Posted on 03/09/2014 9:27:59 AM PDT by Signalman
The planet is not in danger of catastrophic man made global warming. Even if we burn all the worlds recoverable fossil fuels it will still only result in a temperature rise of less than 1.2 per cent.
So say The Right Climate Stuff Research Team, a group of retired NASA Apollo scientists and engineers the men who put Neil Armstrong on the moon in a new report.
Its an embarrassment to those of us who put NASAs name on the map to have people like James Hansen popping off about global warming, says the projects leader Hal Doiron.
Doiron was one of 40 ex NASA employees including seven astronauts who wrote in April 2012 to NASA administrator Charles Bolden protesting about the organizations promotion of climate change alarmism, notably via its resident environmental activist James Hansen.
During his stint as head of the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, Hansen tirelessly promoted Anthropogenic Global Warming theory. He retired last year to spend more time on environmental campaigning and has twice been arrested with former mermaid impersonator Darryl Hannah for his part in protests against surface coal mining and the Keystone XL pipe line. While still head of NASA GISS he once described trains carrying coal as death trains no less gruesome than if they were carrying boxcars headed to crematoria and loaded with uncountable irreplaceable species. Many NASA employees and former employees found his views an embarrassment.
Doiron and his team now hope to set the record straight in a report called Bounding GHG Climate Sensitivity For Use In Regulatory Decisions.
Using calculations by George Stegemeier of the National Academy of Engineering, they estimated the total quantity of recoverable oil, gas and coal on the planet. They then used 163 years of real world temperature data to calculate Transient Climate Sensitivity (ie how much the world will warm as a result of the emission of all the carbon dioxide in the fossil fuel). The figure they came up with 1.2 degrees C which is considerably lower than the wilder claims of the IPCC, whose reports have suggested it could be as high as 4 degrees C or more.
Doiron is similarly sceptical of the computer models used by climate alarmists. He and his team argue that the 105 models currently used by the IPCC are seriously flawed because they dont agree with each other and dont agree with empirical data.
Doiron says: I believe in computer models. My whole career was about using computer models to make life or death decisions. In 1963 I had to use them to calculate whether, when the lunar module landed on a 12 degree slope it would fall over or not and design the landing gear accordingly. But if you cant validate the models and the IPCC cant then dont use them.
the wording of the article is misleading and inaccurate:
” Even if we burn all the worlds recoverable fossil fuels it will still only result in a temperature rise of less than 1.2 per cent.”
It’s not a rise of 1.2 per cent, it’s a rise of 1.2 degrees.
Thus:
12° Celsius = 53.6° Fahrenheit
12° + 1.2° = 13.2°
13.2° Celsius = 55.76° Fahrenheit
and that would be the impact on the average global temperature after burning up “the total quantity of recoverable oil, gas and coal on the planet.”
So it’s easy to see why Doiron thinks Hansen is such an embarrassingly insufferable twit and his climate mumbo jumbo is so boneheaded.
Heck, I'm still trying to remember where I left my can of WD-40 yesterday!
B^)
perhaps the Most Important Mission Of All!
Thanks Signalman.
Great find Signalman
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.