Skip to comments.Newt Gingrich : 2014-09-12 : The Five Strategic Failures in President Obama's ISIS Speech
Posted on 09/13/2014 8:40:12 AM PDT by Patton@Bastogne
September 12, 2014
Newt Gingrich : The Five Strategic Failures in President Obama's ISIS Speech
President Obama gave a pretty good speech Wednesday night. Pressured by the American people's overwhelming support for defeating ISIS, President Obama gave a speech his predecessor, President George W. Bush could have applauded.
Many of President Obama's words were reassuring. He was dedicated to defeating ISIS. He would pursue anyone who threatened America. He was committed to a long, difficult campaign.
Unfortunately for the President and the country, there were five major strategic flaws in his speech. These flaws are so profound that the Congress should hold hearings exploring each of them.
President Obama's speech was a good start to a long and difficult process of figuring out how to defeat radical Islamism and learning the lessons of 13 years of failure to do so. It cannot have been the final word on what America has to do to win the war with radical Islamism.
The five strategic failures in the speech are:
If left uncorrected these five failures doom the Presidents plan to failure.
Let me explain each failure and why it must be fixed.
1. Radical Islamism is not an Iraqi or Syrian problem. Radical Islamism has supporters, advocates, recruiters and sources of resources all across the planet.
As we learned on September 11, 2001, it only takes a few people to do incredible damage. There are more than 10,000 terrorists from over 50 countries who have joined ISIS. Here in the United States, there are recruiters and supporters of ISIS.
Well over 100 Americans have joined ISIS. Two Minnesotans have been killed in Syria. One of them had clearance to work on the runway of the Minneapolis Airport for a decade. We are lucky he decided to take his terrorist activities to Syria instead of to his day job.
Radical Islamism includes Boko Haram in Nigeria, elements in Libya, Hamas in Gaza and dozens of groups around the world. President Obama failed to have any global strategy for a viral movement which requires analyzing the problem as an epidemic rather than as a problem between nation-states.
Without a global strategy we will simply continue the 13-year pattern of failure and the radical Islamist movement will continue to grow.
2. The worst moment of President Obama's speech was his suggestion that Somalia and Yemen were models of success that his anti-ISIS campaign could follow.
Both Somalia and Yemen are disasters. Both are host to rampant terrorist activity. Somalia has virtually no government. Yemen has a very weak government which may not survive. If this is the Obama vision of success, it is a horrifying accumulation of human poverty, misery and violence which Americans should repudiate.
The President is trapped because he is being forced into a fight he doesn't particularly want and he is determined to do as little as possible. That is a formula for imposing violence and destruction on a lot of innocent people who can't defend and protect themselves. America has to develop a positive strategy of growing reliable, self-governing allies. That requires confronting the reality that both anti-terrorism and counter-insurgency campaigns are inadequate models. We do not have the doctrine, the training or the tools today for that project.
3. One of the great failures in the 13 years since 9/11 has been our failure to develop a system for compelling our allies to cooperate in defeating radical Islamism.
Qatar is currently the most visible example of a tiny country run like a medieval fiefdom using its oil and gas wealth to openly subsidize fanatics who want to destroy us. The Saudis are notorious for funding madrassas (Islamic schools) which produce terrorists.
We have to be prepared to exert far more pressure on countries who are undermining the war against radical Islamism. Qatar is a sufficiently small country that its ruling dynasty should be informed that in the absence of policy changes, there will be a regime change. We do not have to helplessly wring our diplomatic hands while they fund those who would cut off our heads. Our Navy alone could persuade the Qataris in a day or two that an anti- Radical policy would be healthier.
4. Sadly, this war with radical Islamism may go on for a long time. Politicians are already asking for an exit strategy. When you face enemies who want to cut off your heads and destroy your civilization, the only exit strategy is victory.
We spent 46 years containing the Soviet Union until it collapsed. We may have to spend half of a century or more hunting down radicals, growing reliable self-governing allies, and convincing friends and neutrals to be anti-radical.
Any politician's promise of a quick victory or a glib exit strategy is a fantasy and should be treated with contempt. We can grow prosperity, sustain freedom and live good lives while waging a relentless, unending campaign against radical Islamism but we will have to sustain that campaign for a long time.
5. All this will require new resources, new programs, and potentially new institutions. We went through that process of programmatic and institutional invention in the early stages of the Cold War. We have to do so again. The failure to address the resource issue was the biggest sign President Obama and his team had not really thought through the war they were announcing.
