Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vasectomy can increase risk of developing lethal prostate cancer
Daily Telegraph (UK) ^ | 10:00PM BST 10 Jul 2014 | Laura Donnelly and Claire Carter

Posted on 07/11/2014 8:12:37 AM PDT by Olog-hai

Men who have a vasectomy face an increased chance of developing prostate cancer and a higher risk of contracting the most aggressive form of the disease, a study has found.

The Harvard research on 50,000 men, the largest study to examine the link between sterilization and cancer, found that those who had the procedure had a 10 percent greater chance of developing the disease.

It also found a sharp increase in the risk of contracting the most aggressive form of prostate cancer, although this type of the disease is still relatively rare.

The dangers appeared to be highest among men who had a vasectomy at a younger age, researchers said. …

(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Health/Medicine
KEYWORDS: prostatecancer; vasectomy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

1 posted on 07/11/2014 8:12:37 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

A few brave urologists, 3 decades ago, in private were discussing this.

Somehow this information got buried like the increase in breast cancer in women with abortions.


2 posted on 07/11/2014 8:17:08 AM PDT by Grampa Dave ( Obama's Storm of Illegal immigrants, = new democrat voters and His Katrina Moment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Please never post that word(vasectomy) here ,ouch


3 posted on 07/11/2014 8:20:37 AM PDT by molson209 (Blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

War on men.


4 posted on 07/11/2014 8:23:56 AM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave

Nothing will get in the way of the culture of death and it’s sacraments... pornography, contraception & abortion.


5 posted on 07/11/2014 8:40:27 AM PDT by rwilson99 (Please tell me how the words "shall not perish and have everlasting life" would NOT apply to Mary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

NOW they tell me....


6 posted on 07/11/2014 8:41:46 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Haven't you lost enough freedoms? Support an end to the WOD now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

And women who get their tubes “tied” (closed) are at risk for many hormonal issues, pain, and menstruation trouble which lasts for decades.

Just don’t.


7 posted on 07/11/2014 8:43:02 AM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
NOW they tell me....

No kidding. Had mine 35 yrs ago.

8 posted on 07/11/2014 8:44:14 AM PDT by TangoLimaSierra (To win the country back, we need to be as mean as the libs say we are.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

This was reported years ago and further studies failed to prove the link between vasectomy and prostate cancer. This study will likely suffer the same fate.


9 posted on 07/11/2014 8:48:05 AM PDT by 43north (BHO: 50% black, 50% white, 100% RED.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

I had this suspicion in the back of my mind recently. I was diagnosed with gleason grade 7 adenocarcinoma in my prostate March this year. After my third child was born my ex wife decided she didn’t want to have any more children and I had a vasectomy at age 26. She left me later and went on to have another family but that is another story. I’m in my early sixties now and the relationship between the vasectomy and my cancer has made me curious about any causation. The story ends well as I had a incredible surgeon who removed the nasty critter and I have been blessed with complete removal of cancer and remarkable recovery with NO COMPLICATIONS.


10 posted on 07/11/2014 8:50:04 AM PDT by strongbow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TangoLimaSierra

Yep. I had it done over 20 years ago


11 posted on 07/11/2014 8:51:28 AM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

And there is also a linkage to multiple partners and prostate cancer.

I saw many give in to the snipper routine and doubted the wisdom of it. I figure all my parts have a purpose so I’ve kept them, pains and all and intend do to that until I don’t need them anymore.

Same thing goes for tube tying. Cats and dogs get fat as hogs after such. Maybe there is a message in that?

I’m amazed at the number of medications so many take. There is a pill for everything.


12 posted on 07/11/2014 9:02:15 AM PDT by Sequoyah101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

Lookie here


13 posted on 07/11/2014 9:04:13 AM PDT by petitfour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: petitfour

This correlation was known a long time back. I remember reading about it in natural family planning materials.


14 posted on 07/11/2014 9:12:20 AM PDT by Tax-chick (The world has enough land, food, water, clothing, and money. It doesn't have enough love.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

It’s the old rule for all body parts: use it or lose it.


15 posted on 07/11/2014 9:16:02 AM PDT by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

Had mine a year ago. No cancer yet... Was 44 when I went under the knife.

Methinks there’s another one of those “correlation/causation” things going on here. One does not equal the other.


16 posted on 07/11/2014 9:17:40 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (Tri nornar eg bir. Binde til rota...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

precious bodily fluids bump


17 posted on 07/11/2014 9:18:35 AM PDT by dangerdoc ((this space for rent))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

I read somewhere that every man will get prostate cancer if he lives long enough. The vast majority of prostate cancer is the slow growing kind where treatment is more harmful than good.


18 posted on 07/11/2014 9:19:35 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Haven't you lost enough freedoms? Support an end to the WOD now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Back prior to my vasectomy I asked the doctor a lot of questions; one of which was any link to prostate cancer. He assured me that there was no increase in the chance.

I had the procedure (which I could share but don’t want all the men to cringe) and haven’t produced a child since (five was enough).


19 posted on 07/11/2014 9:26:28 AM PDT by rfreedom4u (Your feelings don't trump my free speech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

“I read somewhere that every man will get prostate cancer if he lives long enough.”

The old rule of thumb was that starting at age 70, the percent of men with prostate cancer equals age. However, most men die of something else by those ages. The cancer is only found on autopsy.


20 posted on 07/11/2014 9:31:25 AM PDT by VanShuyten ("a shadow...draped nobly in the folds of a gorgeous eloquence.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson