Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Country Just Used a Patriot Missile to Take Down a $200 Drone
Futurism ^ | Mar. 18, 2017 | Dom Galeon and Kristin Houser

Posted on 03/18/2017 7:24:14 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster

A Country Just Used a Patriot Missile to Take Down a $200 Drone

by Dom Galeon and Kristin Houser

Serious Overkill

In a rather unusual show of force, a U.S. ally shot down a small quadcopter drone using a Patriot missile, according to Gen. David Perkins, speaking at the Association of the United States Army’s Global Force symposium. And it wasn’t a drill. “We have a very close ally of ours that was dealing with an adversary using small quadcopter [unmanned aircraft systems],” Perkins said. “They shot it down with a Patriot missile.”

A Patriot is a surface-to-air missile (SAM) that can strike long-range targets at all altitudes. Capable of reaching speeds in excess of Mach 2, Patriots are produced by U.S. defense contractors Lockheed Martin and Raytheon, and each one costs around $3 million. Meanwhile, a typical quadcopter drone can travel 80 km/h (50 mph) tops and can be bought on Amazon for about $200.

(Excerpt) Read more at futurism.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Military/Veterans; Science
KEYWORDS: drone; overkill; patriot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

1 posted on 03/18/2017 7:24:14 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Right up there with using two million-dollar Tomahawks to flatten some empty tents!

Who knew Patriot could see and track something that small?


2 posted on 03/18/2017 7:26:18 AM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

A few rounds from a .50 cal would have had the same effect for just a few lousy dollars.


3 posted on 03/18/2017 7:28:23 AM PDT by Psalm 73 ("Gentlemen, you can't fight in here - this is the War Room".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Probably shouldn’t be in the news.


4 posted on 03/18/2017 7:28:59 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBrow
Right up there with using two million-dollar Tomahawks to flatten some empty tents!

In a long sustained war, this kind of thing will seriously impact the war fighting capability. High-tech weapons can be effective, good for troops on the ground, but it is economically impossible to produce a vast number of them. It cannot be made quickly either.

5 posted on 03/18/2017 7:33:06 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (dead parakeet + lost fishing gear = freep all day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

A) “When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail”

B) Someone hates quadcopter drones.


6 posted on 03/18/2017 7:35:54 AM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
Worse. It is on YouTube posted by Army Materiel Command Headquarters.

AUSA 2017 - GEN David Perkins, Commanding General, U.S. TRADOC

7 posted on 03/18/2017 7:36:56 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (dead parakeet + lost fishing gear = freep all day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

I approve in the sense that it was worth demonstrating this capability in the field. Once. Now let’s be thrifty and use bullets for future targets of this kind . . . except for special circumstances.


8 posted on 03/18/2017 7:38:01 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Where are they getting drones for $200? I pay $450. at Sam’s Club for mine!


9 posted on 03/18/2017 7:45:16 AM PDT by donozark (Lock HER up! Lock HIM up! Kick 'em out! Build the wall! GO TRUMP!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1
Sometimes they even have trouble shooting it down.

IDF fails 3 times to bring down drone over Golan

Apparent air-to-air strike and two Patriot missiles couldn’t take out UAV that flew into Israeli airspace from Syria

10 posted on 03/18/2017 7:46:58 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (dead parakeet + lost fishing gear = freep all day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Maybe they should have used a $2 flyswatter.


11 posted on 03/18/2017 7:48:44 AM PDT by PistolPaknMama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

A fifth grader has already develped the concept: anti-drone drone.


12 posted on 03/18/2017 7:50:40 AM PDT by dasboot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dasboot

“A fifth grader has already develped the concept: anti-drone drone.”

Yes!

Use kamikaze drones to bring down enemy drones. We have teenagers that could do it from their family rooms with an internet connection and a high end gaming console.


13 posted on 03/18/2017 8:06:25 AM PDT by Grampa Dave ( Remember during Trump Tower Spydgate, there were No American fingerprints; just Obama's...!!!!:))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

I hear that the Army is developing a laser weapon to take out drones. It makes sense. The problem with laser weapons against manned aircraft is that the mass of the airframe is so great that to achieve a damaging temperature rise with a distant laser is extremely difficult. With the much lower mass of the drone, not so much.

If I’m the enemy, I might try to put corner reflectors on the drone, but I think all that does is stress the dynamic range of the tracking sensor and reduce the payload of the drone. I can switch in attenuators (sun glasses) and keep on burning.


14 posted on 03/18/2017 8:15:36 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (Psephomancers for Hillary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave

A Patriot is a kamikaze drone, with a 150 km range and mach-2+ speed. I think you are vastly underestimating the difficulty of air intercept, but I wouldn’t dismiss the idea out of hand.

My first recourse would be to use a simple noise jammer (like we do against garage door and mobile phone IEDs) to cut off communications with its base, and maybe a low cost anti-radiation missile to attack the base. For a military drone, (not on sale at Amazon, yet) the simple counter-counter would be to have an autonomous mode when jamming is detected, which might be something as simple as a “take me home”, or “attack the jammer” routine.

I might prefer a shotgun over a 0.50 cal, for lots of obvious reasons, number 1 being fratricide. Unfortunately, the Geneva convention on the law of land warfare outlaws shotguns. I would claim that the law of land warfare does not apply to drones. Adding a shotgun to the armament of every rifle squad would be cheap, and would enhance morale in many ways as well as reducing the probability of a drone returning safely to base to a value indistinguishable from zero.


15 posted on 03/18/2017 8:34:48 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (Psephomancers for Hillary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets

4 Ways to take down a drone:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X27-2WDIZR0&t=216s

Number 4 is using trained eagles. I saw two hawk strikes on my bird feeder Tuesday during the pi-day blizzard. Very impressive critters, trust me.


16 posted on 03/18/2017 8:47:26 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (Psephomancers for Hillary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 73
A few rounds from a .50 cal would have had the same effect for just a few lousy dollars.



17 posted on 03/18/2017 9:11:59 AM PDT by COBOL2Java ("Game over, man, game over!" (my advice to DemocRATs))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Time to buy stock in Raytheon, eh?


18 posted on 03/18/2017 9:16:39 AM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets
This drone got a little too close to a mother eagle's nest
19 posted on 03/18/2017 9:18:59 AM PDT by COBOL2Java ("Game over, man, game over!" (my advice to DemocRATs))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets

“Unfortunately, the Geneva convention on the law of land warfare outlaws shotguns.”

It does no such thing.

L


20 posted on 03/18/2017 9:21:45 AM PDT by Lurker (America burned the witch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson