CDC Admits It Never Monitored VAERS for COVID Vaccine Safety Signals

The Defender ^ | 06/21/22 | Josh Guetzkow, Ph.D.

[glorgau]

It’s a case of being willfully, even criminally, blind. People inside the CDC knew better than to be looking for contra-indicators to the prevailing instructions.

[Flick Lives]

This is the sort of maneuvering underhanded bureaucrats do to create “plausible deniability”.

[heavy metal]

please pick up the courtesy phone...

[FamiliarFace]

This whole CoVid vaccine stuff has been a disaster.

[eyeamok]

NUREMBERG II, Some good rope

[Tunehead54]

Bump to PC & ALL!

[Pontiac]

A whole lotta people need to go to jail.

The entire response to COVID was a conspiracy to defraud the American People.

Billions of dollars were siphoned from the tax payers to the medical industry

COVID was the source of fear necessary to force people into compliance

[Political Junkie Too]

Since you found this interesting press release on VAERS, I'm interested in your opinion on something...

The CDC says: "... VAERS is designed to rapidly detect unusual or unexpected patterns of adverse events, also referred to as “safety signals.” If a possible safety signal is found in VAERS, further analysis is performed with other safety systems..."

If, by the CDC's own admission, VAERS is set up as a first alert system that "signals" the need for follow-up analysis on other "complementary systems," does it bother you that the CDC has refused to use their own primary system "intended to monitoring safety after vaccines are licensed or authorized for use?"

Does it bother you that it took at FOIA request to find this out?

-PJ

[Sioux-san]

A few things to keep in mind about VAERS. The Vaccine Manufacturers were threatening to stop production in AMerica due to all the lawsuits. They made a deal with the Reagan Administration and Congress to be exempt from these lawsuits in perpetuity, and a special ‘Fund’ of taxpayer dollars would be set up for adjudicating complaints and provide compensation if warranted, which is rare for this tribunal. Reagan allegedly asked why they couldn’t make a “Safe Vaccine” and was told: Not Possible.

A condition of this liability exemption was for a reporting system to be set up for Vaccine Adverse Events. ANyone is permitted to make a VAERS report online and by mail. The form clearly states the penalties you would suffer for making a false report.

I analyze the VAERS data every week for the entire US and for Michigan where I live. You can get Event detail with specifics (husband had vxx today, went to bed and never woke up) or quite detailed on miscarriages, young people repeatedly receiving boosters even though sick enough to be hospitalized after the first one. The Events provide age group, sex, state/territory, Vxx Mfgr, type of event by seriousness, date reported, date received by CDC, date of vaccination, lot #, dose, and specifics on where you got the vxx. Also you can describe in detail what happened and that is what will show up on the CDC VAERS report.

STudies have been done that show what is reported to VAERS is a fraction of what is actually going on, and that is why the CDC bloviates about the “unreliability” of this system they set up as a PROTECTION RACKET under “plausible deniability”

Very hard to get outraged when you don’t know the truth, and your trusted doctor is sworn to secrecy or lose his/her license, and HOspitals lose their Covid bonus. Citizens of Tennessee, Kentucky, and Michigan, don’t you wonder why your states are in the top 5 for Covid Vx deaths.

There’s still no approved test for Covid, just 500+ eua’s, The Govt. is still counting every “positive” as a New Case. Plenty of people did and still are dying from the lethal Covid Treatment Protocol: Ventilators, deadly anti-viral drugs, and now the Jabs. Miscarriages and dead babies, but the doctors still want you to get the Jab if you’re pregnant. Wow. The toll of the Fearmongering is a whole other matter.

[Sioux-san]

I forgot to mention that almost 715,000 Adverse Events have been reported to VAERS for Covid inoculates. Almost 10,000 deaths, 12,000 life threatening, 13,000+ with permanent disability, and nearly 52,000 hospitalized in the last 15 months for the 50 States+DC. From the beginning of the reporting (Dec2020) through April 2021, VAERS had almost 3,000 deaths reported. No one noticed that?

[combat_boots]

Worse.

No one in power cares

[Sioux-san]

Those in charge are quite pleased with how easy this was to accomplish. Hopefully FJB will not command such cooperation in the future.

[Political Junkie Too]

What you posted is interesting, but the point is that the CDC's own help page on VAERS brags about its front-line signaling of concerns requiring deeper analysis, and yet doesn't use it in actual practice.

Either the CDC is lying about its effectiveness as a go-to-first tool, or the CDC knows that VAERS has data quality issues and is using the existence of VAERS to give the medical community and the public the illusion that the CDC is monitoring for "signals" of deeper issues with the drugs that they approved just to appease the public.

I'd like to know which one it is, because it seems like what it is not is the signaling tool that the CDC said it uses to proactively look for problems. If the medical community comes to believe that VAERS is a smokescreen for the CDC, then they will stop putting in the effort to enter what they see on the ground in the hospitals and clinics, which would be a de facto vote of no-confidence in the CDC.

-PJ

[entropy12]

715k adverse effects out of 270 million jabbed?
That computes 99.75% not reporting adverse effects.

[teeman8r]

for a disease that has a less than 1% mortality rate...

[Seeing More Clearly Now]

If the plan was to destroy the social contract and trust from within, they did a great job. Who, but an automaton, still trusts any of the agencies of the government after this fiasco fueled by the production of mass fear.

[Pelham]

“Does it bother you that it took at FOIA request to find this out?”

Have you seen any proof that that is true?

[gitmo]

The Center for Deception and Control

[Political Junkie Too]

Have you seen any proof that that is true?

I've seen this article. Are you accusing the Children's Health Defense of lying about the CDC? Are you accusing the CDC of lying to the Children's Health Defense organization?

The CDC says:

Program staff within the Immunization and Safety Office inform me that no PRRs were conducted by CDC.

Furthermore, there are many medical publications (including this one from the FDA: Data Mining at FDA) that discuss using the Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR) method to analyze the FDA's FAERS (FDA Adverse Event Reporting System).

It's clear that the FDA has known for a long time about the PRR method of analyzing their FAERS system. This means that the CDC was also familiar with how to use the same analysis method on their VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System). The CDC admitted in their FOIA response that they have not done PRR analysis on their VAERS system, so yes I have seen proof -- the CDC itself admitted it in the letter I attached above.

Do you find it curious that the FDA does PRR analysis on their FAERS system, but the CDC won't do PRR analysis on their VAERS system?

Do you think they don't want to know the answers, so they're not willing to do the same analysis on the VAERS system that is done on the FAERS system?

I've given you the proof that you asked for. Now do you wish to answer the questions, or are you just going to deflect again?

-PJ