in March 2008, the New York Fed advanced the funds for JPMorgan Chase Bank to buy investment bank Bear Stearns for pennies on the dollar. The deal was particularly controversial because Jamie Dimon, CEO of JPMorgan, sits on the board of the New York Fed and participated in the secret weekend negotiations.1 In September 2008, the Federal Reserve did something even more unprecedented, when it bought the world’s largest insurance company. The Fed announced on September 16 that it was giving an $85 billion loan to American International Group (AIG) for a nearly 80% stake in the mega-insurer. The Associated Press called it a “government takeover,” but this was no ordinary nationalization. Unlike the U.S. Treasury, which took over Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac the week before, the Fed is not a government-owned agency. Also unprecedented was the way the deal was funded. The Associated Press reported:

“The Treasury Department, for the first time in its history, said it would begin selling bonds for the Federal Reserve in an effort to help the central bank deal with its unprecedented borrowing needs.”2

This is extraordinary. Why is the Treasury issuing U.S. government bonds (or debt) to fund the Fed, which is itself supposedly “the lender of last resort” created to fund the banks and the federal government? Yahoo Finance reported on September 17:

“The Treasury is setting up a temporary financing program at the Fed’s request. The program will auction Treasury bills to raise cash for the Fed’s use. The initiative aims to help the Fed manage its balance sheet following its efforts to enhance its liquidity facilities over the previous few quarters.”

(Excerpt) Read more at marketoracle.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Conspiracy; History; Society
KEYWORDS: congress; currency; fed; treasury
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last
To: Unknowing

That’s basically the way my cousin described it, but he didn’t know about the family function. JP sent around 50 people in over the weekend to value it - it was in horrible shape - which was why the initial offer was so low compared to the price it was trading at.

The point is that the Fed pretty much ordered JP to buy Bear Stearns - and JP didn’t want to. The Fed got their way - JP paid back all of the loan the Fed forced them to take.


41 posted on 02/09/2014 10:22:49 AM PST by dynoman (Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marylin vos Savant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

I think you are finally hearing the rest of the story - why that chart looks like it does.


42 posted on 02/09/2014 10:23:56 AM PST by dynoman (Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marylin vos Savant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Rockingham
A further complication is that during the crisis of 2008, the Fed issued an $85 billion line of credit to keep AIG afloat and secured that line of credit by warrants for just under 80% of the company’s stock.

The Treasury (TARP) got the stock, not the Fed.

43 posted on 02/09/2014 10:25:18 AM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Science is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: dynoman
The chart looks like it does because it would have gone bankrupt if the feds hadn't twisted JPMs arm to buy them.

Finally? LOL! I knew it real time.

44 posted on 02/09/2014 10:27:22 AM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Science is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

I think that the Federal Reserve Bank of New York held the government’s interest in AIG.


45 posted on 02/09/2014 10:44:27 AM PST by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Rockingham

http://projects.propublica.org/bailout/entities/8-aig


46 posted on 02/09/2014 10:51:56 AM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Science is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

Getting even deeper into the weeds, the NY Fed Bank website details a series of transactions. Initially, the NY Fed holdings of AIG assets pledged as collateral were held in a trust for the benefit of the US Treasury, with later transactions having the NY Fed gradually turn them over to the Treasury or otherwise releasing them back to AIG and its successors. In any event, the economic reality is that the Fed provided the cash and structured the transactions for its convenience.


47 posted on 02/09/2014 11:03:14 AM PST by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Rockingham

The Fed lent, the Treasury bought stock.


48 posted on 02/09/2014 11:07:39 AM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Science is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Errant
"Joe, who own the Federal Reserve?"

"Owns...Owns."

49 posted on 02/09/2014 11:10:48 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
your post 23 reply to me makes it look like you didn't know it in real time:

"That was Bear Stearns, trading at $2, bought for $10 a share. "

It wasn't "trading at $2, bought for $10". It was trading at 30, the Fed ordered JP to buy it, JP valued it at 2 and bought it for 10 so they wouldn't look like vultures in the eyes of the public.


50 posted on 02/09/2014 11:25:21 AM PST by dynoman (Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marylin vos Savant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: All

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bear_Stearns


51 posted on 02/09/2014 11:26:15 AM PST by dynoman (Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marylin vos Savant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Unknowing

Interesting article, I was wrong about 50 JP employees checking out Bear that weekend, it was 150:

“The deal followed a weekend of frantic negotiations to save the ailing firm. With the Fed and Treasury Department patched in by conference call from Washington, Bear Stearns executives held the equivalent of a speed-dating auction over the weekend, with prospective bidders holed up in a half dozen conference rooms at its Madison Avenue headquarters. More than 150 JPMorgan employees descended on Bear Stearns to examine the firm’s books and trading accounts.

Even as those talks took place, Bear Stearns simultaneously prepared to file for bankruptcy protection in the event a deal could not be struck, underscoring the severity of its troubles.

On Sunday night, Jamie Dimon, the chief executive of JPMorgan, held a conference call with the heads of major American financial companies to alert them to the deal and allay their concerns about doing business with Bear Stearns.

“JPMorgan Chase stands behind Bear Stearns,” Mr. Dimon said in a statement. “Bear Stearns’s clients and counterparties should feel secure that JPMorgan is guaranteeing Bear Stearns’s counterparty risk. We welcome their clients, counterparties and employees to our firm, and we are glad to be their partner.” While Bear Stearns toyed with suitors like big private equity firms like the J.C. Flowers & Company, the only meaningful bidder was JPMorgan.

The deal is a major coup for Mr. Dimon, who slept only a handful of hours over the weekend while negotiating with Bear and government officials. Over the last few years, he has focused intensely on cutting costs, improving technology and integrating JPMorgan’s disparate operations. But he also has been adamant about preparing the company for an economic downturn. “

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/17/business/17bear.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0


52 posted on 02/09/2014 11:32:09 AM PST by dynoman (Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marylin vos Savant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: dynoman
It wasn't "trading at $2, bought for $10". It was trading at 30, the Fed ordered JP to buy it, JP valued it at 2

Traded as low as $2.84. Stock holders stomped their feet, threatened to vote against the deal, JPM upped their bid to $10.

53 posted on 02/09/2014 11:36:41 AM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Science is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Errant

Bump for later.


54 posted on 02/09/2014 11:38:53 AM PST by Lurkina.n.Learnin (This is not just stupid, we're talking Democrat stupid here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
Not for more than a day, that's how fast the Fed and JP moved. The last day on the chart I posted was March 14,2008, by Monday Bear no longer existed;

"11: March 14, 2008 JPMorgan, backed by the Federal Reserve, provides an undisclosed amount of emergency financing to Bear Stearns. Bear says its liquidity position had deteriorated dramatically in the previous 24 hours. The stock plunges to close at $30.85. The average target price: $93.62.

12: March 16 & 17, 2008 JPMorgan agrees on March 16 to buy Bear for $236 million, or $2 a share, representing just over 1 percent of the firm’s value at its record high close just 14 months earlier. The deal essentially marks the end of Bear’s 85-year run as an independent securities firm. Bear shares end March 17, a Monday, at $4.81 on optimism another buyer may emerge. The average target price: $2."

JP owned Bear on March 17.
55 posted on 02/09/2014 11:45:04 AM PST by dynoman (Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marylin vos Savant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
Take a look at the original credit agreement, which was solely between the NY Fed Bank and AIG and without the Treasury as a party.
56 posted on 02/09/2014 12:17:13 PM PST by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Errant

Bfl


57 posted on 02/09/2014 12:20:38 PM PST by citizen (There is always free government cheese in the mouse trap.....https://twitter.com/kracker0)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dynoman

The stock traded through May.


58 posted on 02/09/2014 12:42:30 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Science is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Rockingham

Yes, that was before TARP.


59 posted on 02/09/2014 12:53:21 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Science is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
He thinks banks create money out of thin air.

Idiot. It's created out of thin air by the Federal Reserve

 

 

 

How the Federal Reserve Creates Money

You can find pages and pages of explanations for the creation of money by the Federal Reserve. By the time you are done wading through it all you will be just as confused and in the dark as when you started. However if you start with a the basic premise that,

  1. it isn't rocket science.
  2. it's created out of thin air.
  3. it's not done to protect the wealth or security of the common citizen.

Then it gets pretty simple pretty quickly.

The typical way money is created by the FOMC – The short form

It's a simple four-step process.

  1. The FOMC first approves the purchase of US government bonds on the 'open market'. [When the government is short of funds, the Treasury issues bonds and delivers them to independent bond dealers, which auction them off.}
  2. When the FED wants to "expand the money supply'"i.e. create money the New York Fed bank buys these government bonds from the independent securities dealers (financial markets always have an equal number of buyers and sellers).
  3. The Fed pays for its purchases with electronic credits to the sellers' banks, which, in turn, credit the sellers' bank accounts. These credits are literally created out of nothing.
  4. The banks receiving the credits use them as reserves and loan out several times the amount of the money held in reserve due to the magic of fractional reserve banking. If their reserve requirement is 10% then 10 times the money put into reserve can be loaned out. The banks can create new loans because of these increased reserves. As the money is loaned the money supply in the U.S. increases.

Or a short and simple way to look at it is:

"The Federal Reserve uses open-market operations to either increase or decrease reserves. To increase reserves, the Federal Reserve buys U.S. Treasury securities by writing a check drawn on itself. The seller of the Treasury security deposits the check in a bank, increasing the seller's deposit. The bank, in turn, deposits the Federal Reserve check at its district Federal Reserve bank, thus increasing its reserves" [ 1 ] When a bnak increases it's reserves it can loan more money due to the magic of fracional reserve banking.

"When the Federal Reserve writes a check for a government bond it does exactly what any bank does, it creates money, it created money purely and simply by writing a check." [ 2 ]

Another way to create money

The FOMC can also change the reserve requirements for the banks. This allows banks to increase or decrease the loans it makes. Once again creating money from nothing.

And one more way to create money

The FED also loans money to banks for short periods of time. This is called the discount rate. If the discount rate is low enough then banks can borrow from the FED and loan the loan out to the bank's borrowers. in fact the bank can loan multiple times the FED loan out to borrowers due to the magic of fractional reserve banking.

 

60 posted on 02/09/2014 1:03:18 PM PST by dennisw (The first principle is to find out who you are then you can achieve anything -- Buddhist monk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson