Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Romney Attempts to Endorse GOP Nominee for AL Governor, Fails Miserably When Endorsement Turned Down
Weasel Zippers ^ | October 2, 2010 | Zip

Posted on 10/02/2010 9:30:54 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

TUSCALOOSA, Ala. — Alabama Republican governor candidate Robert Bentley has turned down an offered endorsement from former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, expected to be a candidate for the Republican nomination for president in 2012.

Romney on Thursday endorsed a list of 24 Alabama Republicans, including U.S. Sen. Richard Shelby, state treasurer Kay Ivey in her race for lieutenant governor and Birmingham lawyer Luther Strange, who is running for attorney general.

The Birmingham News reported that Bentley turned down the endorsement. A spokeswoman for Bentley, Rebekah Mason, said Friday that Bentley wanted to concentrate on the race for governor and did not want to give the impression that he was endorsing anyone in the 2012 presidential race. (BS, Romney’s a RINO and this guy wants nothing to do with it -ed.)


TOPICS: Alabama; Campaign News; Parties; State and Local
KEYWORDS: 2010; alabama; backstabberromney; backstabbers4romney; benedictromney; brutusromney; canttrustromney; dirtytrickromney; du4romney; obama4romney; rino; romney; romney4dnc; romney4obama; romney4tarp; romneybigidig; romneycare; romneydeathpanels; romneyfascism; romneymarriage
No Wagyu beef at the White House for this guy if Myth gets elected... LOL
1 posted on 10/02/2010 9:30:59 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I don’t think a Romney endorsement does anything for GOP candidates in red states. He should stick to blue state endorsements.


2 posted on 10/02/2010 9:34:20 PM PDT by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

LOL.

So this was actually true!


3 posted on 10/02/2010 9:35:31 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
A spokeswoman for Bentley, Rebekah Mason, said Friday that Bentley wanted to concentrate on the race for governor and did not want to give the impression that he was endorsing anyone in the 2012 presidential race.

Actually, this is a smart move on Bentley's part, particularly if the governor's race is close. He doesn't close the door to supporting Mitt as a possible VP nominee. As the leading candidate of the Dewey/Bush/New England Patrician wing of the party, it is not wise to p*ss on Mitt, but it is wise to keep him at arm's length.

4 posted on 10/02/2010 9:35:43 PM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman
to supporting Mitt as a possible VP nominee.

Who would have him on their ticket?
5 posted on 10/02/2010 9:39:15 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman
it is not wise to p*ss on Mitt

Yes, it is!!!

6 posted on 10/02/2010 9:39:31 PM PDT by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
The Birmingham News reported that Bentley turned down the endorsement. A spokeswoman for Bentley, Rebekah Mason, said Friday that Bentley wanted to concentrate on the race for governor and did not want to give the impression that he was endorsing anyone in the 2012 presidential race. (BS, Romney’s a RINO and this guy wants nothing to do with it -ed.)

Why do the Bentley people insist on insulting everyone with this lie? Bentley is a Huckabee supporter.

http://fwix.com/birmingham/article/bb15c2079c/huckabee_robocalls_for_bentley

7 posted on 10/02/2010 9:39:31 PM PDT by kbennkc (For those who have fought for it freedom has a flavor the protected will never know .F Trp 8th Cav)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Romney spent millions on 2008 and got how many votes? What does it take for a buffoon of this magnitude to get the message that he is yesterday's news? If he couldn't get to first base against Huckleberry, Mccain and Co., then why does he think he has a chance now?

Presidential ambition is nature's way of telling you that you have too much money.

8 posted on 10/02/2010 9:42:21 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name
"Who would have him on their ticket? "

Obama? LOL! They both have a lot in common (healthcare, socialism, etc...), and Obama could have a VP with good hair instead of plugs!

9 posted on 10/02/2010 9:43:44 PM PDT by Slump Tester (What if I'm pregnant Teddy? Errr-ahh -Calm down Mary Jo, we'll cross that bridge when we come to it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kbennkc
http://www.redstate.com/conservativeinabluestate/2010/07/30/dont-vote-for-rick-snyder-plant-fraud-rino-michigan-please/

Red State claims Bentley is a teachers union stooge?

10 posted on 10/02/2010 9:44:47 PM PDT by kbennkc (For those who have fought for it freedom has a flavor the protected will never know .F Trp 8th Cav)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I love it. Finally some Republicans are getting that Romney is a liberal.


11 posted on 10/02/2010 9:48:41 PM PDT by svcw (Just incase you ever wondered: As of May 2010, it costs ~ $0.0167 US Dollars to mint a penny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman
it is not wise to p*ss on Mitt,

It's not only wise, it's Lurker Recommended!

12 posted on 10/02/2010 9:49:34 PM PDT by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Willard has an MA Form 1099-HC problem.

No amount of Bain & Company nuancing will explain away his signature.


13 posted on 10/02/2010 9:53:03 PM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

in my very humble opinion, it is bad form to turn down this endorsement. it makes the guy seem like a prick. romney is a liberal republican, so what? for his part of the country he’s very conservative. either way, you can accept the endorsement without accepting ALL his views.


14 posted on 10/02/2010 10:03:43 PM PDT by GodfearingTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name
Reagan took Bush. I don't think it was out of any great love for George H.W. Bush, but out of a need to get the RINO wing of the party united behind the only genuinely conservative candidate in half a century or more.

We got eight years of genuinely conservative government, four years of mushy RINO government (during which we got one bad and one great SCOTUS nominee) and the collapse of the Soviet Empire. Not a bad trade-off.

Of course, if there is a way to put two conservatives on the ticket, all the better . . .

15 posted on 10/02/2010 10:08:38 PM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Slump Tester

I like the way you think. It’s a PERFECT match and will cover the span of all the lefties - from the radical to the not so radical.


16 posted on 10/02/2010 10:18:56 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

“If he couldn’t get to first base against Huckleberry, Mccain and Co., then why does he think he has a chance now?”

Of course you are right, but I’m sure he thinks it’s “his turn” now.

And if there is ONE thing the Republicans need to stop doing it is stop nominating people because it is their turn.

I actually think we had NO good candidates last time (full disclosure I was a Giuliani supporter and still can’t believe how bad he messed that up. Iowa should put up a statue of him, since no candidate will ever skip over that state again).

In hindsight, Romney might have been a good president to have now.

And hey, at least none of our guys hate America, so there’s that.

But Romney could not get through to the Evangelicals, and he won’t get through to them this time either.

He really should just hang it up.


17 posted on 10/02/2010 10:28:51 PM PDT by jocon307 (Loser Merjerksi broke my tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

The man knows his state and it’s the absolute perfect thing to do. They do not like Romney there. Romney needs to stay where he is wanted.


18 posted on 10/02/2010 10:50:16 PM PDT by Waryone (RINOs, Elites, and Socialists - on the endangered list, soon to become extinct.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

“Reagan took Bush. I don’t think it was out of any great love for George H.W. Bush, but out of a need to get the RINO wing of the party united behind the only genuinely conservative candidate in half a century or more.”

Very well said, as was your entire post. Been my philosophy for a long time now.

Folks, we just can’t let 2012 be a repeat of ‘08 which is dangerously close to resulting in the demise of this republic. We MUST get b. hussein obama out at any and all costs or you can kiss it goodbye. The example of Reagan’s reasoning is spot on. Our candidate must be a unifier - not divisive, and - electable! Also, that candidate (unlike McCain) has GOT to run a rock-solid, non-PC (even ruthless if necessary) campaign against arguably the worst enemy of this country to ever occupy the people’s White House.


19 posted on 10/02/2010 10:53:15 PM PDT by llandres (ex)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Waryone

You’re right,we don’t want him.


20 posted on 10/02/2010 11:58:11 PM PDT by silentreignofheroes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: kbennkc

I guess that explains why Romney endorsed him.


21 posted on 10/03/2010 1:15:34 AM PDT by Terry Mross (Never again will I hold my nose and vote for a rino.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: llandres; Vigilanteman

We usually get who the media and the party want us to have. Sometimes it is because, in their opinion, it is some person’s turn.

