Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Samsung claims a ‘Massive’ Graphene Wafer breakthrough – Begins Prototype production of gFETs ....
wccftech.com ^ | 12:16 PM - 6 Apr 2014 | Syed Muhammad Usman Pirzada

Posted on 04/07/2014 11:23:16 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last
To: DManA
Just found this using:

...graphene transistors ibm circuits ....

IBM researchers just built the best graphene-based circuit yet: it sends text messages

41 posted on 04/07/2014 1:48:59 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Just my casual impression that in the past every story about graphene was a story about IBM research. Then out of the blue ( to me ) Samsung starts prototype production of a product.


42 posted on 04/07/2014 1:54:28 PM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: DManA
I found the article I posted....

IBM Demonstrates Graphene-Powered RF Processor.

43 posted on 04/07/2014 1:57:54 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

I remember wafers.. rows and rows of ‘em.. those wafer testers were a bugger sometimes.


44 posted on 04/07/2014 2:01:54 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi - Revolution is a'brewin!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Ray76; DManA
see #41 and 43.

The whole Globe has been working on researching Graphene.

45 posted on 04/07/2014 2:05:44 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer; Sherman Logan

See my uodates...links.


46 posted on 04/07/2014 2:08:46 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Incorrect. Not Area 51, Apollo 22.


47 posted on 04/07/2014 2:11:35 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty (H.L. Mencken: "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Good.


48 posted on 04/07/2014 2:25:11 PM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

Someone can correct me if I’m wrong but I think the Intel limitation is thermal. Faster clock rates increase dissipation so there is a natural practical limit to the clock speed.


49 posted on 04/07/2014 2:33:26 PM PDT by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Bobalu

Wow. Thanks much.


50 posted on 04/07/2014 2:41:58 PM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: All

Back later.


51 posted on 04/07/2014 2:43:25 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Bobalu

agreed

starting to get interesting

the real question then becomes, what do you do with it? games? analysis? simulators? monitoring? proper AI?

we’ll still have issues with storage being dead slow... unless this tech opens doors to new storage mediums that store one bit per molecule ... addressable? SSDs at a molecular level and at 500GHz speeds? storage and memory become the same


52 posted on 04/07/2014 2:59:23 PM PDT by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

“It’s becoming obvious mankind didn’t invent any of this stuff. This is clearly stuff being reverse-engineered from the Area 51 spacecraft.”

Along with Emacs and Lisp.

:-)


53 posted on 04/07/2014 3:26:06 PM PDT by PastorBooks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra
And it wasn’t that many years ago the electronic stuff from Samsung was considered the cheapest junk you could buy

The wife and I went almost exclusively Samsung in our home. Our first plasma TV was a Samsung. Our fridge, oven, microwave, washer, and dryer are all Samsung.

IIRC, in the early 2000s, they brought on a huge R&D group that was eventual absorbed into them, and they've been making amazing products since.

54 posted on 04/07/2014 4:54:28 PM PDT by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DManA

IBM is using graphene for development right now. Samsung’s been leading the industry in new tech stuff with graphene, and this is apparently some of their labor’s fruit.


55 posted on 04/07/2014 4:55:37 PM PDT by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
I would appreciate it if somebody more knowledgeable than me (a very large group) could explain how much this would speed processing up relative to existing systems.

SEVERAL orders of magnitude. At this point, they're just fiddling with the matrix, meaning the wafers that go into semiconductors. Once they start stacking them and applying current, look out!

The current standard is 22 nm for processors, for instance. There's a finite number of wafers that can be crammed into a 22 nm space, and we're getting around 4 GHz consistently on newer chips.

If their numbers are correct, 500 GHz over a platter would mean multi-core processors with hundreds if not thousands of "cores" all computing at several hundred gigahertz. That's just at a server/desktop hardware level, which would be considered "macro." The excitement is coming in the form of mobile and even microprocessing power where your current iPhone/Android could be shrunk in thickness down to that of a piece of paper with processing power much higher than currently available. Wearable tech is also a possibility.

56 posted on 04/07/2014 5:00:51 PM PDT by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Interesting article. Perhaps what Samsung is doing in this wafer fabrication process shall pane out nicely for them.


57 posted on 04/07/2014 6:30:01 PM PDT by Marine_Uncle (Galt level is not far away......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson