Posted on 03/18/2014 2:03:00 PM PDT by Morgana
Lest there be any doubt, Amanda Marcotte really hates pro-lifers. In a two-part rant posted March 14 and 17 on Raw Story, the morally challenged feminist writer attacked pro-lifers as “consummate liars,” “anti-choice kooks” with “boring,” “half-baked nonsense” and “shit arguments.”
But Marcotte’s hate doesn’t stop at pro-lifers. It extends to the babies they want to protect.
amandamarcotte2“Either way, what she [the woman]wants trumps the non-existent desires of a mindless pre-person that is so small it can be removed in about two minutes during an outpatient procedure. Your cavities fight harder to stay in place.” Did she just compare an unborn child to a cavity?
Marcotte then goes on a seriously mature rant about the reasons she does not want a child: “ I don’t particularly like babies. They are loud and smelly and, above all other things, demanding. No matter how much free day care you throw at women, babies are still time-sucking monsters with their constant neediness.”
On the topic of adoption, Marcotte sums up her feelings simply: “Adoption? Fuck you, seriously.” That’s a heck of an argument.
Marcotte then argues against forced adoption, “forcing women to donate babies is reprehensible.” Wait, since when did the U.S. have required adoptions?
Abortion is a no-brainer choice for Marcotte: “This is why, if my birth control fails, I am totally having an abortion.” She calls a growing life to “a lentil-sized, brainless embryo that has half a chance of dying on its own anyway.”
Marcotte saved more snide remarks for conservatives in her follow-up piece on Mar. 17:
“Frankly, the more traditional, conservative argument against abortion—no, they’re not going to lift a finger to help you with your unwanted baby and you should have thought about that before fucking, you stupid slut who deserves to suffer—at least has the refreshing scent of honesty to it.”
Marcotte is a pro-abortion zealot who called Wendy Davis’s turn about in support of 20-week ban in Texas “a betrayal.” She’s called first trimester abortion a “relatively minor medical procedure that hardly merits the term “surgery,” Last year, she had no problem demonizing the NRA as the “domestic abuse lobby.” But abortion — the ultimate familial violence — is just swell.
how does amanda deal with the fact she was, and maybe still is, a time-sucking monster?
Amanda Marcotte rides again, and she’s still really, really stupid.
For those that don’t remember, Marcotte was the femi-blogger who made this jewel of a comment about the Duke lacrosse rape case (excerpted for profanity)”
“I had to listen [on CNN] to how the poor dear lacrosse players at Duke are being persecuted just because they held someone down and ****** her against her will—not rape, of course, because the charges have been thrown out. Can’t a few white boys sexually assault a black woman anymore without people getting all wound up about it? So unfair.”
So yeah, I’m not surprised she made the latest statements. Marcotte is basically the new Andrea Dworkin.
“Marcotte is basically the new Andrea Dworkin.”
Andrea Dworkin? More like an Andrea Dice Clay!
I’ll bet Amanda would be thankful her mother did not abort her when she was a “mindless pre-person” that was so small it could be removed in about two minutes during an outpatient procedure.
On a related point, it seems she’s still missing a part of her mind.
Guess she doesn’t think like her mom.
Gee. She wasn’t a baby once?
She's 36, and her sex partner works at the Center for Reproductive Rights. IMO, her biological clock has been surgically removed.
Drill sargeants have demonstrated that a willingness to attack the enemy even without a weapon, can be instilled in an 18 year-old male. However, having googled an image of Miss Marcotte, I believe no male has the courage to cause her to be in the market for an abortion.
she does not look that old.
Well, after reading this I think she is a time sucking monster...does this mean I get to dismember her with a pair of garden shears?
Time sucking monsters? Wow. The small, self-centered-ness is absolutely astounding.
Lady, you are killing a living human being. Nothing else need be said. Although it is legal, it is not moral. It is a perversion to reach into a woman’s womb and pull out a struggling baby and kill it. Anyone who would is void of conscience and feeling. They rely on Roe versus Wade as proof that they are doing nothing wrong. Harry Blackmun’s decision was terrible. It was devoid of logic. It was leaning toward secular humanism. Anyone who follows it is badly deluded.
I believe that hideous woman was employed for a brief time by John Edwards to work on his campaign blog.
Killing babies is the same as cavity removal? Really, cavities are not living beings.
If this blogger hates babies so much, she should abort herself..NOW..she can call it a late late late late abortion..I bet no one will miss her and I mean NO ONE
considering her approaching-hysterical rant about abortions in her attempt to convince others to join her behavior, I’d venture to say more than a few - that are deeply bothering her. Her stance towards adoption gives her away.
Using her logic: “Right, then, Amanda - I find you tedious. BLAM!”
A cavity is a hole. You can’t remove a hole.
Girl is so ugly birth control is the last thing she should be pondering.
That may be an older pic.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.