Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TV Ratings: Oscars Drop to All-Time Low 26.5 Million Viewers [-19%]
www.hollywoodreporter.com ^ | 03-05-2018 | Michael O'Connell

Posted on 03/05/2018 1:10:56 PM PST by Red Badger

The telecast stumbles an unfortunate 19 percent from 2017.

A comparatively uneventful Oscar telecast led the way on TV Sunday night — though updated numbers have the telecast somewhat predictably stumbling to an all-time low.

The telecast, nearly four hours long, stumbled 19 percent from the previous year to 26.5 million viewers. That's easily the least-watched Oscars in history, trailing 2008 by more than 5 million. Overnight returns had the lengthy ABC telecast averaging a 18.9 rating among households between 8 and 11 p.m. ET. Compared to the same stat for 2017, the night the wrong best picture winner was named, that was down a more modest 16 percent.

The 2017 Academy Awards, which earned a 22.4 overnight rating, ultimately fetched 32.9 million viewers for ABC — as well as a handsome 9.1 rating among adults 18-49. Still, those numbers reflected the second-lowest in Academy history. (ABC did not immediately report the adults 18-49 rating for Sunday's Oscars, and Nielsen won't widely distribute that information until Tuesday.)

The night was not as political as many recent award shows, with showings of partisanship few and far between. The fallout and response to the exposure of sexual harassment and assault in the entertainment industry was an obvious through line — and honorees like best actress winner Frances McDormand made stands for inclusivity and representation in the industry. Host Jimmy Kimmel seems to have earned praise for another solid performance during his second consecutive year on stage.

But the writing was largely on the wall for lows, either way. All three marquee events of the U.S. TV calendar thus far — the Golden Globe Awards, the Grammys and the Super Bowl — were off significantly from the 2017.

At three hours and 50 minutes, Sunday's Oscars may have only passed last year's runtime by one minute, but it managed to rank as the longest telecast in over a decade. Not since 2007 has an Academy Awards ceremony lasted that long.

And it wasn't exactly a night of box office sloucher nominees. Though top winner The Shape of Water ($57 million domestic to date) hasn't exactly been a runaway hit, it certainly outpaced 2017's winner Moonlight ($28 million) and actually ranks as the top-grossing best picture winner in five years. And Dunkirk, the only other film to nab more than two wins on Sunday, took $188 million at the domestic box office — just a little more than Get Out, which was up in multiple categories and saw a writing win for scribe-director Jordan Peele.

Here's a look at the last ten Oscars. 2017: 32.9 million viewers
 2016: 34.4 million viewers 
2015: 37.3 million viewers 
2014: 43.7 million viewers 
2013: 40.4 million viewers 
2012: 39.5 million viewers
 2011: 37.9 million viewers 
2010: 41.6 million viewers 
2009: 36.9 million viewers
 2008: 31.8 million viewers*



TOPICS: Arts/Photography; Business/Economy; Music/Entertainment; Society; TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: 1moretime; academyawards; hollywood; jimmykimmel; kimmel; oscar; oscars; ratings
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last
To: Red Badger
yep. Everytime, there's a new gag that I missed.

This time, it was Lloyd Bridges, striking a pose in front of a picture of himself, striking the same pose. :-)

"Get me Hamm on Five, hold the Mayo."

41 posted on 03/05/2018 2:08:33 PM PST by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

It used to be fun to watch when you actually liked the actors and actresses and the gowns were fabulous. Today you not only dislike the people, the clothes are awful. Each actress tries to see how low her dress can go and the one who gets closest to her pubic bone gets to scream #MeToo


42 posted on 03/05/2018 2:19:03 PM PST by McGavin999 ("The press is impotent when it abandons itself to falsehood."Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wbill

Check the Radar Range!.................


43 posted on 03/05/2018 2:21:44 PM PST by Red Badger (The people who call Trump a tyrant are the same people who want the president to confiscate weapons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Here's a look at the last eleven Oscars. 2018 is really worse than 2008 when we had a total population of 304 million compared to 327 million today.

2018: 26.5 million viewers


2017: 32.9 million viewers


2016: 34.4 million viewers


2015: 37.3 million viewers


2014: 43.7 million viewers


2013: 40.4 million viewers


2012: 39.5 million viewers


2011: 37.9 million viewers


2010: 41.6 million viewers


2009: 36.9 million viewers


2008: 31.8 million viewers*


44 posted on 03/05/2018 2:27:13 PM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kabar

All the old Oscar Viewers are dying off, and the millenials couldn’t care less about the phony awards shows..............................


