About time
1 posted on
10/24/2021 2:20:44 PM PDT by
algore
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: algore
2 posted on
10/24/2021 2:21:57 PM PDT by
null and void
(LGBTQ = Let's Get Biden To Quit, FORK-N-A = First Uttery Cancel Kamala-Nancy-Axed)
To: algore
This is how they are going to keep the elite going after they cut off the rest of us.
4 posted on
10/24/2021 2:25:25 PM PDT by
beef
(The Chinese have a little secret—diversity is _not_ a strength.)
To: algore
Hope it turns out better than the mess they left at Ft Greeley, just down the road...
5 posted on
10/24/2021 2:26:40 PM PDT by
ASOC
(This space for rent)
To: algore
The environazis will put a stop to it.
6 posted on
10/24/2021 2:32:06 PM PDT by
BitWielder1
(I'd rather have Unequal Wealth than Equal Poverty.)
To: algore
Looking at the various sites and references, none specify exactly what the fuel is. I was hoping that the NuScale reactors would be liquid-salt thorium, but the lack of details suggest that the reactors are the traditional fast-breeder reactors. Anyone know differently?
8 posted on
10/24/2021 2:34:19 PM PDT by
asinclair
(Political hot air is a renewable energy resource)
To: algore; All
These mini-nuke things should be sprinkled all over America. They’re cheap, efficient, and can be built quickly.
9 posted on
10/24/2021 2:35:57 PM PDT by
Cobra64
(Common sense isn’t common anymore.)
To: algore
Lots of villages in Alaska get all of their electricity from diesel Caterpillar engines/generators. They use a LOT of expensive fuel. (Well, the fuel is bad enough, it is the cost of getting it to them that is really expensive!)
10 posted on
10/24/2021 2:35:59 PM PDT by
21twelve
(Ever Vigilant. Never Fearful.)
To: algore
“The Department of the Air Force announced the selection of Eielson as the host facility for this pilot reactor because it’s in the middle of nowhere, and nobody cares about Alaska anyways”.
To: algore
A 1950’s science fiction movie about to happen
16 posted on
10/24/2021 2:52:32 PM PDT by
AppyPappy
(How many fingers am I holding up, Winston? )
To: algore
Amen.. let’s have at least as many as France. A little disconcerting that it is controlled by the military. A woke, maybe not so citizen friendly military.
19 posted on
10/24/2021 2:55:25 PM PDT by
momincombatboots
(Ephesians 6... who you are really at war with.)
To: algore
I think the USAF had a reactor back in the ‘60s at their base in Greenland. Everything that is old is new again.
20 posted on
10/24/2021 2:55:44 PM PDT by
Tallguy
To: algore
Calling Jane Fonda. Calling Jane Fonda. Help us stop this before its another 3 Mile Island../s
23 posted on
10/24/2021 3:08:42 PM PDT by
Don Corleone
(leave the gun, take the canolis)
To: algore
24 posted on
10/24/2021 3:16:41 PM PDT by
Pontiac
(The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit)
To: algore
Nuclear reactors have been powering aircraft carriers for years. Why they haven’t already been used to provide secure, off grid power to military bases is beyond me.
To: algore
Wouldn’t it be nice to think we could deploy these in
population centers to ease energy needs?
I give it less than few years before some wing-nut group
would try to tap them for dirty bomb materials.
28 posted on
10/24/2021 3:24:22 PM PDT by
DoughtyOne
(Democrats, fixing things that haven't been broken, so they don't work, for over 197 years.)
To: algore
I was stationed there TDY back in 1968-1969. Loved my time there. Crew Chief remained drunk the whole time. He never got off base while I visited Fairbanks several times.
When leaving one night to fly back to “The World”, he was griping that he had been in Alaska for two weeks and had never even seen the Northern Lights.
I simply said...”Well, look up!”
32 posted on
10/24/2021 3:46:22 PM PDT by
Ruy Dias de Bivar
(4th time in FB prison this year. Reason? I wrote a quick synopsis of why I was in the last 3 times.)
To: algore
I’d have to assume that the first device of this kind has already been operational deep in the bowels of the WH...
34 posted on
10/24/2021 3:53:13 PM PDT by
SuperLuminal
(Where is another Sam Adams now that we desperately need him?)
To: algore
F-16 Viper? I hate how the modern Air Force renames their aircraft for a new model letter. The F-16 is a FALCON.
Image calling the C model of the P-51 Mustang the Chevy.
36 posted on
10/24/2021 3:53:54 PM PDT by
Alas Babylon!
(Rush, we're missing your take on all of this!)
To: algore
If they can run a nuclear sub and aircraft carrier why couldn’t they run small cities?
It’s the big nuclear plants that pose the major risks.
The small ones you could bury underground.
38 posted on
10/24/2021 4:05:25 PM PDT by
Mr. K
(No consequence of repealing obamacare is worse than obamacare itself)
To: algore
If you can stuff a reactor inside of a submarine, why not other small-scale platforms?
44 posted on
10/24/2021 11:51:44 PM PDT by
lurk
( )
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson