Skip to comments.
Winning, no sweat (This year's mid-term elections)
The National Post ^
| August 28, 2010
| Charles Lewis
Posted on 08/28/2010 1:17:37 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
It has the making of a stunning political turnaround that could change the course of the United States for the next 10 years.
The 2010 U.S. mid-term elections -- in which every seat of the House of Representatives, a third of the Senate and 36 governorships are up for grabs -- could see the start of the Republican Party's march back to power and propel a Republican into the White House, likely a relative unknown, two years later.
The possible about-turn comes as economic growth falters and unemployment rises, and amid growing frustration over unchecked illegal immigration.
"The 2010 elections are going to be a tsunami," said Richard Land, president of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission, the policy arm of the Southern Baptist Convention, and a leading conservative thinker.
"I've been travelling all over the country and I've never seen anything like it. And the economy has caused it to reach critical mass -- but it's deeper than that."
Republicans obviously stand to gain from the mess, but not because they are in any way popular. Polls taken by the Pew Forum on the People & the Press show on many questions they are equally as unpopular or less popular than Democrats. What is more, a large number of people surveyed could not actually identify a GOP agenda.
"This election Republicans could go on vacation," says Michael Tanner, a senior fellow at the Washington-based Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank. "This is an election that is not about the Republicans, it's a referendum on [President Barack] Obama's performance. To the degree Republicans are out there, they can only screw it up."
The potential turnaround is all the more remarkable because it has only been four years since Democrats seized control of Congress...
(Excerpt) Read more at nationalpost.com ...
TOPICS: Issues; Parties; U.S. Congress; U.S. Senate
KEYWORDS: 2010; 2010midterms; backlash; bho44; democrats; economy; glennbeck; gopcomeback; immigration; obama; palin; recession; teaparty
"...could see the start of the Republican Party's march back to power and propel a Republican into the White House, likely a relative unknown, two years later."
Oh, I beg to differ, she's well-known, all right.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
What is more, a large number of people surveyed could not actually identify a GOP agenda. What was the Democrat agenda in 2006 and 2008?
2
posted on
08/28/2010 1:27:55 AM PDT
by
Cowboy Bob
(Liberalism and Patriotism cannot coexist.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
It’s not a done deal. I have every faith in the GOP being able to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.
3
posted on
08/28/2010 1:31:22 AM PDT
by
Kozak
(USA 7/4/1776 to 1/20/2009 Reqiescat in Pace)
To: Cowboy Bob
What was the Democrat agenda in 2006 and 2008? In 2008, it was, "We aren't Bush." Not much else.
In 2006 (and somewhat in 2008) it was, "Conservatives want to take away everyone's money and give it to the rich, destroy Social Security, and be mean to everyone who's not white. Vote Democrat and we'll make those mean rich people give you their money."
4
posted on
08/28/2010 2:25:27 AM PDT
by
Quiller
(When you're fighting to survive, there is no "try" -- there is only do, or do not.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
The potential turnaround is all the more remarkable because it has only been four years since Democrats seized control of Congress... Complete B.$. Bush 41 never had a congress with him. Democrat party took over congress in in 95, after Clinton proved how dangerous for the U.S. it is for POTUS & congress to be from same party.
0 and gang have proved THAT lesson to the Xth power.
5
posted on
08/28/2010 2:30:34 AM PDT
by
Quiller
(When you're fighting to survive, there is no "try" -- there is only do, or do not.)
To: Cowboy Bob
What was the Democrat agenda in 2006 and 2008?
1. Destroy from within
2. Spend, spend, spend
3. Act as much like incompetent boobs as possible
To: 2ndDivisionVet
"...it's a referendum on [President Barack] Obama's performance. To the degree Republicans are out there, they can only screw it up." There's no chance they could do that, is there?
To: Quiller; 2ndDivisionVet
Originally posted by
Quiller:
"Democrat party took over congress in in 95, after Clinton proved how dangerous for the U.S. it is for POTUS & congress to be from same party."
While I think you meant "Republican party took over congress in 95", the history of the Federal government shows that the States and voters of the nation gave one party the control of the Presidency and both Branches of Congress, a 'trifecta' so to speak, over 60% of the time. Obama's first two years with both the House and Senate control only added to this trifecta...
