Posted on 02/10/2017 11:51:42 AM PST by LibWhacker
That kid may have made the scribles on the board but did not draw the Hammer and C
Cant even hold the chalk
A kid whose very first picture is that well articulated probably won’t get much from the American public school system.
All Devos has to say is “We are going to focus on the 3R’s and stop all the Poliical Indoctrination disguised as education”
AND FIRE ANY ONE WHO GETS IN HER WAY.
Libtards get into positions of power and then only hire other libtards. They need to be purged like they purged republicans.
Not fired (we are not like them) but closely monitored to DO THEIR JOBS and not indoctrinate)
Oh BS, this kid didn’t draw that. They can’t draw anything at that age.
I think it was meant as a joke.
In the playroom at the public library someone took the multicolored letters and spelled out “obama sux”
You mean not a crescent and star? That’ll be the second picture.
great, but 1st picture ? not probable.
Exactly. The kid looks to be 3 y/o. At that age, they are in the *scribble* stage.
The scribbles are his; the symbol? No.
Doesn’t matter. The leftards lie about everything.
Wow, that kid is a fast learner. Just started school and he’s ready to graduate, already!
This person needs to be in a psych ward. The child needs to be adopted by a Conservative family.
Fake.
If anyone here really thought the kid drew this picture, my recommendation is go loose off a couple of hundred rounds then come back inside and have a cold one. You are understandably too tightly wound.
“Hope DeVos gets right on this. The brainwashing has to stop.”
Are you trying to suggest the child actually drew that? Seems like it; correct me if I’m wrong.
As a satirical commentary on the current state of public education, the point it makes is accurate.
But it’s the equivalent of what we see in Pookie’s Toons. It is a staged photograph. The kid did not draw that.
Plus, the “liberal” who “speaks” is obviously a conservative, making fun of libs .
Of course it's a joke. Lighten up humorless carpers
That is what happened with homosexuals and the Catholic church in the last century. The Bishops reasoned that homosexuals could be good priests if they remained, as heterosexuals are called to do, celibate. The error, if error it be, was that homosexuals who are not totally in the closet will not abstain and an inordinate proportion of homosexual men prefer not long physically adult male partners, or rather, prey. The priesthood has always included a higher than population %age of homosexuals but they were not public queers and maintained their celibacy at least as well as the hetero priests. It is the same with homosexuals in the military. Once upon a time their discretion was great until they got ordered to come out of the closet for the New Military. Now they are a pain in the ass and dangerous, too.
I have a five year old grandson who has been building bridges out of blocks and popsicle sticks and paste since he was two. His brother, now two & 7 months, constructed a “helicopter” by finding the hammer and some nails and nailing two paint stirrers in a balanced X to a 6” piece of two by four while Mom was hanging up clothes in the back. “I only tapped my thumb once and it didn’t make me cry.” I think he knows more words than I do and has better grammar.
The way he is holding the chalk, no, he did not do that work.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.