In 1976, they gave us Gerald Ford instead of Ronald Reagan. That in turn gave us Jimmy carter.

In 1992, they gave us George H.W. Bush which gave us Bill Clinton. However, if Bush had not been conned by George Mitchell into violating his campaign slogan, “Read my lips, no new taxes!” he would probably have beaten Clinton.

In 1996, we got Bob Dole. Everybody knew that was a throwaway.

In 2008, we got John McCain. Had it not been for Sarah Palin that would have been a rout for Obama.

Now, the media and the party want us to have Romney.

For way too long the accepted wisdom has been that numbers and majorities control the political power. That is true, of course, but that concept has left both parties chasing after an illusive and perhaps fictitious mushy middle of so-called moderates. The end result is often that you can’t tell one party from the other.

Another aspect that has come into play is that the Democrats have become so aggressively Leftist, the secret word there is aggressive as they have been Leftist for a long time, that having a small majority over them is not enough. They will bend and stretch the rules to get their way and they can always trust the media to make them seem to be doing the right thing. The result is the Republicans end up with a bunch of unreliable moderates and the majority means nothing.

Yet, the Party and the party’s political consultants still maintain a tight grip on the process. The Tea Party Movement is destroying that and the “establishment” doesn’t like it a bit. Sarah Palin calls the establishment career politicians and she is right. Politics is their business and they have made a handsome living off it for years. They won’t give it up easily.

However, now is our time to take the reins away from the establishment and return the government to the people. I am not against all politicians. If there are those who have strong and reliable conservative values we would be foolish not to consider their political experience but I would rather have dedicated conservative patriots with no experience than a sometimes conservative with experience. I am tired of compromising because we always lose our values in those compromises.

Like it or not establishment, here we come. Who cares if O’Donnell loses to a Communist Democrat? She defeated a Socialist Republican so we made that much progress. If we get behind her and the other conservative Republican women they may all win. That would be great and would send a resounding message to the world that America is coming back.


22 posted on 10/03/2010 1:36:15 AM PDT by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all that needs to be done needs to be done by the government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei; Syncro

That’s nothing, the Tea Party Express endorsed a vulnerable Democrat in the heart of deep red Idaho.
He rejected the endorsement, too, but Tea Party Express still includes him on their endorsement list, and he’ll probably win and get to cast another vote for Nanzi Pelosi for Speaker thanks to this endorsement.

Can anyone make sense of why Tea Party Express would do this?
It’s almost like they WANT the GOP to miss taking back the House by one seat...


23 posted on 10/03/2010 2:21:20 AM PDT by counterpunch (End the Government Monopoly!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mind-numbed Robot
In 2008, we got John McCain. Had it not been for Sarah Palin that would have been a rout for Obama.
Since when do we use Joe Biden's "votes created or saved" excuse?
And, it was a rout. McCain-Palin lost every single state that was in play.
 
24 posted on 10/03/2010 2:24:59 AM PDT by counterpunch (End the Government Monopoly!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: jocon307

Romney is the GOP’s Herpes and the DNC’s weapon.


25 posted on 10/03/2010 4:33:58 AM PDT by Diogenesis ('Freedom is the light of all sentient beings.' - Optimus Prime)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch
"And, it was a rout. McCain-Palin lost every single state that was in play.""

It was a rout because of Team Romney's Election2008 BACKSTABBING Party.


"Former Mitt Romney presidential campaign staffers…
have been involved in spreading anti-Palin spin to reporters, seeking to diminish her standing after the election.
'Sarah Palin is a lightweight, she won't be the first, not even the third, person people will think of when it comes to 2012,'
says one former Romney aide…
'The only serious candidate ready to challenge to lead the Republican Party is Mitt Romney.
"Some former Romney aides were behind the recent leaks to media, including CNN, that Governor Sarah Palin was a 'diva' and was going off message intentionally."


The Palmetto Scoop reported:
"The sources said nearly 80 percent of Romney’s former staff was absorbed by McCain and these individuals were responsible for what amounts to a premeditated, last-minute sabotage of Palin."
that Palin would be a serious contender for the Republican nomination in 2012 or 2016, which made her a threat to another presidential quest by Romney.

"Peeking Out From the McCain Wreckage: Mitt Romney"

"Someone's got to say it: IS MITT ROMNEY RESPONSIBLE FOR OBAMA'S VICTORY?"

"Vanity: Team Romney Sabotaged Palin and Continuing to Do So?"

"Romney Supporters Trashing Palin"

"Romney advisors sniping at Palin?"


Poor sport spoiler Romney doing what he does best:

Novak: "Fred Thompson drop-out rumors traced to Romney campaign"

Said Novak: "The rumors were traced in part to Mitt Romney's campaign,
trying to stir up strife between McCain and Thompson
."


"Despite outspending his rivals by huge margins throughout the primaries,
(Mitt Romney, Carpetbagger UT,CA,MA,NH,Mexico) lost Iowa, South Carolina, Florida and California.
The only primaries he won were in Michigan, where Dad was governor; LDS states;
and a few states on Super Tuesday in which his California-obsessed rivals
couldn't spare the cash to advertise.
Only John Connolly in 1968 had a worse cash-to-delegates ratio.
And John McCain rightly did not like Romney's tactics during the primaries.
(W)hen (Romney's early leads) started slipping away, he resorted to unfair,
distorted, scorched-earth negative ads, betting that his opponents couldn't
afford to spend enough for the truth to catch up to his charges."

[Romney: A Mistake for McCain, 7/23/2008, Dick Morris]

26 posted on 10/03/2010 4:42:44 AM PDT by Diogenesis ('Freedom is the light of all sentient beings.' - Optimus Prime)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

Sorry, but some rumors about Palin allegedly spread by ex-Romney staffers aren’t going to be the reason why McCain-Palin lost by 8.5 million votes — the exact same number that Reagan beat Carter by!

So if that’s not a rout, I don’t know what is!


27 posted on 10/03/2010 4:48:56 AM PDT by counterpunch (End the Government Monopoly!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

Oh wait, but there’s more!
Carter’s losing VP running mate went on to challenge Reagan 4 years later, and lost by 17 million votes.
Sound familiar? Let’s not be Mondale in 2012. Thanks.


28 posted on 10/03/2010 4:52:30 AM PDT by counterpunch (End the Government Monopoly!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch
You minimize the impact of Wallace/Parker/Frum/Romney
and their MSM connections.

Fact: The McCain/Palin ticket was up ++4 to 10 pts. in some polls, days prior to the election.
So rather than helping the GOP, Romney and
TeamROMNEY decided …… to attack Gov. Palin to throw Election2008.

"Frum was indeed a critic of Palin, calling her nomination a "huge mistake" during an October 13 (2008, weeks before the election) Early Show appearance."


David Frum: "Two of our most plausible candidates for president in 2012 are leading Mormons: Mitt Romney and Utah governor Jon Huntsman."


David Frum: "I have a lot of regard for Mitt Romney as a man and politician… I will support him without qualm."


Late in October, The American Spectator's The Prowler revealed:
"Former Mitt Romney presidential campaign staffers…
have been involved in spreading anti-Palin spin to reporters, seeking to diminish her standing after the election.
'Sarah Palin is a lightweight, she won't be the first, not even the third, person people will think of when it comes to 2012,'
says one former Romney aide…
'The only serious candidate ready to challenge to lead the Republican Party is Mitt Romney.
"Some former Romney aides were behind the recent leaks to media, including CNN, that Governor Sarah Palin was a 'diva' and was going off message intentionally."


The Palmetto Scoop reported: "One of the first stories to hit the national airwaves was
the claim of a major internal strife between close McCain aides and the folks handling his running mate Sarah Palin."
"I’m told by very good sources that this was indeed the case and that a rift had developed, but it was between Palin’s people and the staffers brought on from the failed presidential campaign of former Gov. Mitt Romney, not McCain aides."
"The sources said nearly 80 percent of Romney’s former staff was absorbed by McCain and these individuals were responsible for what amounts to a premeditated, last-minute sabotage of Palin."
… aides loyal to Romney inside the McCain campaign, said The Scoop, reportedly saw
that Palin would be a serious contender for the Republican nomination in 2012 or 2016, which made her a threat to another presidential quest by Romney.