Congress has a Constitutional obligation to hold hearings on these five failures. We need to think before we act. We need a tough-minded, honest assessment of why, 13 years after 9/11, we are still far from a serious strategy to defeat radical Islamism. More floundering, more bombing and more drones are not a substitute for a sound, thoroughly debated strategy.
Your Friend, ~Newt Gingrich, 2012 Newt Warns against the Proposed 9-11 NYC Islamic Mosque and Islamic Sharia Law .
Sign Up for Newt Gingrich's E-Newsletter
Newt Gingrich 2012 Speech Constitutional Removal of Radical-Liberal Federal Judges
"We have to frankly break the back of the secular-socialist machine, elect people committed to representing the American people, and then methodically rip the system apart."
Gingrich Compares Radical-Isalmics Muslims To Nazis
Newt Gingrich On The Threat Of Radical Islam
Newt Gingrich Americas Defense of Judea-Christian Ideals and Defense against Islamic Fascism
Gingrich: Aggressive Prosecution of Radical-Militant U.S. Muslim Groups
~Newt Gingrich, 2012
Newt Warns against the Proposed 9-11 NYC Islamic Mosque and Islamic Sharia Law
Narrowing it down to 5 must have been a daunting task.
Nice to hear from Newt...
Nowadays, it's front page and on almost every page........Just goes to show how fast and dangerous they've grown in just a mere 20 years.
I shudder to think what's in store during the next 20.......
No doubt! Still, these 5 are pretty well targeted.
I couldn’t believe that Bambi was holding up Yemen and Somalia as “successes.” Success at what? I guess it depends on what his overall objective is, and he’s sure not going to be dumb enough to reveal that in a speech!
"CNN contributor Newt Gingrich said Wednesday night that President Barack Obamas White House address outlining a four-point strategy to confront ISIS was strong, and above all pro-American, speech. Perhaps the former House Speaker felt Obama took notes from his imagined pseudo-Reagan draft from last week.
I thought it was a very strong speech overall, Gingrich said, noting a couple of exceptions. Probably the most explicitly pro-American speech hes ever made. He kept coming back again and again toward the end in a way that most Americans will resonate with. And I think he achieved a fair amount of what he needs to get started on this.
YEP....that’s what I thought also....sheesh
A few well placed nukes can reduce the problem down to its lowest common denominator.
I just wish that Newt had the character to accompany his intelligence.
They are failures for America. They are not failures for the Sultan in Washington.
give it a rest a’ready
Islam can be defeated in 2 years. Cut off their food. Islam produces nothing but oil. Drill, drill, drill in every known pocket of oil in the Gulf, ANWAR, etc... Cut off the food sales to every single Islamic country. Within 2 years...victory. Zimbabwe is a perfect example. Without Western food the entire country would be a ghost town.
The harsh reality of the Global War on Terrorism is there is no safe rear areas.
There were two harsh unspoken truths about September 11, 2002:
First, everything used to hijack the airliners were permitted by the existing security criteria. That’s right, it was totally LEGAL to board an airliner with them.
Second, the attacks were launched within the United States.
If those two facts, alone, don’t give you a hint as to how badly the last three Presidential Administrations (1993 - 2015) have screwed things up nothing will.
IMHO, the first step is to declare war on ISIS and all the other “previously unknown” terrorist groups we are going to encounter.
A declared state of war gives any government a vastly enlarged tool box to work with when it comes to dealing with the terrorists, uncooperative and hostile nation states, and individual citizens including our own and our politicians. Harsh facts, but true.
The only other option is having our grandchildren become slaves to radical Islamists. Read Robert A. Heinlein’s 1964 novel Farnham’s Freehold to get a feeling for what that future might look like.
Newt is a jerk. I heard him on CNN after the speech praising Obama to the heavens.
The defeat of Muslim invaders at the Gates of Vienna was at the end of the 1600s.
That was over three-hundred years ago. I suspect the conservative time required to eliminate Islam will be 700 years from now - in 2700/2800AD. A shorter length of time, a wildly improbable will be around 200 more years or 2200 AD.
They, the Islamists, value death. Let’s give it to them in spades. Those who witness the devastation will value their lives and hopefully convert to Christianity. At that point the carnage will end.
The West’s need for oil let them climb out from under their rock.
Newt's a big man. Big enough to take both sides of many issues.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.