Posted on 07/08/2020 4:13:08 PM PDT by SunkenCiv
“No because there never was a big bang.”
It was more like a sizzle-pop... I was there..... Or was that last weekend?
Is our Universe really the only one?The idea of multi-universes or dimensions has been kicked around in works of science fiction for decades.A new theory that hopes to solve one of the biggest problems in physics, may have rewritten our perception of time, and found a way through the Big Bang.
Is there an outer edge to the universe that is supposedly expanding? Sure would like to know what lies beyond it..........
Negative mass would depend on which way one’s scales measured, wouldn’t it? The other universe would likely believe we were measuring negative mass.
(And I might be skinny in the alternate universe!)
That’s the nature of astrophysics research. Most data is observational, there are few ‘controlled’ experiments, and so it’s really about coming up with a mathematical model/theory that explains what’s been observed, and that hasn’t been disproved by any experimental or observational data.
If you could propose a mathematical model in which the universe is made of conscious/sentient particles, and could explain all observed phenomena with this model - and blamed any phenomena that weren’t completely explained on the spontaneous unpredictable behavior of the ‘conscious particles’, your theory could be just as valid as any other - if it could not be observationally or mathematically disproved.
Yeah all the peer reviewed researched that gave us global warming and allcthe evolution hoaxes people built careers around to discover it was all bssed on lies.
Yeah peer review is academic code for circle-jerk nowadays.
Kind of ... its really that modern physics is progressing on esoteric mathematical formulation ... not empirical investigation.
Yeah. That’s a good way of describing it.
In the first 10 replies. Freezers never disappoint.
What astrophysicists and most other scientists fail to notice or consider when they draw up their theories......
is that....
They are using the mathematics that was ALSO PART of the creation of the universe. The universe doesn’t work without the math. So, without the math, the scientific theories would not even exist. Where did the math (or as I describe it, the ‘rules’) come from. Before matter and the forces that control that matter, there had to be the rules.
The Patty Duke Show 1963 - 1966 Opening and Closing Theme (With Snippet) Remastered
The Parent Trap Trailer
Antimatter has opposite charge but normal mass. Matter with truly negative mass is hypothetically called “exotic matter”, and would be a necessary component of things like wormholes, warp drive, etc. And if it interacts with normal matter, instead of exploding as pure electromagnetic energy it would just cancel out.
Oooh! I wonder if we can vacation there. Have to join the White Lives Matter movement of course.
perfect analogy! Trekkie here
For every action there is an opposite reaction.
Of course!
Didn’t you watch Counterpart? ;)
I agree, but this also begs the question of are the rules absolute and applicable everywhere, or are they dynamic, and only apply in specific places/circumstances?'. Further, are there 'rules' that define when and where the 'sub-rules' do and do not apply?
In every revolution, there’s one man with a vision!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
