Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tonight in History: The Legend of Dracula Is Born -- How Vlad Dracul Became the Terror of the Ottoman Turks
PJ Media ^ | 06/17/2023 | Raymond Ibrahim

Posted on 06/17/2023 7:07:48 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

Today — or rather, tonight — in history, Vlad the Impaler launched a midnight raid against Muslim invaders that would cause his name to live on forever as Dracula, the terror of the night.

The year was 1462. Ottoman sultan Muhammad II (“Mehmet”) had demanded tribute, by way of gold and Romanian boys, to serve as his slave soldiers (janissaries). Vlad III Dracula — better known as Vlad Țepeș, or the “Impaler” — the ruler of Wallachia (in modern-day Romania) responded by sending the Muslim emissaries back to Muhammad with their turbans nailed onto their heads.

So it would be war. Muhammad mobilized one of the largest Ottoman armies in history, according to some estimates — between 150,000 and 300,000 — and invaded Wallachia, terrorizing all and sundry and engaging in unspeakable atrocities, especially against women and children. With only some 30,000 men — many of them peasants whose “armor” consisted of sheep’s wool, their weapons axes, scythes, and hammers — Vlad was forced to resort to guerilla tactics. Though he launched several successful sorties against the Islamic invaders, these barely made a dent in the Ottoman force, which consisted of “Allahu Akbar”-hollering jihadists “as numerous as the stars in the sky,” to quote an early source.

Knowing that he could never defeat the invaders, Vlad decided to do the next best thing: decapitate the head of this vast Islamic snake ravaging his country. In an effort to demoralize and disband the Turks, Vlad decided to assassinate the sultan.

Thus, on the pitch black night of June 16-17, 1462, somewhere near the foothills of the Carpathian mountains, where Muhammad and his vast Turkish host were encamped and asleep, Vlad, with anywhere between two thousand and seven thousand horsemen, violently blitzed into the lion’s den in search of the sultan’s head.

(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...


TOPICS: History; Religion; Society
KEYWORDS: donatedonaldtrump; donatefreerepublic; donatetrump; dracula; islam; legend; turks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: joma89

Truer words have never been spoken ... or posted.


21 posted on 06/18/2023 2:57:22 PM PDT by Spacetrucker (George Washington didn't use his freedom of speech to defeat the British - HE SHOT THEM .. WITH GUNS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: GunRunner

Couldn’t stand that movie, but I DO like that plot twist. If it had been done with skill and class, perhaps.


22 posted on 06/18/2023 2:58:43 PM PDT by Spacetrucker (George Washington didn't use his freedom of speech to defeat the British - HE SHOT THEM .. WITH GUNS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mass55th
The book isn't connected to the movie. According to Wikipedia, the movie "is an adaptation of 'The Captain's Log', a chapter from the 1897 Bram Stoker novel Dracula."

That chapter is by far the creepiest part of the book.

The Captain is writing his log while his men are disappearing one by one, and the crew are seeing strange things at night, surrounded by a fog that seems to follow them no matter where they go.

Will check it out.

23 posted on 06/18/2023 10:52:49 PM PDT by GunRunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Salamander
Have you seen the 70s PBS version with Louis Jourdan as the count?

YES! It's great, the whole thing is free on YouTube. It's very close to the book; probably the closest cinematic adaptation.

My only issue is they omit Quincey Morris entirely, just like almost all film adaptations. Or more accurately, they combine Quincey and Arthur into one character, although he's mostly Arthur.

Quincey was always my favorite character; an Indiana Jones type from Texas who carried a Bowie knife. Coppola's version was the only one to show Quincey, but they stole the long lost love story between Mina and Dracula (where Mina is the reincarnation of Dracula's dead wife) from Hammer's 1959 Mummy movie.

It was unnecessary since Mina from the novel was repulsed by Dracula and would never have given into his charms.

24 posted on 06/19/2023 10:18:08 AM PDT by GunRunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: GunRunner

Great to find someone who appreciates it as much as I do.
Saw it first run on PBS as a young teen and was hooked for life.

Much as I love Keanu Reeves and Gary Oldman I was not crazy about that version.

Frank Langella was good and really ramped up the erotic undertones of the book.

Interview was good despite Tom Cruise chewing the scenery.
Book was better but Pitt was perfect as the conflicted naïf.

George Hamilton was hysterical as the count.

And there’s always Christopher Lee.

/humming Blue Oyster Cult’s Nosferatu in my head now. ;)


25 posted on 06/19/2023 9:55:06 PM PDT by Salamander (Please visit my profile page help save my beloved dog's life. https://www.givesendgo.com/G2FUF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

An old friend from Romania told me that, in Romania, Vlad/Dracula is considered to be a folk hero.


26 posted on 07/03/2023 11:44:13 PM PDT by The Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson