To: ransomnote
Paving the way for military tribunals for former military deep state members?
2 posted on
10/13/2019 6:36:49 PM PDT by
LukeL
To: ransomnote
I foresee Hunter Biden being brought up on charges
5 posted on
10/13/2019 6:51:13 PM PDT by
VeniVidiVici
(Democrats are worse than Communists)
To: ransomnote
Begani was charged with attempted sexual abuse of a child about a month after retiring from the Navy Why could this not have been turned over to civilian authorities?
6 posted on
10/13/2019 6:53:23 PM PDT by
Michael.SF.
(Youth, speed and energy can always be overcome with experience and treachery.)
To: ransomnote
Once you sign on the line...
8 posted on
10/13/2019 6:55:26 PM PDT by
Openurmind
(The ultimate test of a moral society is the kind of world it leaves to its children. ~ D. Bonhoeffer)
To: ransomnote
Convict and execute him, as civilian or retiree.
9 posted on
10/13/2019 7:00:01 PM PDT by
Reno89519
(No Amnesty! No Catch-and-Release! Just Say No to All Illegal Aliens! Arrest & Deport!)
To: ransomnote
A controversial legal opinion that determined court-martialing military retirees was unconstitutional has been withdrawn.
12 posted on
10/13/2019 7:08:17 PM PDT by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
To: Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; 2ndDivisionVet; azishot; ...
13 posted on
10/13/2019 7:08:43 PM PDT by
bitt
To: ransomnote
I was confused at first, but now I understand, the was inactive reserve status. When I left I signed a statement saying I understand during this period I am still subject to it.
16 posted on
10/13/2019 7:12:28 PM PDT by
dila813
(Voting for Trump to Punish Trumpets!me tking public being de)
To: ransomnote
Retired officers are forever subject to military prosecution under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, even for non-military crimes committed in post-retirement civilian life. Take note, LtGen James Clapper, USAF (Retired).
19 posted on
10/13/2019 8:21:40 PM PDT by
Always A Marine
("When you strike at a king, you must kill him" - Ralph Waldo Emerson)
To: ransomnote
I know a retiree who got called back to active duty and goes on trial this week. First I’ve heard this was Probably not legal.
20 posted on
10/13/2019 8:41:18 PM PDT by
11th_VA
To: ransomnote
actually an interesting appeal.
Below is the opinion that has been withdrawn.
"Retired reservists who do not collect a retirement pay until they are 60-years-old do not fall under the UCMC’s jurisdiction — creating what a panel of three judges in July labeled “disparate treatment” among retirees.
"Congress has determined that some, but not all, military retirees should remain subject to the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) while they are retired," Navy Capt. James Crisfield wrote in the opinion in July.
“Accordingly, the sections of the UCMJ subjecting regular component retirees to UCMJ jurisdiction are unconstitutional,” Crisfield added."
21 posted on
10/13/2019 8:52:02 PM PDT by
stylin19a
(2016 - Best.Election.Of.All.Times.Ever.In.The.History.Of.Ever)
To: ransomnote
Rather than a political tool which is improper and illegal political charges, political legal actions are federal or Civil court actions. The military should by matter of legal house keeping, establish, precedent that military cases are UCMJ and political attacks remanded to no military courts.
22 posted on
10/13/2019 8:57:00 PM PDT by
Jumper
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson