Posted on 08/23/2021 10:27:51 AM PDT by BRL
I work for a large corporation and I am quite certain that they are very strongly considering mandating the vaccination for all of the employees.
So Pfizer gets approved today. On the surface, that seems like a bad thing. However, as I think about it, how does the company use the approval of one vaccine to make a mandate for all of the employees. It seems to me if they mandate the vaccine then they must mandate the approved vaccine , but if they mandate the approved vaccine then two thirds of their workforce is working without the approved vaccine.
I think this can twist into a real cluster quickly for corporations that use the "approval" as the basis of justifying the vaccine mandate.
Was it even approved? Or was the EUA extended?
Approval without a control group and long-term data is criminal fraud.
They can simply mandate vaccination and the people nervous about taking a vaccine that the FDA hasn’t blessed can get the Pfizer one. Should eliminate that objection entirely. And that would mean something if that objection hadn’t been a strawman in the first place, as we can see by the goalposts being moved by the anti-vax crowd.
Good thought exercise on your part.
I find it interesting that the Phizer Vaccine was approved, but there isn’t a word about the Modera Vaccine which is probably more effective. Do you think Phizer might have “More Grease” with the FDA than the Canadian based Modera??? Old story “Follow the Money”.
A perfect way to shrink our military by 30%!
Simple fascist solution; grandfather the already vaxxed in, and tell the yet to be vaxxed to bend over. Be happy, it’s for your own good!
CDC will say you are fully vaxed 8 months after J&J or 2nd Moderna then must have booster to be fully backed, Pfizer boost recommended for all, only boost fully approved.
Well, it makes it harder for the nutcases to call it “experimental”, which I will miss because I know I can utterly ignore anything someone using that description posts. But I’m sure the Qtards will still have reasons for people not to take it.
EUA extended not cleared yet. It never gets approved, the proper word is cleared.
Celebrate Pfascism!
Thanks for the link—details, details.
;-)
The sociopaths will demand that kids get vaxxed anyway.
THey could just mandate any Covid vax, so those who have had them are fine, those who haven’t have more hoops to go through since there is a fully approved version available—and the companies can see themselves free of liability because the employees could get a fully approved jab.
You’re ignoring the people who have already been vaxxed with a different one.
What about them?
Do they now have to go get a Pfizer one on top of what they already have? Will they now be considered unvaxxed or will the company allow them to use the one they got even though it’s not technically approved by the FDA?
What are the repercussions of that?
You are completely jumbled in nonsense with that post.
Q-tips are generally still slaves to Trump, so denying the reality of the jabs being deadly.
If you are denying the same you are either a paid shill or haven’t done your homework.
No doubt.
No, any Covid vax will meet the corporate mandates. This just limits their liability, because at least one fully approved jab is available.
Freepvaxxers are orgasmic. How about worry about your own jabgasms?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.