Posted on 02/03/2015 6:35:48 PM PST by originalbuckeye
Did anyone see Medea Benjamin on O'Reilly tonight? She of course blamed GWB for the Jordanian pilot's execution. She said we never should have gone into Iraq in the first place. Then she said our interventionist policies in Egypt and Libya cause ISIS to act the way they do. I wanted to smack BOR for not pointing out it was OBAMA and his ARAB SPRING interventions that funded and otherwise supported the uprisings in Egypt and Libya.
Remember that at the height of the war, Code Stink gave money to teh enemy.
Medea and her hussies don’t care about the barbarism or the life of the Jordanian pilot. All those Communists care about is destroying American and stealing money.
...there’s a reason Rush’ name “Ted Baxter” works so well for BOR - dude has double digit IQ I’m sure....
BOR is a lib plant. He kissed Zero’s butt before the first election when he was the one ‘conservative’ that got a chance at an interview. Completely fawned over Obama.
That was it for me with BOR.
Same with Chris Fatass Christie and the hug right before the election that was front page in every paper in the country.
Pretty much a good judge of anyone claiming to be a conservative, “What did you do to stop Obama?”
They don’t answer that correctly, NEXT!
Why does he even give them the time of day?
His ratings must be down.
Medea Benjamin and Bill O’Reilly — a festival of intellectual dishonesty.
I watched it, O’Reilly was drooling. I’m telling ya, he’s got the hots for that commie skank.
He’s after her trust fund.
Would it irk her to the 1st black president signed “The Iraq Liberation Act” which explicity spelled out U.S. policy and intent?
In it the Congress, unanimously and with President Clintons’s ascent, by signature, to remove Sadaam, his boyz and regime.
They were given the opportunity to leave on their own accord or by force, from the United States and it made clear nothing else would be acceptable.
So, your boy and most of the representatives authorizing Bush in 2003, were unambiguous in 1998.
The Act found that between 1980 and 1998 Iraq had:
committed various and significant violations of international law,
had failed to comply with the obligations to which it had agreed following the Gulf War and
further had ignored resolutions of the United Nations Security Council.
The Act declared that it was the Policy of the United States to support “regime change.”
.
.
.
.
President Clinton stated in February 1998:
Iraq admitted, among other things, an offensive biological warfare capability, notably, 5,000 gallons of botulinum, which causes botulism; 2,000 gallons of anthrax; 25 biological-filled Scud warheads; and 157 aerial bombs. And I might say UNSCOM inspectors believe that Iraq has actually greatly understated its production....
Over the past few months, as [the weapons inspectors] have come closer and closer to rooting out Iraq’s remaining nuclear capacity, Saddam has undertaken yet another gambit to thwart their ambitions by imposing debilitating conditions on the inspectors and declaring key sites which have still not been inspected off limits....
It is obvious that there is an attempt here, based on the whole history of this operation since 1991, to protect whatever remains of his capacity to produce weapons of mass destruction, the missiles to deliver them, and the feed stocks necessary to produce them. The UNSCOM inspectors believe that Iraq still has stockpiles of chemical and biological munitions, a small force of Scud-type missiles, and the capacity to restart quickly its production program and build many, many more weapons....
Now, let’s imagine the future. What if he fails to comply and we fail to act, or we take some ambiguous third route, which gives him yet more opportunities to develop this program of weapons of mass destruction and continue to press for the release of the sanctions and continue to ignore the solemn commitments that he made? Well, he will conclude that the international community has lost its will. He will then conclude that he can go right on and do more to rebuild an arsenal of devastating destruction. And some day, some way, I guarantee you he’ll use the arsenal....
.
.
***********************************************************************
.
.
?
The United States Military, as a matter of policy was always going to war with Iraq
.
.
÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷.
.
.
WHO VOTED FOR REGIME CHANGE IN IRAQ 1998 and AUTHORIZED ACTION of U.S. POLICY IN 2002?
You can start here:
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/1998/roll482.xml
She wouldn’t shut up, and she talked over him.
He is always saying his program is a “no spin zone”, and he usually cuts people off -— but he let her talk away. I wanted to smack both of them.
Code Pink members were actually in Egypt stirring crap up.
That woman is a brain dead moron whose organization supports Hamas and Hezbollah..I wouldn’t mind seeing ISIS cut off her head, it might actually make her somewhat appealing
Speaking personally, I blame the Ottoman Empire.
Asking Code Pink about stopping terrorism is like asking Charles Manson how to fix race relations.
The one and only good thing about ISIS is that they wouldn't bother trying to embarrass the USA by consorting with American lefties like CP. They don't care. If any CP people fell into their hands, they'd get beheaded like every other infidel.
First time I ever heard this obnoxious, whiney b*tch talk. Oh man! Makes one want to cut their wrists. I can see why her life consists of protesting with a bunch of other whiney b*tches. No man in his right might could stand to be around her for more than maybe 5 seconds.
Turned the channel when she came on. BOR is a moron giving that ugly mutt any airtime. What was to be gained? Anyone watching his show already knows what that women is about, and need no reminders.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.