Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

With eye toward KSC, Dream Chaser takes to California skies for tests
eccux.com ^ | 9/1/2017 | unknown

Posted on 09/03/2017 9:26:46 AM PDT by rktman

Sierra Nevada Corp.’s Dream Chaser spacecraft as it took off from NASA’s Armstrong Flight Research Center in California for a captive carry flight test on Aug. 30, 2017.(Photo: NASA)

If you blocked out the background scenery earlier this week, you could imagine the mini-shuttle was gliding through blue sky toward a landing at Kennedy Space Center, its future home.

Sierra Nevada Corp.’s Dream Chaser actually was hovering above the Mojave Desert in California at NASA’s Armstrong Flight Research Center, tethered securely to a Chinook helicopter.

The so-called “captive carry” test was another step toward returning a winged spacecraft to orbit, with the Dream Chaser shooting for a mid-2020 launch from the Space Coast and landing at KSC’s former shuttle runway.

“I know that runway and I know that area like the back of my hand,” said Steve Lindsey, SNC vice president of Space Exploration Systems, who landed at KSC’s Shuttle Landing Facility five times as a shuttle pilot or commander. “Really looking forward to the day we actually get to fly into Kennedy and fly back into the SLF.”

(Excerpt) Read more at eccux.com ...


TOPICS: Astronomy; Business/Economy; Science
KEYWORDS: flyable; space
Roger that. Flyable reusable vehicle again. Guess it'll be a mixed bag of crewed vehicles.
1 posted on 09/03/2017 9:26:47 AM PDT by rktman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rktman

2 posted on 09/03/2017 9:31:43 AM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

3 posted on 09/03/2017 9:33:00 AM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

Thanks. Saw something about it being enclosed in a fairing for launch in the latest iteration. Don’t remember where I saw it though. I like it, but that’s just me.


4 posted on 09/03/2017 9:41:12 AM PDT by rktman (Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: gaijin
Didn't I see that thing crash in the opening sequence of The Six Million Dollar Man?


5 posted on 09/03/2017 10:03:03 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo
We can REBUILD him..! We HAVE the technology..!


6 posted on 09/03/2017 10:07:03 AM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: gaijin
Whoops! Much better:


7 posted on 09/03/2017 10:08:47 AM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0CPJ-AbCsT8&feature=youtu.be&t=90


8 posted on 09/03/2017 10:12:07 AM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

I was thinking it looks like the old “lifting body” aircraft of the 60s.


9 posted on 09/03/2017 10:19:54 AM PDT by Flick Lives (#CNNblackmail)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Flick Lives

10 posted on 09/03/2017 10:25:48 AM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Heck
No need to leave the state. Launch and land at Vandenberg.


11 posted on 09/03/2017 10:50:00 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

LOL! Well, they do launch stuff from Vandy. The shuttle was acoustically too much for the surrounding environment or something. Coulda cause the San Andreas to go off.


12 posted on 09/03/2017 10:53:26 AM PDT by rktman (Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: rktman; BenLurkin

Launching to the east reduces fuel costs. Fuel costs are not a consideration for Minuteman test, since trajectories can be scaled, but if you want to achieve orbit, it’s a big deal. East of KSC is water, east of Vandenberg is America. The debris from a failed launch landing in Austin or New Orleans would be a public relations disaster.


13 posted on 09/03/2017 11:36:34 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (Psephomancers for Hillary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets
🚀. Debris landing in Texas and LA. Think Columbia. That was a crappy day for everybody involved. More so for the astronauts.
14 posted on 09/03/2017 11:43:54 AM PDT by rktman (Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: rktman

The mass of the space vehicle is a fraction of the mass of the booster, and the nastiness of the fuel multiplies the effect.

A booster rocket failed at Edwards once, and although there were no casualties, a whole section of dependent housing was closed down and abandoned.


15 posted on 09/03/2017 11:55:54 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (Psephomancers for Hillary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets

Yup. There were a lot of things to consider when we first started thinking about launching shuttles from Vandy. Heck the transit time for the External Tanks from New Orleans to the launch site was around 30 days. A couple of my work buddies made those few trips. I only did the NOLA to KSC ones. LOL!


16 posted on 09/03/2017 12:07:09 PM PDT by rktman (Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Roger that. Flyable reusable vehicle again. Guess it’ll be a mixed bag of crewed vehicles.

...

I think the Dream Chaser that got the NASA contract will be cargo only.


17 posted on 09/29/2017 2:04:50 PM PDT by Moonman62 (Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
Sounds like it so far but maybe getting that camel's nose under the tent...... That would be my approach if I was Sierra Nevada Corp. 🚀
18 posted on 09/29/2017 3:55:08 PM PDT by rktman (Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: rktman

The original design was to carry people, and I’m sure they’d like that, but it seems that capsules are the most economical and safest way to go for people.

The Air Force seems to love the winged platform for testing, though.


19 posted on 09/29/2017 4:55:49 PM PDT by Moonman62 (Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson