Posted on 05/07/2021 9:26:02 AM PDT by Wallace T.
Comrades, the Washington State ministry of COVID compliance is going to join in other regional blue state totalitarians and create a tiered system of freedom for vaccinated and non-vaccinated citizens. The out-of-control dictators are never going to give up the power they have taken under the auspices of COVID mitigation.
According to the latest rules from Washington State Governor Jay Inslee there will be two sections for spectator events and religious and faith based organizations (churches) that “allows facilities to increase capacity by adding sections for vaccinated attendees. The change, which is effective immediately, outlines the guidelines for vaccinated sections at sporting events, graduations, religious services and other similar activities.”
(Excerpt) Read more at theconservativetreehouse.com ...
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Separate but equal, with fancy armbands to segregate the state approved from the disapproved.
The church where we are a member is segregating by vaccination status but still requiring masks. We haven’t been there in 5 years.
The church we are now attending doesn’t do masks.
From some of the reading I have been doing, vaccinated people are super spreaders. Our area-wide National Day of Prayer Service was for the most part maskless. You could definitely feel the presence of the Holy Spirit.
Eighty years ago, armbands to indicate who is disapproved by the state were used by a certain large nation in Central Europe and the nations it conquered. We know how that ended.
Our Orthodox Priests around here have been encouraging ALL of us to get vaccinated, in order to get back to NORMAL worship before the end of the year!!!!
NORMAL means no special vaccine sections, no masks, singing, venerating icons, hugging and kissing each other, and lunch (maybe real Serbian Picnics) or coffee hour after Divine Liturgy!!!!
I’m fully vaccinated, but I don’t need a Nazi armband to attend Divine Liturgy!!!!
3% of people are super spreaders. We discovered this before vaccines.
Riots are ok, though
Turn your local clergyman into a cop. That’s going to turn out well. Or, exactly as planned.
This distancing has been great. You don’t have to smell
the person next to you or vise/versa.
F*** all of these tryants and their b.s. I will drop out of society entirely before I’ll be coerced into taking their useless poison jab.
Unreal how the sheeple fell (and, are still falling) for all of this.
Even, here 😢
Yeah, we know how that ended. Unfortunately this time the enemy is us.
Yeah, keep those vaccinated people away from me - I don't want them shedding all over me!
Whatever happened to the separation of Church and state? If people allow this happen, then you deserve what you get.
That’s Congress.
This is a state. States have extensive general police powers including public health lawmaking.
This proof of vaccination is going to be an unstoppable train.
The Cross vs Hooked Cross (Hakenkreuz / Swastika). The Nazi government of Washington State needs to be reigned in as they're violating the Nuremberg Code for permissible medical experiments.
The Nuremberg Code (1947) - Permissible Medical Experiments
The great weight of the evidence before us to effect that certain types of medical experiments on human beings, when kept within reasonably well-defined bounds, conform to the ethics of the medical profession generally. The protagonists of the practice of human experimentation justify their views on the basis that such experiments yield results for the good of society that are unprocurable by other methods or means of study. All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.
The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results justify the performance of the experiment.
The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability or death.
The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.
http://www.cirp.org/library/ethics/nuremberg/
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.