[ProtectOurFreedom]

As long as we are discussing the Maricopa County vote tabulations here and here, I thought it would sensible to discuss IMPOSSIBLY BIG NUMBERS in the context of Dem voting crimes.

[Scrambler Bob]

(G+1)

[Larry Lucido]

Talking about the federal budget?

[I want the USA back]

Good. I couldn’t sleep last night worrying about how we’re going to represent the number if dollars needed to buy a loaf of bread after 4 years of biden.

[PatriotarchyQ]

Isn’t this the number of votes Trump claims he was robbed of in 2020?

[texas booster]

Donald E Knuth.

There are a lot of very smart people in this ole world, but Dr Knuth stands above them.

There may be some that are called "smarter" but in terms of applied math and science, he is way, way up there.

Yes, the same Dr Knuth that wrote the massive Art of Computer Programming way back in 1973.

[GaltAdonis]

"Oh Deep Thought - Give us the ultimate answer to life the universe and Everything!"

> 42 <

[Carl Vehse]

Compared to Rayo's Number, Graham's number can be counted on your fingers.

For details see Prof. Tony Padilla's explanation in The Daddy of Big Numbers (Rayo's Number) on YouTube.

[Fungi]

So what’s the point? Not enough material in the universe to write the number. How is it relevant to anything if it can’t be used? Get a life.

[Reily]

George Cantor territory!

[Drew68]

Tree (3) is larger than Graham’s Number.

[freefdny]

That’s become known as Biden’s number which is any number of votes a democrat needs to steal an election. It’s much higher than any of the other numbers in the article.

[Falconspeed]

“If all the material in the universe...” Yeah, well. News flash: numbers are imaginary. No number needs to be written on a physical paper with physical ink. Aristotle knew this 340 BC. The largest number is reasonably theorized and fuzzily imagined.