Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CDC Admits It Never Monitored VAERS for COVID Vaccine Safety Signals
The Defender ^ | 06/21/22 | Josh Guetzkow, Ph.D.

Posted on 06/22/2022 2:46:29 PM PDT by george76

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last
To: george76; Sioux-san
Independent VAERS analysis. There’s a link in the article to the (now missing original) VAERS record for this 2-year old child: (VAERS_ID1887456).

***UPDATE on Death Record of 2-Year Old from Alaska SCRUBBED from VAERS***

from the article:

Based on this one example, we can conclude that it is certainly possible that VAERS is deliberately removing any records from ever being seen by the public that are clearly very incriminating. Is it just coincidence, that the record which the public would never have known about is the record of a 2 year old, who would have been ineligible to receive the Covid-19 inoculations (outside of a clinical trial)? And whom furthermore died within six hours of the inoculation in a horrible manner?

41 posted on 06/23/2022 6:48:40 AM PDT by yelostar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

“The briefing document states, “CDC will perform PRR data mining on a weekly basis or as needed.”

So apparently you and the Doctor of Sociology/Criminology are in a position to know what “or as needed” means more than CDC personnel.

So if they aren’t routinely performing tests that you think need to be done it’s because “the CDC won’t do PRR analysis on their VAERS system”.

Not because they know enough about what’s posted on VAERS to recognize when PRR data mining is needed. Because what would they know.

Got it.


42 posted on 06/23/2022 12:18:43 PM PDT by Pelham (World War III is entering on cat's feet. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Pelham
Bullshit.

You got nothing.

Apparently, what you're saying is that, after two years of lockdown, masking, double shots and double boosters, and three or more variants, teen heart ailments, and sudden adult deaths, the CDC still didn't find any "as needed" reason to do PRR analysis?

I don't know why I waste my time with you.

-PJ

43 posted on 06/23/2022 12:32:30 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too ( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: yelostar

yelostar- Regarding the potential scrubbing of VAERS data of the 2 year old who died in Alaska, I am not surprised. I ran several reports on the updated data today. Specific to Deaths for Babies, there was one 5 month old breastfed infant who died the day after her mother received her 2nd dose of Pfizer at work on 3/17/2021. I am thinking it was a cumulative effect from the first dose (The Narrative description states the 2020 for the date of inoculation and date of death. Event detail says 2021.) The State/Territory was listed as unknown, so didn’t show up in my 50 STates+DC analysis. The other Death for a Baby (1.08 years old) had Unknown State/Territory and was reported as “death by suicide, self-inflicted gun shot wound; found deceased by family member.” So, we know something is wrong with entering the age for that individual.
With the CDC Mgt. constantly changing the rules, definitions, how many times you’ve been jabbed, timing between, etc.,so what constitutes a Covid Vxx Injury will provide a conflicting message. Covid inoculates accounted for 9,991 deaths, 69% of the 14,000+ VAERS Deaths since counting started in 1990 thru June 17th, 2022 & 60% of the nearly 150,000 Serious Events in that same 30+ years.

It breaks my heart how some here on FreeRepublic downplay the dangers of the 100% unnecessary Covid inoculates. No curiosity at all about why our Government “Watchdogs” have the Data and are obligated by Law to use it for our protection and don’t even pretend to care. But then, this has been a Planned BlackOp since the beginning, so never did expect anything from Fauci, et.al. (including Mr. Operation Warp Speed).


44 posted on 06/24/2022 2:47:05 PM PDT by Sioux-san
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Sioux-san
Thanks for the reply.

The Covid wars here on FR opened a lot of people’s eyes. It was difficult to comprehend how, on a forum dedicated to human freedom, there was such an acrimonious, harsh and bitter debate. Those who recognized the underlying deception and dishonesty early on were immediately attacked and insulted - justifying why many of us were not only against the vax but also the hand-in-hand psychological operation that so obviously went along with it. That operation was carried out here by many. I went back and looked at some old posts. These were some responses I got after posting a link to an interview with David E Martin, ”mRNA vaccine injects an “operating system” into your body called “The Software of Life” - this is ‘not’ a vaccine!”

Did you sign up for Free Republic so you could give air to paranoid delusion?......../ Not more of this crap. What is the motive that drives the anti Covid Vaccine people into this?...../ Get a life, and get vaccinated!..../ If you are concerned by the more modern technology of mRNA, go ahead and opt for the Johnson & Johnson vaccine. It is an old school Adenovirus vaccine. But going through life as ignorant, doesn’t help anything...../ The song of the common cuckoo...../ This is as fake news as anything Alex Jones has ever said..../ The kook is strong in this one...../ This mutated virus technique is well understood and is used in other therapies to treat genetic diseases where the body doesn't produce certain needed proteins. Stop scaremongering...../ More anti-vaxxer pseudo-scientific crapulence..../Go away, yelotroll!..../ Got the second dose of Moderna a month ago. I feel fine. Your article is total psy-op kook fuel. Don’t fall for it

The pro-vaxxers sought to undermine and compromise VAERS data by consistently attacking it. They never let up, and it continues to this day.

The safeguards that societal institutions used to have that protected citizens are no longer operative. They not only don’t protect us, they actively seek to do harm.

45 posted on 06/24/2022 5:57:09 PM PDT by yelostar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: yelostar

Well said- I couldn’t agree with you more.


46 posted on 06/24/2022 10:33:54 PM PDT by Sioux-san
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: yelostar

The deception was apparent from the beginning. Finding any open criticism or discussion of risks associated with novel mRNA therapies was difficult. No one was allowed to openly discuss how mRNA therapies have been studied for years without making it to phase 3 trials. (Because they were deemed unsafe).

That was the first red flag for me re the gene therapies.

Lab leak suppression and cover-up was a red flag too.

Then after the vax rollouts, seeing how stridently VAERS reporting was criticized by vax shills as being unreliable was another big red flag. It was obvious that VAERS was deliberately broken — CDC and Pharma could have established effective monitoring years ago but they have chosen not to.

CDC/FDA are completely captured by the entities they are supposed to regulate. It was breathtaking to see how most healthcare professionals abandoned their oaths and deceived their patients.

Before covid, medical ethicists considered offering bribes (free donuts and lotteries, yay!) to be unethical coercion (positive coercion) — but without any debate we got punitive coercion and positive coercion to encourage people to take an experimental, unsafe and ineffective medical treatment.


47 posted on 06/24/2022 11:04:28 PM PDT by 13foxtrot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: 13foxtrot

Thanks for your insights.


48 posted on 06/25/2022 10:11:43 AM PDT by yelostar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: george76; 2ndreconmarine; Fitzcarraldo; Covenantor; Mother Abigail; EBH; Dog Gone; ...
george76 : "In a stunning development, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) last week admitted — despite assurances to the contrary
— the agency never analyzed the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) for safety signals for COVID-19 vaccines."

"The admission was revealed in response to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request submitted by Children’s Health Defense (CHD)".

"In September 2021, I published an article in The Defender in which I used the CDC’s published methodology to analyze VAERS for safety signals from COVID-19 vaccines.
The signals were loud and clear, leading me to wonder “why is nobody listening?”
Instead, I should have asked, “Is anybody even looking for them?” (EmphasisMine)

49 posted on 12/07/2022 11:50:57 AM PST by Tilted Irish Kilt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

Does “criminal negligence” count as an acceptable excuse for ignoring all the VAERS signals?


50 posted on 12/07/2022 12:38:34 PM PST by Gritty (The issue is never the issue. The issue is always the Revolution. - Saul Alinsky)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson