Posted on 03/09/2016 5:47:16 AM PST by knarf
Trump's victory in Hawaii is earth shattering (imo) because it is THERE that a liberal base had such a strong hold and it occurs to me ...
It will be too late (unless there is some law that a former president can be charged with fraud and all the resulting side suits that would come from that), but Trump DID investigate the birth certificate and he DID imply (as did Joe Arpaio) that he HAD something .... but it never materialized
Which many here in FR suspected might have been because of threats
Which would explain (in part) Sheriff Joe's endorsement of Trump
Anyway ... I think it is interesting Trump took Hawaii
Stirring up Obama-Identity issues now would only help the Democrats, providing their media a subject for ridicule and motivating their black and leftist voters to protect the One. Neither Trump nor Joe Arpaio are guys to hold much back, so I doubt they ever had any blockbuster evidence — just a lot of implications from analysis.
Not sure if prosecutions would be easily accomplished, but wouldn’t it be great for a new Republican President to have his AG get to the bottom of Obama’s identity games, and promulgate the Truth, whatever it is, for all to see? The effect of honesty would be vast.
“but Trump DID investigate the birth certificate and he DID imply (as did Joe Arpaio) that he HAD something .... but it never materialized”
You really think Trump investigated something rather than spouting a bunch of conspiracy loon nonsense.
If any of them had found anything we would have heard about it.
But if one became President ......
I think the true story went down with Loretta Fuddy, who controlled access to birth records in Hawaii. According to one internet piece I read, she was also a member of Subud, the Indonesian cult that Soetero Sr. and Stanley Ann Dunham subscribed to.
“I’m moving to Hawaii because I don’t think they have an extradition agreement with the US.”
The complete lack of evidence is just further proof of how deep the conspiracy goes!
/ Birther Fever Swamp
Watch ... determine for yourself
Imply? Trump out-and-out claimed his investigators were finding amazing things. Since that day nothing but crickets from Trump and Arpiao both.
Which many here in FR suspected might have been because of threats.
Or, more likely, because they didn't find anything.
Anyway ... I think it is interesting Trump took Hawaii
Four tenths of one percent of the people in Hawaii vote for Trump in the Republican caucus and you find a link with the Birther investigations? I admit I'm not seeing it.
A offer of proof, as to why your above statement is invalid.
My question to you: During Barry Soetoro's (1st) Presidential campaign, there were numerous lawsuits filed to stop him.
The question, which lawsuit was heard, and a judgement entered, in regard to his eligibility.
From wikipedia (not a source I would recommend.) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama_presidential_eligibility_litigation
No suit or challenge has resulted in the grant of any relief to the plaintiffs by any court or other body.
All of the lawsuits were dismissed for "Lack of Standing."
Put another way; Not one piece of evidence was ever seen / heard / or judged, to whether it's a True statement of FACT(s), or was False.
Assume one of these lawsuits had the "Smoking Gun." Guess what, it {the smoking gun} never got to see the light of day. Thus,"If any of them had found anything we would have heard about it."
FLASE
Eric Holder
Don’t forget about Occidental College enrollment paperwork. I’m willing to bet that the box is checked for “foreign student”.
I didn't start this thread to re-hash already hashed data .... but to raise the possibility of legal action against obozo
Consider the outbreak of activity in every direction should Trump actually GET some data from Hawaii (I know .. Fuddy's death and all that)
I honestly can't suppose someone with earth shattering data would not archive it somewhere, somehow
Even JFK will be completely exposed someday when they think it's safe.
And in a “caucus” that the establishment has been claiming that only cruz can win!
The democrat primary caucus isn't until Mar. 26
F;got about that ... thanx
“Assume one of these lawsuits had the “Smoking Gun.” Guess what, it {the smoking gun} never got to see the light of day.”
No. All that means is that there never was a court case. There is absolutely nothing stopping any of these people from publicizing the “smoking gun”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.