Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ninth Circuit strikes California’s restrictive rule against licensed carry of handguns
The Washington Post ^ | 2/13/2014 | David Kopel

Posted on 02/13/2014 6:24:25 PM PST by Beave Meister

The Ninth Circuit’s decision in Peruta v. San Diego, released minutes ago, affirms the right of law-abiding citizens to carry handguns for lawful protection in public.

California law has a process for applying for a permit to carry a handgun for protection in public, with requirements for safety training, a background check, and so on. These requirements were not challenged. The statute also requires that the applicant have “good cause,” which was interpreted by San Diego County to mean that the applicant is faced with current specific threats. (Not all California counties have this narrow interpretation.) The Ninth Circuit, in a 2-1 opinion written by Judge O’Scannlain, ruled that Peruta was entitled to Summary Judgement, because the “good cause” provision violates the Second Amendment.

The Court ruled that a government may specify what mode of carrying to allow (open or concealed), but a government may not make it impossible for the vast majority of Californians to exercise their Second Amendment right to bear arms.

Eugene Volokh may be too modest to say so, but the Court cites him four times, to his articles Implementing the Right to Keep and Bear Arms for Self-Defense: An Analytical Framework and a Research Agenda, 56 UCLA L. Rev. 1443 (2009); and The First and Second Amendments, 109 Colum. L. Rev. Sidebar 97 (2009). I got one cite, for The Second Amendment in the Nineteenth Century, 1998 B.Y.U. L. Rev 1359 (1998). [Other modern scholars cited were Nelson Lund, Stephen Halbrook, Clayton Cramer, Joseph Olson, and Joyce Malcolm, all of whom are familiar to longtime VC readers.]

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial
KEYWORDS: banglist; beararms; california; ccw; concealandcarry; gunlaws; guns; judiciary; ninthcircuit; secondamendment; selfdefense; wapo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last
To: chrisinoc

That is only firearms that have passed California’s drop test. The new law now requires firing pin microstamping.

S&W and Ruger have said they will not comply and will not sell such firearms in Cali.


21 posted on 02/14/2014 1:25:52 PM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar (Sometimes you need 7+ more ammo. LOTS MORE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

Why wait? Unless you live in one of the open carry prohibited states like CA or TX or FL, you can do it today.


22 posted on 02/14/2014 3:15:02 PM PST by RKBA Democrat (Having some small say in who gets to hold the whip doesn't make you any less a slave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Beave Meister

The ninth displays sanity. Surprised but happy.


23 posted on 02/14/2014 4:55:31 PM PST by Carry me back
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson