Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/16/2017 4:40:57 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: BenLurkin

In 0bama’s world it would have been ‘well okay’ but in Trump’s world: “Oh hey, you really don’t want to be going there”.


2 posted on 10/16/2017 4:43:01 PM PDT by SkyDancer ( ~ Just Consider Me A Random Fact Generator ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Rut Roh

BYE BYE


3 posted on 10/16/2017 4:43:55 PM PDT by Thomas Truxtun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

4 posted on 10/16/2017 4:44:19 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (You can't have totalitarian globalist government if the peasants are armed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

If it does I predict that North Korea will never know the outcome of it.


5 posted on 10/16/2017 4:45:03 PM PDT by TigersEye (0bama. The Legacy is a lie. The lie is the Legacy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

The basic issue at play is that countries that continually threaten nuclear attacks on another country to reduce that country to ashes cannot be permitted to obtain nuclear weapons and their development must be prevented at any cost

North Korea and Iran are two notable examples


6 posted on 10/16/2017 4:47:27 PM PDT by rdcbn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin
Oh Noes Rocket Man.
7 posted on 10/16/2017 4:50:52 PM PDT by Autonomous User (During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Yawn


8 posted on 10/16/2017 4:51:30 PM PDT by Jonny7797
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Just communists, democrats and media trying to distract Trump.


10 posted on 10/16/2017 4:52:30 PM PDT by JPJones (Who is FOR tariffs? George Washington, Ronald Reagan and Me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Well, a nuclear war with DPRK would be quite brief.


12 posted on 10/16/2017 4:54:25 PM PDT by Jim Noble (Single payer is coming. Which kind do you like)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

And their people will be able to tell the difference how? If it come down to just the difference between being on fire roasted alive and not, you have already lost the war and the rest to come.


15 posted on 10/16/2017 5:01:55 PM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists...Socialists...Fascists & AntiFa...Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Basically Bush Sr, Clinton and Obama removed our leverage by denuking South Korea. Now Kim asks for US/International full disarmament ...

And you all think Russia and China do not stand behind this? It is for their benefits to put up America as some kind of bully which needs disarmed


20 posted on 10/16/2017 5:27:09 PM PDT by JudgemAll (Democrats Fed. job-security Whorocracy & hate:hypocrites must be gay like us or be tested/crucifiedc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Let’s take the NK dictator at his word, and ask, the world, if such a threat to NK from the U.S. exists, then why - what are the conditions that cause it to exist, and what would in fact set if off.

We can sum all the many details up in few general points.

There is no peace agreement from the Korean War, just an armistice (agreed on temporary halt in fighting) so a state of war officially still exists, between North Korea and South Korea & the United Nations Unified Command operating under the operational control of the United States. The signers of the armistice were the China-North Korea Command and the United Nations Command.

The North Korean response since the signing of the armistice has been continued belligerence and continued acts of aggression by North Korea against the nation of South Korea, South Korean leaders and South Korea individuals, on Korean soil and inside other nations, as well as against U.S. military units & persons and U.S. civilians, and against Japanese citizens on Japanese soil (abductions of Japanese civilians, taken to North Korea).

Instead of moving to, preparing for and negotiating for peace, North Korea has continually threatened war and prepared for war, while attempting nuclear geopolitical blackmail to try to obtain concessions from South Korea and the U.S.

If there is any U.S. threat towards North Korea it is a responsible response to the posture of North Korea and its continued belligerent history since signing the armistice.

What North Korea wants is it does not want the U.S. to be helping to protect South Korea. That is not going to happen. If that is what constitutes the threat to North Korea, it is a condition it has created.


26 posted on 10/16/2017 5:45:30 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Hold off till Winter.I need to work on my tan.


29 posted on 10/16/2017 6:10:10 PM PDT by Renegade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson