Posted on 10/27/2021 4:31:35 PM PDT by BenLurkin
The drug, which costs roughly 29p per tablet, was trialled on nearly 741 people who tested positive within seven days and had underlying health conditions.
Patients were given a daily course of two pills for 10 days. Of those given the medication, 79 (10.6 per cent) needed hospital care compared to 15.7 per cent in the placebo group.
Writing in the paper, the researchers said their analysis showed the pills cut the risk of hospitalisation by 32 per cent.
Fluvoxamine works by boosting the amount of serotonin in the brain, which can help to boost someone's mood.
But the hormone is also involved in regulating the immune system, and can help prevent it from overreacting and attacking healthy cells, which can be fatal.
Professor Penny Ward, a pharmaceutical physician at King's College London who was not involved in the research said: 'Fluvoxamine was identified as a possible treatment for covid based on its effects (as an antiviral) and impact on platelet function (reducing risk of inflammation).'
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
Crispy creams are a good female contraceptive makes them so fat nobody wants to boink them
Works pretty much the same for dudes...
I might add I’m almost 70. My VA doctor sent me a bottle of Ibuprofen after getting the Covid. I sh*t you not. If you think that’s great medical care you can KMA too.
So this stuff cuts hospitalization by a third. How does that stack up against Ivermectin?
(I just noticed that Ivermectin is not in the dictionary on my laptop. I had not noticed it before. Did they just take it out of the dictionary? It that the latest way to censor something? Or did I just spell it wrong?)
Or people can use HCQ/ivermectin/quercetin, zinc, Vit E and C, and maybe one or two other vitamins/minerals without needing unnecessary chemicals.
Look at the flowchart in the article per my first comment. Ivermectin is first in line, the other are dependent on your other symptoms of the biowarfare attack.
Better living through chemistry. Cha-Ching for BigPharma.
i went to a so called specialist. it started with a “i’m confused about why you are here” ...(probably because just looked at basic tests)...to by the end of it they had me wait to check out..and the reason for the wait was they had called a researcher and said “we’ve got a live one for ya” or some equivalent...and he approaches me in a waiting room of people. i had no clue that was going on.
So basically i was right that there was an issue that didnt show up on the basic tests....and they wanted me for research
A pox on all of them that don’t bother to stay up to date on studies and refuse to consider a different alternative.
Qualudes man, Ludes….😳
You can’t score ludes anymore…
Is this why some of the protocols have melatonin in them…as well as Ivermectin, doxycycline,zinc, vitaminC?
Melatonin does this.
Yes, you are right. That’s what I did, but some symptoms can persist for even months. It’s called long haul covid 19 syndrome. In my case the headache lasted for well over a month. No help from my VA doctor once again.
Yeah, until a year or so ago I thought that Medicine had advanced to individual diagnosis and treatment based on DNA and family history.
Now I find out that we have CDC Big Medicine driven recommended and enforced on one size fits all treatments [and lack of treatment].
It’s Orwellian.
The article you cite is about long haul symptoms. It has nothing to do about keeping fresh onset patients out of the hospital, neither does it provide any data about hospitalization.
It’s part of the FLCCC early treatment protocol.
They didn’t taper the meds off; abruptly stopping that sort of med isn’t good.
I think this has been happening for nearly all of covid- turns out a lot of us think so.
lawsuit aside, the target audience for this med may be limited to older patients with no history of emotional issues and who are at low risk for seratonin syndrome. OTOH the course of treatment is restricted to 10 days, which may mitigate risk in younger groups. (but is a 10 day-course unreasonable with a fast infecting virus such as Delta, when monoclonals within 10 days of positive testing may pose less risk?)
Don’t forget the big D.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.