Posted on 03/25/2017 5:00:30 PM PDT by Beave Meister
During the Senate confirmation hearings for Neil Gorsuch, several democrats suggested that Trumps nominee was unfit to serve because he believes in the Constitution. Seeing as how the job of Supreme Court Justice is to determine the Constitutionality of things, this seems like a pretty bizarre argument, but democrats arent known for being rational. Speaking of which, California democrat Kamala Harris says she wont be voting to confirm Gorsuch because he bases his decisions on the law instead of feelings.
Harris tweeted out this stunning statement today:
Judge Gorsuch has consistently valued legalisms over real lives. I won't support his nomination.
Legalism? Oh I get it, she means the law. How dare a judge make rulings on what the law actually says when peoples feelings might be hurt, right? After all, we are a nation of feelings, not laws. Gosh, now that I have written that out it seems like the opposite might be true.
(Excerpt) Read more at downtrend.com ...
Feelings,
Feelings, nothing more than feelings,
Trying to forget my feelings of love.
Tears drops rolling down on my face,
Trying to forget my feelings of love.
Seems she’s in direct violation of her own oath.
She is the walking argument for not allowing women in any form of politcs and law, whatsoever.
She is the walking argument for not allowing women in any form of politcs and law, whatsoever.
________________________
I have often thought that women’s suffrage was a mistake. Perhaps after the barefoot and pregnant stage.
Sorry but I cannot disrespect rocks or hammers, so I cannot leave the box comment.
Twenty Five-ish years ago Bill Clinton told Sister Soulja to shove it.
Now we have her equivalent touted as future Presidential material.
Feelings, nothing more than feelings,
Feelings, wooo-oo-oooo feelings........
The RAT Party’s Poster Child.
Harris is a shoe in for the Democrat nomination in 2020.
She just got elected to the Senate. Already they are pushing her for president??? Really????
Reminds me of Obama’s Senate experience, come to think of it.........Barely elected, already planning his presidential run...........
Isn’t Harris actually just nothing more than an airhead celebrity? Didn’t she have a show on IDHD?
And also not a natural born citizen.
I’m still predicting a Warren-Harris ticket
Stunningly stupid headline, too.
"He rules with law" is either native ignorance, or deliberately ambiguous, too. Cleverly misleading; Does "law" include both the Constitution and the Bill of Rights? Or legislated law subject to elimination or change at any time?
These morons just keep trying, don't they. And the ZIVs take it hook line and sinker.
Why am I even reading this krap?
Moving right along...
Whatever happened to “hard cases make bad law.”
because he bases his decisions on the law instead of feelings.
= = =
She was CA Attorney General.
Let’s use that method they used on Trump. His campaign statements, you know, have tainted his character.
‘Judges should use their feelings.’
Use it on the CA cases she started and left for the next AG.
She is a real Witch. A cross between Boxer the nut, and Fineswien the sophisticate.
And .. I think she’s the one who plans to run for Gov of CA. Now ... I’m really glad I’m moving.
Kamala is just following in the footsteps of all of the other stupid RAT-commie NAG-HAG wymyn legislators.
Sober up dude!
Soros arranged it and it worked like a charm the first time with Barack Omugabe!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.