Because climate models are awesome...lok
Even with all their Earth monitoring satellites they can’t create a valid case of how this liberal Climate Change model makes sense. Repositioning, recalibration, aligning instruments and a plethora of horseshit explanations abound.
Why on God’s Green Earth would anyone believe that NASA could predict and validly assess the climate on another planet. The mind boggles with the inanity of this article.
Until the SUV came along...
Who stole the water? Why? And are we next?
This government can even get unemployment numbers, weather or climate, or anything else right so why would I have any reason to believe a NASA which has been tasked to promote Islam?
The there a Clinton or Bush ancestor ruling the planet?
More junk science from NASA.
If Venus is closer to the sun than Earth how could it be colder? A bit hard to believe.
Of course it was ... these are the same people who used to imagine that Venus was the Earth just with hotter and with more clouds ... until I. Velikovsky came along and predicted what the geniuses at NASA were to later find was scientific truth.
Venus was always like it is and it is likely not more than a few dozens of thousand years old. Both Mars and the Moon have near identical cratering heavy on one side light on the other as if something big came very close to both.
See here The Immanuel Velikovsky Archive
http://www.varchive.org/
A day on Venus takes 243 of our days, longer than it takes it to orbit the sun. Then planet was never the paradise these retards make it out to have been - a sun baked hell for half the year and freezing the other half. The greenhouse effect is the only mechanism for ‘moderating’ the planet’s temps.
A computer model is a program. A program is not reality. This is supposition, aided by a computer program.
Pile of pseudo science bullshit.
Is it funding time already?
Agenda driven speculation by alien hunters who have government jobs.
And this is based on what?
Venus may not have even been in the solar system 2.9 billion years ago....it could have just wandered in from outer space. Also, why does Venus spin backwards?
A bunch of NASA ‘scientists’ sit down in a room looking at the sparse data that they have on Venus. They cook up a ‘theory’ that Venus could once have been habitable. They’d with the few facts they have they spin a yarn as to how that might have been possible. Anybody see a problem with that? In high school chemistry it was called ‘fudging the results’ — and you got an automatic ‘F’ for it.