Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Patrick Stewart defends ‘gay cake’ bakery (in Northern Ireland; refused gays)
News Corp Australia ^ | June 05, 2015 2:57PM

Posted on 06/05/2015 10:15:49 AM PDT by Olog-hai

Veteran actor and gay rights activist Patrick Stewart has defended a Christian bakery which was found guilty of discrimination for refusing to bake a cake with a pro-gay marriage slogan.

Last month, a judge ruled that Ashers Baking Company in Northern Ireland had discriminated against a gay customer by refusing to make a cake with the words “support gay marriage”, along with a picture of Bert and Ernie from Sesame Street.

Gareth Lee commissioned the cake for an event to mark International Day Against Homophobia and Transphobia. The bakery initially accepted the order, but called Mr. Lee two days later to cancel. …

(Excerpt) Read more at news.com.au ...


TOPICS: Local News; Religion; Society
KEYWORDS: captainpicard; facepalm; gaystapo; homosexualagenda; lavendermafia; northernireland; patrickstewart; uk
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

1 posted on 06/05/2015 10:15:49 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

The baker probably should have refused on the grounds that he wouldn’t engage in copyright infringement.


2 posted on 06/05/2015 10:17:53 AM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Respect to Patrick Stewart, at least he has common sense in this issue.


3 posted on 06/05/2015 10:19:47 AM PDT by Marko413
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tanknetter; Olog-hai; GraceG; SevenofNine; Norm Lenhart; TADSLOS; GOPsterinMA
The Baker should have refused on the grounds that he didn't want to upset Muslim Sensibilities.

The Baker is for Freedom of Expression BUT he didn't want to inflame a situation. (al la Pam Geller)

4 posted on 06/05/2015 10:20:20 AM PDT by KC_Lion (PLEASE SUPPORT FR. Donate Monthly or Join Club 300! G-d bless you all!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

How’s he doing after Mel Gibson bit off his nose?


5 posted on 06/05/2015 10:20:25 AM PDT by dainbramaged (Get out of my country now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

“Make it so.”


6 posted on 06/05/2015 10:22:39 AM PDT by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Ian McKellen will not be happy.


7 posted on 06/05/2015 10:23:07 AM PDT by miss marmelstein (Richard the Third: "I should like to drive away not only the Turks (moslims) but all my foes.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
Stewart demonstrates a basic wisdom in his statement that "It was not because this was a gay couple they objected, it was not because they were going to be celebrating some kind of marriage, it was the actual words on the cake they objected to, they found them offensive." He recognized that discrimination, as applied legally, is about persons, not ideas, which is how I have argued businesses should operate here in America. People cannot refuse to sell cakes to white supremacists just because of who they are, but they could refuse to write something bigoted on a cake, and I think any court would defend that principle. Focus on the words and not on the people and you may stand a chance. Sadly, though, that did not hold true in N. Ireland, but I would like to think we have still not managed to fall as far as they have over there, at least not yet.
8 posted on 06/05/2015 10:25:30 AM PDT by cothrige ("An error which is not resisted is approved; a truth which is not defended is suppressed" Felix III)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KC_Lion

Hitting back at a SJB, directly, allows them to pull the whole faux outrage victimization bit.

Hitting back at them using a legal technically, tho, really ticks them off. Especially if they know you’re just using it to mask your real reasoning.


9 posted on 06/05/2015 10:26:04 AM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

A decision so wrong that even a gay rights activist can’t agree with it. Thing is, this is a natural progression of the gay mafia’s cause. Denying anything to someone who is gay, for any reason, is by result, a crime.


10 posted on 06/05/2015 10:26:08 AM PDT by kingu (Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KC_Lion

There would have been rioting on Sesame Street


11 posted on 06/05/2015 10:32:31 AM PDT by GeronL ("NEW ARRIVALS" sci-fi ebook is free this weekend at Amazon!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cothrige

Yes, exactly. If a baker can be forced to write something offensive on a cake, then an actor can be forced to say something offensive.

However, that’s a challenging analogy to apply to a wedding cake. At least a plain one, without any sort of writing or topper, or other explicit message.


12 posted on 06/05/2015 10:33:23 AM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kingu

See my post above. Stewart is an actor before he’s a gay rights activist. So he gets the implications of forcing someone to convey a message (whether in writing or speaking) they disagree with.


13 posted on 06/05/2015 10:35:50 AM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Whether or not you agree with Patrick Stewart on gay rights, I’ll give him credit for a certain consistency. He may be all for the gays, but he’s also for the right to say no to them and against their efforts to force their agenda on those who cannot in good conscience support it.

I can accept that, whether or not I completely agree.


14 posted on 06/05/2015 10:40:37 AM PDT by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

He doesn’t want to go where no man has gone before?......................


15 posted on 06/05/2015 10:44:42 AM PDT by Red Badger (Man builds a ship in a bottle. God builds a universe in the palm of His hand.............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marko413

Yes, have to respect Stewart for being principled in this.

Though he is going to catch hell for it in the UK. They’ve pretty much destroyed Rupert Everett’s life for saying that gays should not be raising children.


16 posted on 06/05/2015 10:45:51 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

17 posted on 06/05/2015 10:46:58 AM PDT by Rodamala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

18 posted on 06/05/2015 10:49:48 AM PDT by Fido969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Finally a gay activist with some brains. Although pointing out the writing on the wall just before the wall falls on you is a tad late. Nevertheless, better late than never. All Stewart is saying is, “hey wait a minute, I think we need to hold on to at least the last shred of personal freedom under the law, I don’t like the way the Muslims are smiling these days...”


19 posted on 06/05/2015 10:55:16 AM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
The little boy was sitting on a park bench munching on one chocolate bar after another. After the 6th one a man on the bench across from him said, 'Son, you know eating all those chocolates isn't good for you. It will give you acne, rot your teeth, make you fat.'

The boy replied, 'My grandfather lived to be 107 years old.'

The man asked, 'Did your grandfather eat 6 chocolate bars at a time?'

The little boy answered, 'No, he minded his own damn business!'

20 posted on 06/05/2015 10:59:34 AM PDT by 11th Commandment ("THOSE WHO TIRE LOSE")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson