Skip to comments.
Chrysler orders 93 rare, early Vipers to the crusher
Yahoo auto ^
| 03/05/14
| justin Hyde
Posted on 03/06/2014 1:17:21 PM PST by Doogle
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
buh-bye
1
posted on
03/06/2014 1:17:21 PM PST
by
Doogle
To: Chode
2
posted on
03/06/2014 1:18:13 PM PST
by
Doogle
(USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
To: Doogle
i predict a fire at that auto shop that “destroys” that viper.
3
posted on
03/06/2014 1:19:45 PM PST
by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: Doogle
4
posted on
03/06/2014 1:20:42 PM PST
by
steve86
(Some things aren't really true but you wouldn't be half surprised if they were.)
To: Doogle
If I held title to the vehicle, I’d tell Chrysler to get stuffed.
5
posted on
03/06/2014 1:22:32 PM PST
by
Arm_Bears
(Shoot cops that shoot dogs.)
To: Doogle
6
posted on
03/06/2014 1:24:05 PM PST
by
cripplecreek
(REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
To: Doogle
School: Seems we took that Viper out in a boat and had this horrific boating accident..............
7
posted on
03/06/2014 1:24:16 PM PST
by
Starstruck
(If my reply offends, you probably don't understand sarcasm or criticism...or do.)
To: Doogle
How do I go about becoming “conservator” of the SPCCC car? It sounds like it’d make a great track toy.
To: Doogle
Vipers remain one of the hardest to drive cars ever built. They are not comfortable and in the hands of a novice, they are even dangerous. Early Vipers had no stability control and barely adequate brakes.
If all you wanted to do was go real fast in a real hurry, then yeah. Viper.
But if you wanted a true Sports Car or a fast performance car? Then Vipers were not up for discussion.
That said - It’s stupid to even think of destroying these cars.
9
posted on
03/06/2014 1:26:26 PM PST
by
Responsibility2nd
(NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
To: Doogle
I think Dodge learned a valuable lesson when biker Billy Lane killed someone with one of their trucks.
10
posted on
03/06/2014 1:27:45 PM PST
by
liberalh8ter
(The only difference between flash mob 'urban yutes' and U.S. politicians is the hoodies.)
To: ZirconEncrustedTweezers
“It sounds like itd make a great track toy.”
Which is EXACTLY why Chrysler wants the cars crushed. One accident with a car that was never supposed to see the road has already cost them millions.
From their viewpoint, it just isn’t worth hundreds of millions in potential liability to keep these cars out there.
Welcome to the Litigious States of America, home of the Litigation Lottery.
11
posted on
03/06/2014 1:28:27 PM PST
by
tcrlaf
(Well, it is what the Sheeple voted for....)
To: Doogle
I wonder what the Fiat Viper is going to look like?
12
posted on
03/06/2014 1:28:43 PM PST
by
smokingfrog
( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
To: Doogle
School officials say Chrysler told them two of the 93 early Vipers given to schools had been involved in accidents by joyriding students, creating a major liability for Chrysler. Somehow this seems like it had an extremely high probability of happening. Can't imagine a better car for hooning than a Viper.
13
posted on
03/06/2014 1:30:23 PM PST
by
nascarnation
(I'm hiring Jack Palladino to investigate Baraq's golf scores.)
To: Doogle
School officials say Chrysler told them two of the 93 early Vipers given to schools had been involved in accidents by joyriding students, creating a major liability for Chrysler. Gee, you donate 93 Vipers to high school auto shop classes, and they find that students are joyriding in them? Shocking.
14
posted on
03/06/2014 1:32:46 PM PST
by
Yo-Yo
(Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
To: Doogle
Since Chrysler still owns them why not take possession of them and place them under their direct control, like in a museum. Crushing them is stupid.
15
posted on
03/06/2014 1:33:06 PM PST
by
Ray76
(How modern liberals think: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eaE98w1KZ-c)
To: Responsibility2nd
I was responsible for a number of the Early Vipers, for a short time.
It was damn near impossible to keep the tires from spinning when accelerating. My nightmare was that one of my employees would spin one into a pole, before they were no longer my problem.
Loved the car, but I was glad to see them go, when the event they were in my possession for was over. Luckily, no one wrecked one, not even the VIP’s.
16
posted on
03/06/2014 1:33:08 PM PST
by
tcrlaf
(Well, it is what the Sheeple voted for....)
To: Doogle
I’ve heard that the brute power combined with poor handling made the car difficult to drive.
17
posted on
03/06/2014 1:34:15 PM PST
by
MNnice
To: Arm_Bears
If you held the title they wouldn’t be telling you to crush it. These are cars they still own.
18
posted on
03/06/2014 1:36:09 PM PST
by
discostu
(I don't meme well.)
To: Doogle
We ordered one the first year and then 3 more years in a row and the dealer never could fill the order...even with a 25K Prepayment. So we kept the stealth for many years!
I thought I had missed something...maybe not!
19
posted on
03/06/2014 1:40:07 PM PST
by
3D-JOY
To: Doogle
....just a bad decade for older cars...first we had Odungo’s assault on the “clunker”...then the Corvette collection...now the vipers...
20
posted on
03/06/2014 1:40:39 PM PST
by
Doogle
(USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson