Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lesbian couple says baby’s baptism a sign Catholic views changing,want gay ‘marriage’ blessings
lifesitenews.com ^ | 04/08/2014 | GUALBERTO GARCIA JONES, J.D.

Posted on 04/08/2014 12:10:35 PM PDT by massmike

Fears that a public Catholic baptism ceremony for a Argentinean lesbian couple’s child would amount to little more than a media stunt to promote the Church's acceptance of homosexuality appear to have been borne out Saturday at the Archdiocese of Cordoba’s cathedral.

After the celebration of the sacrament, the couple, Karina Villarroel and Soledad Ortiz, kissed while posing for photos with the child, Umma Azul, at the front of the Church.

Villarroel, the non-biological “mother,” told local press the Catholic Church’s decision to grant the baptism was important “because it signifies that there is a real social change and acceptance" following the passage of the country's "marriage equality" law.

The final step, she said, would be “to be able to have the church consecrate their (gay) marriage, as right now it is only a civil marriage.”

Villarroel also explained that their decision to have Argentinean President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner as godmother was “a way of thanking her and ex-President Nestor Kirchner for the law which granted us our rights.” Kirchner, who was not present at the ceremony, was instrumental in the passage of same-sex “marriage” in 2010.

Critics of the archdiocese’s decision to proceed with the baptism have pointed to the Church’s Code of Canon Law, which says that for an infant to be baptized in the Catholic Church “there must be a founded hope that the infant will be brought up in the Catholic religion.”

The Catechism also clearly states, however, that “for the grace of Baptism to unfold, the parents' help is important. So too is the role of the godfather and godmother, who must be firm believers, able and ready to help the newly baptized - child or adult on the road of Christian life.”

(Excerpt) Read more at lifesitenews.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: accessory; homosexualagenda; lavendermafia; popefrancis; romancatholicism; waronchildren; waronreligion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: massmike
It's not the baby's fault that his/her mother (assuming one of them *is* the biological mother) is a pervert.These pigs can claim anything they want.They can claim that because they weren't stricken dead on the church's front steps Christ Himself weeps with joy when they do whatever they “do”.It doesn't make it true.
21 posted on 04/08/2014 1:18:35 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Stalin Blamed The Kulaks,Obama Blames The Tea Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike

Uh, people...........its Argentina! From what I’ve been reading, it appears only about 25% of the so-called “Catholics” in Argentina are.....Roman Catholic. Despite its appearance as a monolithic organization, the Roman Catholic Church as guided by “Rome”, has practically no control whatsoever over 50% of the so-called “Catholic” churches in South America. The other 50% are, from what I’ve seen, bizarre wack-job congregations with services that more resemble circus acts than actual Masses. Truly bizarre.


22 posted on 04/08/2014 1:21:17 PM PDT by Rich21IE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike

You cannot compromise or appease fascists

They take it as an admission of guilt and weakness and renew their attacks


23 posted on 04/08/2014 1:21:44 PM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike

The child is not the pervert. No reason to punish it.


24 posted on 04/08/2014 2:27:08 PM PDT by SECURE AMERICA (Where can I go to sign up for the American Revolution 2014 and the Crusades 2014?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

Withholding the Eucharist isn’t a punishment for sinful behavior. By denying it to a person in a state of mortal sin, the priest is protecting the sinner from committing a sacrilege. In most cases, the priest doesn’t know whether or not someone presenting themselves for communion has confessed and repented. In a high profile case like this one, I would think that he would and would do the right thing.


25 posted on 04/08/2014 3:07:26 PM PDT by al_c (Obama's standing in the world has fallen so much that Kenya now claims he was born in America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: fwdude
"There is no such thing as a “biological mother,” there is just a mother."

Well, sometimes that term is used to distinguish between the birth mother and an adoptive mother or a foster mother.

26 posted on 04/08/2014 3:37:01 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o ("The Holy Catholic Church: the more Holy she is, the more Catholic she is.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: al_c

Correct!!!

http://tinyurl.com/canon915
http://www.all.org/article/index/id/MTM1OTA/


27 posted on 04/08/2014 4:09:39 PM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: massmike
Pope Francis' response: "Who am I to judge?"
28 posted on 04/08/2014 5:13:13 PM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike

People in Hell want ice water.


29 posted on 04/08/2014 5:15:04 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike

I just love how these people think the Church is becoming more open minded and accepting of homosexuality by doing and saying things it has always said. You are loved by God, we all are. You are in serious sin if you act out on homosexuality. So the Church didn’t reject a baby for baptizing? What am I missing here? Baptizing a baby in the church has nothing to do with the serious immorality of the unwed sex partners and their dream to mock marriage and God.


30 posted on 04/08/2014 5:56:20 PM PDT by Phillyred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike

31 posted on 04/08/2014 9:57:56 PM PDT by Rodamala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick; GregB; Berlin_Freeper; SumProVita; narses; bboop; SevenofNine; Ronaldus Magnus; tiki; ...

Ping


32 posted on 04/09/2014 6:00:29 AM PDT by NYer ("You are a puff of smoke that appears briefly and then disappears." James 4:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike

no, the baby was baptized because it’s not his fault that his parents are living in sin. You can’t take it out on the baby because of the way the parents’ live.

The same goes for those heterosexuals who aren’t married and have children. If that’s going to be the case, then very few children will be baptized.


33 posted on 04/09/2014 6:57:59 PM PDT by Coleus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson