Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fox: Jeanine Pirro reacts to Bill Clinton's meeting with AG Lynch
Fox & Friends ^ | July 1, 2016

Posted on 07/01/2016 7:27:20 AM PDT by wtd

Lynch is not recusing herself, she is not deferring to the prosecutors, AND Hillary will NOT be indicted as Loretta Lynch and Obama are supporting Hillary's run for POTUS.

Prosecutors look at cases all the time. As she stated, AG Lynch will accept LE/FBI determinations yet not indict Hillary because the first witness will be the President of the US.

(Excerpt) Read more at video.foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Society
KEYWORDS: arizona; clinton; criminalconspiracy; emails; hillary; hillarycriminalprobe; jeaninepirro; lorettalynch; lynch; lynchclintonmeeting; lynchnorecusal; lynchrecusal; phoenix
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last
To: DarthVader
-- See post#9 --

Okay. I did. The linked article lays out what is Janine Pierro's theory, that Obama is complicit in breaking the law relating to handling of classified material, and for that reason, the DOJ will not prosecute a violation.

The DOJ can't recuse itself from the "prosecute / not prosecute" decision. It is the only entity empowered to make that choice.

If the FBI forwards its investigation file, that event signals that the FBI finds probable cause a crime has been committed.

41 posted on 07/01/2016 8:33:34 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

If you looked down I redirected you to #18.


42 posted on 07/01/2016 8:35:28 AM PDT by DarthVader (Politicians govern out of self interest, Statesmen govern for a Vision greater than themselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: DarthVader
-- Wrong post. See #18 --

I completely agree with that. Clinton's email server and her (and Obama's) reckless handling of classified material is a hot potato. The desire is to put out a narrative that justifies "no prosecution" in this case. Facts are going to be ingnored or misinterpreted to get there.

43 posted on 07/01/2016 8:37:15 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: DarthVader

No, one of them dropped a dime on the other. That reporter wasn’t just there. This isn’t hollywood.


44 posted on 07/01/2016 8:43:46 AM PDT by Fhios (The U.S needs Hillary like a fish needs a bicycle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

She is between a serious rock and a hard place on this one. I almost feel sorry for her but don’t. In reality she is “recusing” herself by actions and “not recusing” by public statement. When the time comes for indictment she is going to get serious “advisement” on carrying this out from people that she dare not resist. They hold all the cards.


45 posted on 07/01/2016 8:43:50 AM PDT by DarthVader (Politicians govern out of self interest, Statesmen govern for a Vision greater than themselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Fhios

This isn’t Hollywood or your popular conspiracy theory. This is real life hardball.


46 posted on 07/01/2016 8:46:37 AM PDT by DarthVader (Politicians govern out of self interest, Statesmen govern for a Vision greater than themselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: DarthVader
-- She is between a serious rock and a hard place on this one. --

Yep. But at least she didn't try to pass the buck to Comey with "FBI's recommendations" garbage that the press is running with.

-- When the time comes for indictment she is going to get serious "advisement" on carrying this out from people that she dare not resist. They hold all the cards. --

Agree again. Assuming the FBI finds probable cause, she's going to have to deal with it one way or another. "The law" is merely a tool - whether it will be followed or not is a political question.

47 posted on 07/01/2016 8:49:34 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: ought-six

Just who are these “career” prosecutors? We need to know who they are and why they are so impartial. I can’t imagine any of the hired in the last 8 years of being even slightly impartial.


48 posted on 07/01/2016 9:05:36 AM PDT by Oldexpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: blackdog
A phone call or text message between the two would have saved a few million dollars of taxpayer money instead of two corporate executive jets parallel parking for a chat.

Yeah, but then Putin would have the details within a few hours. :)

49 posted on 07/01/2016 9:09:25 AM PDT by Mr. Jeeves ([CTRL]-[GALT]-[DELETE])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

THAT would make sense! PLUS a MONEY PAYOUT!


50 posted on 07/01/2016 9:10:21 AM PDT by Ann Archy (ABORTION....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wtd

Notice Bubba has disappeared from the scene

Wonder if the press will ask him about the meeting when ever he comes up for air


51 posted on 07/01/2016 9:11:27 AM PDT by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wtd

She is recusing herself

No she is not,she is accepting recommendations.
Lots of wiggle room there


52 posted on 07/01/2016 9:14:22 AM PDT by CGASMIA68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: wtd

I want to see guillotines on the White House lawn.


53 posted on 07/01/2016 9:15:54 AM PDT by beethovenfan (Islam is a cancer on civilization.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fhios
"No, one of them dropped a dime on the other. That reporter wasn’t just there. This isn’t hollywood."

Not necessarily. There are a lot of ramp workers at Sky Harbor who are good conservatives, (I know one) and one of them may have called a friend that happened to work at the local ABC network.

It could be that this was supposed to be a secret meeting, and they just got caught.

54 posted on 07/01/2016 9:17:41 AM PDT by Henchster (Free Republic - the BEST site on the web!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: blackdog

“Two government paid and funded politicians “

Please explain what government funds William Jefferson Clinton receives currently. (other than standard ex-president benefits) Thanks.


55 posted on 07/01/2016 9:26:16 AM PDT by rhoda_penmark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Right Brother

I bet she looks good without makeup when she is at the gym every day.


56 posted on 07/01/2016 9:39:25 AM PDT by forgotten man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rhoda_penmark

As a pilot, do you have any idea what this stunt to avoid oversight just cost the taxpayer? The FAA/ CLOSED AIRSPACE, GATE STAND DOWNS, ARRIVAL AND DEPARTURE SIDS AND STARS? NOT TO MENTION THE SECRET SERVICE AND DOJ ARMED SECURITY DETAILS!


57 posted on 07/01/2016 9:43:03 AM PDT by blackdog (There is no such thing as healing, only a balance between destructive and constructive forces.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: rhoda_penmark

Road a pen mark. A real thinker.


58 posted on 07/01/2016 9:44:36 AM PDT by blackdog (There is no such thing as healing, only a balance between destructive and constructive forces.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: blackdog

Who was the last AG to fly over to China? I cannot recall a single AG ever flying outside this country on our dime. Obama’s wife just blew another 50 million on a vacation with her girls.


59 posted on 07/01/2016 9:46:52 AM PDT by Lumper20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Lumper20

This article:

http://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/ag-mukaseys-personal-travel-cost-taxpayers-155k/

Says the AG (at least Bush-era) was mandated to travel via govt transport.


60 posted on 07/01/2016 9:50:49 AM PDT by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson