Jack Posobiec @JackPosobiec Jen Psaki's PR firm is representing the Facebook whistleblower
It’s a trap
Facebook whistleblower says Facebook destabilizes democracy
https://rumble.com/vncvqt-facebook-whistleblower-says-uncensored-social-media-destabilizes-democracy.html
Facebook Whistleblower Is Leftist Activist Repped By Lawyer For ‘Whistleblower’ Behind Trump Impeachment
https://www.dailywire.com/news/facebook-whistleblower-leftist-activist-lawyer-ukraine-impeachment
I’m glad we are NOT a democracy.
Yeah, she is no whistleblower. More like a propagandist.
Now do twitter
I watched her on 60 Minutes.
She thinks Facebook does not do enough to suppress hate speech.
That means stronger suppression of dissent with the Politburo.
This whole thing is beginning to look staged.
I don’t know who is behind it, but I don’t think it’s (just) facebook or (just) the whistleblower. The activism behind this is to regulate and install censorship on social media. that’s the end game.
I suspect the reason for this new tac is because they are afraid that legal challenges to silicon valley censorship will succeed. They want this whole thing codified into law
Facebook whistleblower says Facebook destabilizes democracy
_____________________________________________
Duh. Anything and everything that destabilizes the Constitution (First Amendment) will destabilize democracy.
Facebook allows pro-communist speech. Facebook censors pro-freedom speech.
And then they took their sites offline to destroy the evidence.
Someone should as her: Does censorship destabilize democracy?
Info bit on who reps the “whistleblower.”
Her “upspeak” drives me NUTS!
Grab a clue folks, the alphabet networks is covering this . . . that should tell you right there that she is a Soros-approved spokesman.
Facebook wants its cake. That’s it. They don’t want any hassles. They should be hassled more. They want to eat their cake too, and oil the greasy wheels to get it. So they claim the moral high ground by “censoring misinformation” and fact checking and warning flags etc. See we’re good people.
They would have no problems if they just said “it’s a free speech platform. We’re not going to police the content at all. The users are free to do that, if they want to, because that’s what the ‘social’ means in ‘social media’”.
What I think we have here is a never married, no child, radical Liberal, lantern-jawed freak.
50-50 she’s a lez
bookmark
Careful who you’re rooting for in this fight.
This is being done so that the left can control Facebook at the same level as they control social media like twitter, etc.