The problem with the 'trifecta' is that the States no longer have their interests represented in the US Senate, so that the Senate just became a more exclusive, smaller version of the US House of Representatives - with the filibuster the only way for the minority to influence legislation. Bush (43) had a Republican Congress for about five out of his eight years - but the filibuster ability of the Democrats in the US Senate was able to frustrate many of his legislative proposals. Only the 41 Republican votes in the currently sitting US Senate will be able to prevent any lame-duck legislation if the Republicans win big in the House and Senate come November.
Party Control of Presidency, House and Senate
1789 to 2009
Congress |
Years_Term |
President |
Presidential Party |
House Majority Party |
Senate Majority Party |
The Big Tri-Fecta |
1st |
1789-1791 |
Washington |
No Party |
Administration |
Administration |
* |
2nd |
1791-1793 |
Washington |
No Party |
Administration |
Administration |
* |
3rd |
1793-1795 |
Washington |
No Party |
Opposition |
Administration |
|
4th |
1795-1797 |
Washington |
No Party |
Opposition |
Administration |
|
5th |
1797-1799 |
Adams(2) |
Federalist |
Dem-Reps |
Federalist |
|
6th |
1799-1801 |
Adams(2) |
Federalist |
Federalist |
Federalist |
* |
7th |
1801-1803 |
Jefferson |
Dem-Reps |
Dem-Reps |
Dem-Reps |
* |
8th |
1803-1805 |
Jefferson |
Dem-Reps |
Dem-Reps |
Dem-Reps |
* |
9th |
1805-1807 |
Jefferson |
Dem-Reps |
Dem-Reps |
Dem-Reps |
* |
10th |
1807-1809 |
Jefferson |
Dem-Reps |
Dem-Reps |
Dem-Reps |
* |
11th |
1809-1811 |
Madison |
Dem-Reps |
Dem-Reps |
Dem-Reps |
* |
12th |
1811-1813 |
Madison |
Dem-Reps |
Dem-Reps |
Dem-Reps |
* |
13th |
1814-1815 |
Madison |
Dem-Reps |
Dem-Reps |
Dem-Reps |
* |
14th |
1815-1817 |
Madison |
Dem-Reps |
Dem-Reps |
Dem-Reps |
* |
15th |
1817-1819 |
Monroe |
Dem-Reps |
Dem-Reps |
Dem-Reps |
* |
16th |
1819-1821 |
Monroe |
Dem-Reps |
Dem-Reps |
Dem-Reps |
* |
17th |
1821-1823 |
Monroe |
Dem-Reps |
Dem-Reps |
Dem-Reps |
* |
18th |
1823-1825 |
Monroe |
Dem-Reps |
Dem-Reps |
Dem-Reps |
* |
19th |
1825-1827 |
Adams(6) |
Dem-Reps |
Dem-Reps |
Dem-Reps |
* |
20th |
1827-1829 |
Adams(6) |
Dem-Reps |
Dem-Reps |
Dem-Reps |
* |
21st |
1829-1831 |
Jackson |
Democrat |
Democrat |
Democrat |
* |
22nd |
1831-1833 |
Jackson |
Democrat |
Democrat |
Democrat |
* |
23rd |
1834-1835 |
Jackson |
Democrat |
Democrat |
Whig |
|
24th |
1835-1837 |
Jackson |
Democrat |
Democrat |
Democrat |
* |
25th |
1837-1839 |
Van-Buren |
Democrat |
Democrat |
Democrat |
* |
26th |
1839-1841 |
Van-Buren |
Democrat |
Whig |
Democrat |
|
27th |
1841-1843 |
Harrison(9)/Tyler |
Whig |
Whig |
Whig |
* |
28th |
1843-1845 |
Tyler |
Whig |
Democrat |
Whig |
|
29th |
1845-1847 |
Polk |
Democrat |
Democrat |
Democrat |
* |
30th |
1847-1849 |
Polk |
Democrat |
Whig |
Democrat |
|
31st |
1849-1851 |
Taylor/Filmore |
Whig |
Democrat |
Democrat |
|
32nd |
1851-1853 |
Filmore |
Whig |
Democrat |
Democrat |
|
33rd |
1853-1855 |
Pierce |
Democrat |
Democrat |
Democrat |
* |
34th |
1855-1857 |
Pierce |
Democrat |
Republican |
Democrat |
|
35th |
1857-1859 |
Buchanan |
Democrat |
Democrat |
Democrat |
* |
36th |
1859-1861 |
Buchanan |
Democrat |
Republican |
Democrat |
|
37th |
1861-1863 |
Lincoln |
Republican |
Republican |
Republican |
* |
38th |
1863-1865 |
Lincoln |
Republican |
Republican |
Republican |
* |
39th |
1865-1867 |
Lincoln/Johnson(17) |
Republican* |
Republican |
Republican |
* |
40th |
1867-1869 |
Johnson(17) |
Republican* |
Republican |
Republican |
* |
41st |
1869-1871 |
Grant |
Republican |
Republican |
Republican |
* |
42nd |
1871-1873 |
Grant |
Republican |
Republican |
Republican |
* |
43rd |
1873-1875 |
Grant |
Republican |
Republican |
Republican |
* |
44th |
1875-1877 |
Grant |
Republican |
Democrat |
Republican |
|
45th |
1877-1879 |
Hayes |
Republican |
Democrat |
Republican |
|
46th |
1879-1881 |
Hayes |
Republican |
Democrat |
Republican |
|
47th |
1881-1883 |
Garfield/Arthur |
Republican |
Republican |
Republican |
* |
48th |
1883-1885 |
Arthur |
Republican |
Democrat |
Republican |
|
49th |
1885-1887 |
Cleveland(22) |
Democrat |
Democrat |
Republican |
|
50th |
1887-1889 |
Cleveland(22) |
Democrat |
Democrat |
Republican |
|
51st |
1889-1891 |
Harrison(23) |
Republican |
Republican |
Republican |
* |
52nd |
1891-1893 |
Harrison(23) |
Republican |
Democrat |
Republican |
|
53rd |
1893-1895 |
Cleveland(24) |
Democrat |
Democrat |
Republican |
|
54th |
1895-1897 |
Cleveland(24) |
Democrat |
Republican |
Republican |
|
55th |
1897-1899 |
McKinley |
Republican |
Republican |
Republican |
* |
56th |
1899-1901 |
McKinley |
Republican |
Republican |
Republican |
* |
57th |
1901-1903 |
McKinley/Roosevelt(26) |
Republican |
Republican |
Republican |
* |
58th |
1903-1905 |
Roosevelt(26) |
Republican |
Republican |
Republican |
* |
59th |
1905-1907 |
Roosevelt(26) |
Republican |
Republican |
Republican |
* |
60th |
1907-1909 |
Roosevelt(26) |
Republican |
Republican |
Republican |
* |
61st |
1909-1911 |
Taft |
Republican |
Republican |
Republican |
* |
62nd |
1911-1913 |
Taft |
Republican |
Democrat |
Republican |
|
63rd |
1913-1915 |
Wilson |
Democrat |
Democrat |
Republican |
|
64th |
1915-1917 |
Wilson |
Democrat |
Democrat |
Democrat |
* |
65th |
1917-1919 |
Wilson |
Democrat |
Republican |
Democrat |
|
66th |
1919-1921 |
Wilson |
Democrat |
Republican |
Republican |
|
67th |
1921-1923 |
Harding/Coolidge |
Republican |
Republican |
Republican |
* |
68th |
1923-1925 |
Coolidge |
Republican |
Republican |
Republican |
* |
69th |
1925-1927 |
Coolidge |
Republican |
Republican |
Republican |
* |
70th |
1927-1929 |
Coolidge |
Republican |
Republican |
Republican |
* |
71st |
1929-1931 |
Hoover |
Republican |
Republican |
Republican |
* |
72nd |
1931-1933 |
Hoover |
Republican |
Republican |
Republican |
* |
73rd |
1933-1935 |
Roosevelt(32) |
Democrat |
Democrat |
Democrat |
* |
74th |