45 posted on 03/05/2018 2:29:33 PM PST by Red Badger (The people who call Trump a tyrant are the same people who want the president to confiscate weapons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Oscars have turned in a propaganda production. This time there was, I heard, lecturing regarding illegal aliens and how wonderful they are.


46 posted on 03/05/2018 2:33:36 PM PST by apocalypto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Folks, just like Obama & Clinton have killed the Democrat Party, the “Hollywood Elite, Low Life” have killed the Academy Awards. If the TV viewership numbers are anywhere near correct, that means that only seven (7) or eight (8) percent (26 Million) of Americans tuned in last evening....a literal, dismal, massive failure. Take that...Jimmy Kimmel!!!


47 posted on 03/05/2018 2:39:43 PM PST by JLAGRAYFOX (Defeat both the Republican (e) & Democrat (e) political parties....Forever!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

An all-time low! Congratulations Jimmy Kimmel and all you Hollywood a**holes.


48 posted on 03/05/2018 2:56:08 PM PST by Rummyfan (In any war between the civilized man and the savage, support the civilized man. Support Israel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999
It used to be fun to watch when you actually liked the actors and actresses and the gowns were fabulous. Today you not only dislike the people

Some winners in one of the lesser categories came up, and the man thanked his husband and the woman thanked her wife. Ugh....

49 posted on 03/05/2018 3:02:44 PM PST by Rummyfan (In any war between the civilized man and the savage, support the civilized man. Support Israel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Snickering Hound

Is Jennifer Lawrence really tall? Or is Jodie Foster really short?!

50 posted on 03/05/2018 3:04:53 PM PST by Rummyfan (In any war between the civilized man and the savage, support the civilized man. Support Israel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan
p07

Jennifer Lawrence is 5'9" and wearing heels.

Jodi Foster is 5'3" and wearing her lesbian flats.

51 posted on 03/05/2018 3:16:15 PM PST by Snickering Hound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

52 posted on 03/05/2018 3:37:06 PM PST by OttawaFreeper ("If I had to go to war again, I'd bring lacrosse players" Conn Smythe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

It’s our fault for not wanting to be ignored, demeaned, abused, and controlled.


53 posted on 03/05/2018 4:05:27 PM PST by YogicCowboy ("I am not entirely on anyone's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - J. R. R. Tolkien)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Clearly, the American people are tired of the crap from Hollywood. Too much intrigue, he said, she said stuff. Too much soap opera stuff.


54 posted on 03/05/2018 4:13:11 PM PST by upchuck (Keep a sharp lookout. The best is yet to come.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

5’9” to 5’3”.

Jennifer Lawrence is two inches taller than co-star in Hunger Games, Josh Hutcherson.

I read the book. Katniss was petite, second smallest candidate, as I recall; lethal long-range archery was what saved her. Peeta was actually big and strong, and the actor who played Cato, Alexander Ludwig, auditioned for that role, while the actress, Isabelle Fuhrman, who played his partner, Clove, tried out for Katniss.

Ludwig at 6’2”, and Fuhrman at 5’3”, would have been better, but lacked the current buzz to get the lead roles. If Fuhrman can sing, then she would have been far better: Katniss had a beautiful singing voice; it is pivotal to the story.

Lawrence has talent and presence, but she was not really appropriate for the role, and she cannot really sing.

She should shut up and not sing but act.


55 posted on 03/05/2018 4:26:33 PM PST by YogicCowboy ("I am not entirely on anyone's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - J. R. R. Tolkien)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: YogicCowboy
p07

She should have an award for convincing Weinstein that she found him smart, funny and attractive.

56 posted on 03/05/2018 4:46:06 PM PST by Snickering Hound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Just like the NFL. Down nearly 20% for 2 years in a row.
Nominating terrible movies just because they are edgy and has “diversity” actors.

Actress Frances McDormand wants movies to be made by quota or she won’t make them. She herself would never get hired again as she is not the person the writer wrote about. She would have to act the part but with quotas she would not be eligible anymore. She is none of the characters so she would be unemployed.


57 posted on 03/05/2018 9:51:02 PM PST by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson