Posted on 08/05/2022 8:56:20 AM PDT by Callahan
He was the “king of revenge porn” — until his shocked and fed-up victims took him down.
The “king” in question is Hunter Moore, the founder of the now-defunct revenge porn website IsAnyoneUp.com and whose horrific enterprise is examined — along with his victims’ desperate fight for justice — in a new three-part Netflix documentary, “The Most Hated Man on the Internet.”
Moore, 36, created the site in 2010 and it allowed people allegedly hurt by relationships to post anonymous NSFW sexual content without the consent of their partners.
“Me and my friends would post [photos of] a bunch of girls, and I was like, ‘Yo, I can make money of f–kin’ people over,'” he says in archival footage featured in the trailer.
One interviewee in the series noted she received over 200 notifications that her photo was posted and another recalled persistently asking Moore to delete images of her.
“The response that I got [from him was]: ‘LOL,'” the subject says.
Charlotte Laws and her daughter Kayla — the latter falling victim to the site in 2012 when she was 24 — were interviewed in the doc about their scary experiences with Moore...
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
i will send nudes to anyone who asks
it comes with complimentary eye bleach
no takers so far
LOL!
Bad guy finds a gun in the nightstand.
Shoots the husband dead.
Cops arrest bad guy.
Shall we tell the crying widow "well, no personal responsibility is also a leftist trait"?
Make that “Bad guy finds a gun in the glove compartment of the car parked on the street.”
sorry i don’t see owning a handgun for protection and having naked selfies as the same thing.
But as i said before, go forth and be nude on camera. It does not affect me. But don’t complain when someone steals your pics and uses them for evil.
Someone should have killed it with a hammer.
It's a private property thing. And, as you say, a responsibility thing.
Any woman (or guy) taking selfies immediately owns those pictures. Those snaps are their private property.
Anyone buying a handgun owns that handgun. It is his/her private property.
If that selfie is stored on an email server or the cloud, it is STILL private property. Agreed, great care should always be taken to protect private property when outside of one's castle, but private property rights aren't nullified at one's property line.
Neither is personal responsibility limited to one's property line. The same holds true for a handgun in a glove compartment when the car is beyond your property line. Indeed, one of the key rules of handling a firearm is to be in control of it at all times.
Thus, our major premise is, storing selfies on a server is equal to keeping a handgun in a glove compartment when the car is on the street etc. It is still private property and theft is still the fault of the bad guy, but that property is not fully controlled since it's one step removed from your castle. Accordingly, things could go awry.
You chose to hold these women culpable for their selfies getting hacked.
Therefore, syllogistically, one holding your view on these women, would have to tell the widow that by failing to secure her handgun she's culpable in her husband's death.
what about the GGW girls- nothing got hacked, they willingly posed for those photos and then got upset when they were published.
It’s not the same. we don’t agree. I’m not crying for anybody.
The wreckless GGW are not the same as the women who were hacked.
If you still put wreckless GGW, and hacked and largely responsible women in the same boat, have a nice day.
well i guess i find it irresponsible to have naked pics of yourself on your phone or computer in this day and age.
what adult out there does not know about hacking?
If you are going to do it- then be ready for people to see them.
Why do you have a problem with my opinion?
what adult out there does not know about hacking robbery?
If you are going to do it own a gun- then be ready for people to see them steal it and don't whine if a loved one is harmed by it.
Why do youCan you see why anyone would have a problem with my your opinion?
we disagree- have a nice life out there.
You too, FRiend.
I stand by my assertion
Most attractive women have allowed their partner to photograph them nude or in lingerie including here back when
Considering average age here is mid 60s lol
You’re an exception not the rule
Every man I know personally with a hot wife has
Often the wife even has a pro take a portfolio of what I think is referred to as boudoir pics
This has become very common with phones and the incredible cameras some have
I stand by my assertion
Most attractive women have allowed their partner to photograph them nude or in lingerie including here back when
Considering average age here is mid 60s lol
You’re an exception not the rule
Every man I know personally with a hot wife has
Often the wife even has a pro take a portfolio of what I think is referred to as boudoir pics
This has become very common with phones and the incredible cameras some have
My experience is it’s extremely common
Remember we are an old person pre cell phone or social media forum so perspective here is skewed to that
Yes the woman should own the access
I don’t have any truck with folks seeing bikini pics but nudity pics should be controlled by her
Porn pics well that’s even more dangerous
Obviously
Younger folks are pretty open on girl hot pics even on high school or wierd to say earlier
My 13 year old son got shower pics from eighth grade girls
Wonder where the girl learned that?
My wife was livid
The girls mom not so much
And I for now live on americas arguably richest white county
70 plus percent GOPe voters
It’s a different world
For disclosure I don’t mind erotic age appropriate pics
So there is that admittedly
Agreed
I’m just saying it’s very prevalent
I’m thinking
I never took a nudie pic of girls with old cameras
In 1977 I did take a pic of a girl from my area who became a playmate on a big stack of Colombian square groupers
In her little blue bikini
She kept them wonder if she still has them
I think the owner sent it to High Times
Man the silliness of youth lol
Same thing happened to the guy who set up the girlsdoporn.com website.
Most of the girls were college students who had never done porn before and he convinced them that the scenes would be put on DVD and sold to a small, discrete group of collectors in Australia and that they'd never wind up on the internet. This, of course, was a total lie. They went straight on-line. He plied the girls with booze to the point that most of them were completely intoxicated during the filming.
At the same time, he set up a forum website "pornwiki" or something like that where he'd doxx the girls' real names, social media profiles, family's social media profiles, friends, employers, etc. Other posters joined in and revealed the names of other porn actresses. At the time, you could search and find the real names and Facebook pages of almost every girl working in the industry. He was truly a despicable human being.
Several federal charges were levied against him and he was convicted in absentia. He's Australian and the last I read, was still on the lam.
Eventually, the porn empire Brazzers bought the wiki page, shut it down and destroyed the servers.
Agree with your post. I find it incredibly sad that a 13 year old is sending out shower photos to young boys. Your wife had every right to be livid. And the reaction of the girl’s mom is quite horrifying.
I remember playing spin the bottle & that was risque! I applaud parents who want to nurture their children’s innocence. It makes for a much healthier childhood & society.
I am not a prude by any means, but some women don’t care how they present themselves in public. For some, the coarser the better.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.