1935-1937 |
Roosevelt(32) |
Democrat |
Democrat |
Democrat |
* |
75th |
1937-1939 |
Roosevelt(32) |
Democrat |
Democrat |
Democrat |
* |
76th |
1939-1941 |
Roosevelt(32) |
Democrat |
Democrat |
Democrat |
* |
77th |
1941-1943 |
Roosevelt(32) |
Democrat |
Democrat |
Democrat |
* |
78th |
1943-1945 |
Roosevelt(32) |
Democrat |
Democrat |
Democrat |
* |
79th |
1945-1947 |
Roosevelt(32)/Truman |
Democrat |
Democrat |
Democrat |
* |
80th |
1947-1949 |
Truman |
Democrat |
Republican |
Democrat |
|
81st |
1949-1951 |
Truman |
Democrat |
Democrat |
Democrat |
* |
82nd |
1951-1953 |
Truman |
Democrat |
Democrat |
Democrat |
* |
83rd |
1953-1955 |
Eisenhower |
Republican |
Republican |
Republican |
* |
84th |
1955-1957 |
Eisenhower |
Republican |
Democrat |
Democrat |
|
85th |
1957-1959 |
Eisenhower |
Republican |
Democrat |
Democrat |
|
86th |
1959-1961 |
Eisenhower |
Republican |
Democrat |
Democrat |
|
87th |
1961-1963 |
Kennedy |
Democrat |
Democrat |
Democrat |
* |
88th |
1963-1965 |
Kennedy/Johnson(36) |
Democrat |
Democrat |
Democrat |
* |
89th |
1965-1967 |
Johnson(36) |
Democrat |
Democrat |
Democrat |
* |
90th |
1967-1969 |
Johnson(36) |
Democrat |
Democrat |
Democrat |
* |
91st |
1969-1971 |
Nixon |
Republican |
Democrat |
Democrat |
|
92nd |
1971-1973 |
Nixon |
Republican |
Democrat |
Democrat |
|
93rd |
1973-1975 |
Nixon/Ford |
Republican |
Democrat |
Democrat |
|
94th |
1975-1977 |
Ford |
Republican |
Democrat |
Democrat |
|
95th |
1977-1979 |
Carter |
Democrat |
Democrat |
Democrat |
* |
96th |
1979-1981 |
Carter |
Democrat |
Democrat |
Democrat |
* |
97th |
1981-1983 |
Reagan |
Republican |
Democrat |
Republican |
|
98th |
1983-1985 |
Reagan |
Republican |
Democrat |
Republican |
|
99th |
1985-1987 |
Reagan |
Republican |
Democrat |
Republican |
|
100th |
1987-1989 |
Reagan |
Republican |
Democrat |
Democrat |
|
101st |
1989-1991 |
Bush(41) |
Republican |
Democrat |
Democrat |
|
102nd |
1991-1993 |
Bush(41) |
Republican |
Democrat |
Democrat |
|
103rd |
1993-1995 |
Clinton |
Democrat |
Democrat |
Democrat |
* |
104th |
1995-1997 |
Clinton |
Democrat |
Republican |
Republican |
|
105th |
1997-1999 |
Clinton |
Democrat |
Republican |
Republican |
|
106th |
1999-2001 |
Clinton |
Democrat |
Republican |
Republican |
|
107th |
2001-2003 |
Bush(43) |
Republican |
Republican |
Rep/Dem |
*/no |
108th |
2003-2005 |
Bush(43) |
Republican |
Republican |
Republican |
* |
107th |
2005-2007 |
Bush(43) |
Republican |
Republican |
Republican |
* |
109th |
2007-2009 |
Bush(43) |
Republican |
Democrat |
Democrat |
|
dvwjr
8
posted on
08/28/2010 12:15:38 PM PDT
by
dvwjr
To: dvwjr
While I think you meant "Republican party took over congress in 95", Yup, absolutely right-- thanks for the catch.
Must be that slysdexia kicking in again.
9
posted on
08/28/2010 1:15:36 PM PDT
by
Quiller
(When you're fighting to survive, there is no "try" -- there is only do, or do not.)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson