Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nixon's 'Southern Strategy' and a Liberal Big Lie
Human Events ^ | July 3rd, 2014 | Patrick J. Buchanan

Posted on 07/03/2014 11:38:36 PM PDT by ReformationFan

“For the first time since President Richard M. Nixon’s divisive ‘Southern strategy’ that sent whites to the Republican Party and blacks to the Democrats …” began a New York Times story last week.

Thus has one of the big lies of U.S. political history morphed into a cliche — that Richard Nixon used racist politics to steal the South from a Democratic Party battling heroically for civil rights. A brief stroll through Bruce Bartlett’s “Wrong on Race: The Democratic Party’s Buried Past” might better enlighten us.

Where Teddy Roosevelt invited Booker T. Washington to dinner, Woodrow Wilson re-segregated the U.S. government and had the pro-Klan film “Birth of a Nation” screened in his White House.

Wilson and FDR carried all 11 states of the Old Confederacy all six times they ran, when Southern blacks had no vote. Disfranchised black folks did not seem to bother these greatest of liberal icons.

As vice president, FDR chose “Cactus Jack” Garner of Texas who played a major role in imposing a poll tax to keep blacks from voting.

Among FDR’s Supreme Court appointments was Hugo Black, a Klansman who claimed FDR knew this when he named him in 1937 and that FDR told him that “some of his best friends” in Georgia were Klansmen.

Black’s great achievement as a lawyer was in winning acquittal of a man who shot to death the Catholic priest who had presided over his daughter’s marriage to a Puerto Rican.

In 1941, FDR named South Carolina Sen. “Jimmy” Byrnes to the Supreme Court. Byrnes had led filibusters in 1935 and 1938 that killed anti-lynching bills, arguing that lynching was necessary “to hold in check the Negro in the South.”

FDR refused to back the 1938 anti-lynching law.

“This is a white man’s country and will always remain a white man’s country,” said Jimmy. Harry Truman, who paid $10 to join the Klan, then quit, named Byrnes Secretary of State, putting him first in line of succession to the presidency, as Harry then had no V.P.

During the civil rights struggles of the ’50s and ’60s, Gov. Orval Faubus used the National Guard to keep black students out of Little Rock High. Gov. Ross Barnett refused to let James Meredith into Ole Miss. Gov. George Wallace stood in the door at the University of Alabama, to block two black students from entering.

All three governors were Democrats. All acted in accord with the “Dixie Manifesto” of 1956, which was signed by 19 senators, all Democrats, and 80 Democratic congressmen.

Among the signers of the manifesto, which called for massive resistance to the Brown decision desegregating public schools, was the vice presidential nominee on Adlai’s Stevenson’s ticket in 1952, Sen. John Sparkman of Alabama.

Though crushed by Eisenhower, Adlai swept the Deep South, winning both Carolinas, Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana and Arkansas.

Do you suppose those Southerners thought Adlai would be tougher than Ike on Stalin? Or did they think Adlai would maintain the unholy alliance of Southern segregationists and Northern liberals that enabled Democrats to rule from 1932 to 1952?

The Democratic Party was the party of slavery, secession and segregation, of “Pitchfork Ben” Tillman and the KKK. “Bull” Connor, who turned the dogs loose on black demonstrators in Birmingham, was the Democratic National Committeeman from Alabama.

And Nixon?

In 1956, as vice president, Nixon went to Harlem to declare, “America can’t afford the cost of segregation.” The following year, Nixon got a personal letter from Dr. King thanking him for helping to persuade the Senate to pass the Civil Rights Act of 1957.

Nixon supported the civil rights acts of 1964, 1965 and 1968.

In the 1966 campaign, as related in my new book “The Greatest Comeback: How Richard Nixon Rose From Defeat to Create the New Majority,” out July 8, Nixon blasted Dixiecrats “seeking to squeeze the last ounces of political juice out of the rotting fruit of racial injustice.”

Nixon called out segregationist candidates in ’66 and called on LBJ, Hubert Humphrey and Bobby Kennedy to join him in repudiating them. None did. Hubert, an arm around Lester Maddox, called him a “good Democrat.” And so were they all — good Democrats.

While Adlai chose Sparkman, Nixon chose Spiro Agnew, the first governor south of the Mason Dixon Line to enact an open-housing law.

In Nixon’s presidency, the civil rights enforcement budget rose 800 percent. Record numbers of blacks were appointed to federal office. An Office of Minority Business Enterprise was created. SBA loans to minorities soared 1,000 percent. Aid to black colleges doubled.

Nixon won the South not because he agreed with them on civil rights — he never did — but because he shared the patriotic values of the South and its antipathy to liberal hypocrisy.

When Johnson left office, 10 percent of Southern schools were desegregated. When Nixon left, the figure was 70 percent.

Richard Nixon desegregated the Southern schools, something you won’t learn in today’s public schools.

For history is a pack of lies agreed upon.

TOPICS: History
KEYWORDS: bookertwashington; buchanan; democraticparty; nixon; patbuchanan; patrickjbuchanan; racism; richardmilhousnixon; richardnixon; rmn; southernstrategy; teddyroosevelt; woodrowwilson

1 posted on 07/03/2014 11:38:37 PM PDT by ReformationFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan
when Southern blacks had no vote.

Gee, is Buchanan a liar much?

2 posted on 07/03/2014 11:51:50 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan

Good article about Democrats from the south...wish blacks would read this..

3 posted on 07/04/2014 4:07:28 AM PDT by ExCTCitizen (I'm ExCTCitizen and I approve this reply. If it does offend Libs, I'm NOT sorry...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan

Of course, the liberal globalist crowd will never acknowledge Buchanan, but he accurately summarizes the Democrats and their historical ties to racism

And the Dems continue to be racist...they replaced Hugo Black and Jimmy Byrnes with Al Sharpton and New Black Panthers

4 posted on 07/04/2014 4:17:17 AM PDT by DisorderOnBorder (Haley Barbour gave me $15 to vote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan

Pat Buchanan was with Richard Nixon all the way.

Nixon went down South in 1966 and all over the country to support the election of moderate RINO Republicans who were going to win quite a few elections because of a backlash against the Great Society welfare programs-Medicare (sort of like Obamacare backlash) and another backlash against racial violence. White voters were angrier and less sympathetic now that black rioting was becoming entrenched in major cities.

Buchanan was an aide and speechwriter.
Buchanan was Nixon’s liaison to conservatives.

Pat Buchanan helped RINO Nixon understand conservatives so he could speak the words that conservatives wanted to hear so Nixon could get their votes-support.

Buchanan and William Safire helped develop a conservative anti-news media message for Vice President Spiro Agnew, who was a Rockefeller Republican. Agnew became an attack dog for Nixon to draw in voters angry with a news media that took the side of the hippies and racial rioters.

5 posted on 07/04/2014 6:29:24 AM PDT by Nextrush (OBAMACARE IS A BAILOUT FOR THE HEALTHCARE INDUSTRY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Very few did in the South from the imposition of Jim Crow until the early 1960s. How is that a “lie” ?

6 posted on 07/04/2014 10:41:28 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj; nickcarraway
Very few did in the South from the imposition of Jim Crow until the early 1960s. How is that a “lie” ?

I lived in the south in the 50's, in my county not a single black voted mostly because there wasn't a single black living in my county.

7 posted on 11/04/2014 10:36:30 AM PST by itsahoot (Voting for a Progressive RINO is the same as voting for any other Tyrant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot

What county did you live in in the ‘50s that had nary a Black person there ?

8 posted on 11/04/2014 11:09:51 AM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
What county did you live in in the ‘50s that had nary a Black person there ?

Ottawa county, OK.

9 posted on 11/04/2014 5:04:20 PM PST by itsahoot (Voting for a Progressive RINO is the same as voting for any other Tyrant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot

It has a few, over 300 or so today. I’d have to see the 1950 demographics if it was truly Black-free. Of course, Ottawa does have a decent % of Native Americans, roughly 20%.

10 posted on 11/04/2014 5:37:31 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson