Posted on 06/27/2002 9:45:59 PM PDT by petuniasevan
Discover the cosmos! Each day a different image or photograph of our fascinating universe is featured, along with a brief explanation written by a professional astronomer.
Explanation: Can the Hubble Space Telescope take a picture that shows the Apollo lunar modules on the Moon? With its 2.4 meter diameter mirror, the smallest object that the Hubble can resolve at the Moon's distance of around 400,000 kilometers is about 80 meters across. So, from low Earth orbit even Hubble's sharp vision can not image the Apollo lunar module descent stages, at most a few meters across, left behind at the lunar landing sites. A space telescope over ten times the size of Hubble could ... or a much smaller telescope in close lunar orbit. In fact, this picture does just resolve Apollo 17's Lunar Module, Challenger, and its shadow on the floor of the Taurus-Littrow valley in the Moon's Mare Serenitatis. It was taken in 1972 from the Apollo 17 Command Module, America, orbiting about 100 kilometers above the Moon's surface and covers an area about 1.1 kilometers wide. Using a web site created by Dan Durda of Southwest Research Institute, armchair astronauts can explore orbital views of this and the 5 other Apollo lunar landing sites.
Get on the APOD PING list!
Sarcasm aside, I'm still mourning the loss of a real hero. Dr. Karl Klager. He made the fuel for the 3,4,&5 stages. He did all our rocket fuels. This country gained much when he came and lost much with his passing.
Us rocket guys say, "propellant", not "fuel". Fuel is usually one-half of propellant.
Apollo used no solid fuels except on the escape rocket. It was powered by liquid oxygen, kerosene (RP-1), and liquid hydrogen. I do not believe Dr. Klager had any part in any of those substances.
--Boris
The obituary I have from the Sacramento Bee says:
"After emigrating to the United States, the Austrian-born chemist became a world-renowned pioneer in rocket propellants, inventing key ingredients to fuel the Polaris, Minuteman, Titan, Gemini, and Apollo engines and achieving most of those breakthroughs at Aerojet in Rancho Cordova.
Along the way he descovered and developed ingredients for solid and liquid rocket fuel that became industry standards, according to a NASA history of rocketry.
Dr. Klager received the U.S. Navy Distinguished Public Services Award in 1958 for his work on the Polaris missile."
There are quotes in the obituary from Jerry Lewelling. Check the link I provided earlier and do some research. His wife, Elizabeth, has moved to the Tacoma area to be with there son. He was a dentist in the Army now retired.
The obit is simply wrong, and/or the obit writer is sorely confused. Polaris and Minuteman used solids. All of the others used conventional liquid fuels. No 'fuels' had to be 'invented' to run any of NASA's spacecraft. Kerosene, liquid oxygen, liquid hydrogen, various nitric acids, such as nitrogen tetroxide, Red Fuming Nitric Acid, Inhibited Red Fuming Nitric Acid. Various versions of hydrazine such as UDMH, MMH, etc. Maybe this guy invented "Aerozine 50"--a mix of UDMH and hydrazine (as I recall). It is no longer in use.
--Boris
At Aerojet, he used a cast, case bonded polyether-polyester-polyurethane composit with 15 percent aluminum and anunonium (whatever the heck that is) perchlorate.
I know it is unusual for someone to work in both liquid and solid but I assure you he did and if you just researched it you would find that.
J D Hunley
NASA Dryden Flight Research Center
Edwards, California
No, he invented UDMH.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.