Erick Erickson said:
"These staffers are now out trying to finish her off ….hoping it would ingratiate themselves with Mitt Romney."


"Who's the Palin Leaker from the McCain Campaign?
National Review Online The publication of a Vanity Fair profile of Sarah Palin
appears to have opened old wounds in the McCain campaign.
... the source of the “Diva” leak was Nicolle Wallace’s husband."


Kathleen Parker: "[I]t is increasingly clear that Palin is a problem." "Parker ... says something publicly that many of us have thought privately
but lacked the courage to say out loud - Palin should step down:"


"Kathleen Parker: After Interviews, Palin Should Bow Out"


Kathleen Parker: "Romney would bring more than squeaky clean qualifications
and youthful good looks to the ticket.
Romney would seem a logical choice."


"Parker: Romney raised bar on freedoms"
Kathleen Parker: "If Kennedy's speech was an important landmark in American political history,
Romney's was surpassing. With heartfelt humility and poetic eloquence,
he tracked the nation's struggle with and for freedom."


Staggering bigotry of Kathleen Parker - UPDATED"


Who benefits most from Sanford meltdown? Californian (that's right) Mitt Romney


"Peeking Out From the McCain Wreckage: Mitt Romney"

"Someone's got to say it: IS MITT ROMNEY RESPONSIBLE FOR OBAMA'S VICTORY?"

"Vanity: Team Romney Sabotaged Palin and Continuing to Do So?"

"Romney Supporters Trashing Palin"

"Romney advisors sniping at Palin?"



29 posted on 10/03/2010 5:09:01 AM PDT by Diogenesis ('Freedom is the light of all sentient beings.' - Optimus Prime)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch
Why would you associate yourself with .... Mondale?

Think.


30 posted on 10/03/2010 5:10:22 AM PDT by Diogenesis ('Freedom is the light of all sentient beings.' - Optimus Prime)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

Yeah, I wouldn’t want to.
You really are slow, aren’t you?


31 posted on 10/03/2010 5:50:12 AM PDT by counterpunch (End the Government Monopoly!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

A couple things.
1) McCain-Palin weren’t ahead of 0bama once from the point McCain said “I believe the fundamentals of our economy are strong” after the banking collapse in September. So your “some polls” were mixing in a large dose of secret sauce.

2) I don’t bother reading rambling copy&paste manifestos. No one on FR does. So you and the other frequent offenders are just wasting your time compiling them.


32 posted on 10/03/2010 5:59:41 AM PDT by counterpunch (End the Government Monopoly!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch
What are you doing out in the field to help your choice in that race?

Donating money, doing phone calls, walking precincts etc?

33 posted on 10/03/2010 7:32:28 AM PDT by Syncro (Tea Party Express IV: Liberty At the Ballot Box! Oct 18th - Nov 1st.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

Comment #34 Removed by Moderator

To: counterpunch

Your defense of Romney and RomneyCARE are really taking
hold here on FR. [/s]

Romney and his (your?) team threw the Election to Obama
in 2008, and it will not be forgotten.
It has not worked out well except for RomneyBOTs
and their business partner, Soros.


35 posted on 10/03/2010 11:19:47 AM PDT by Diogenesis ('Freedom is the light of all sentient beings.' - Optimus Prime)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj; Impy; bamahead; AzaleaCity5691

This is an odd turn of events. As one poster said, Romney should stick to endorsing candidate from Democrat-dominiated states.


36 posted on 10/03/2010 2:27:52 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (Obama's more worried about Israelis building houses than he is about Islamists building atomic bombs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Syncro

I have 435 “choices” running for the House.
And unlike TPX not ONE of them is a Democrat!
I actually want Pelosi GONE.


37 posted on 10/03/2010 2:49:56 PM PDT by counterpunch (End the Government Monopoly!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

I’m defending neither Romney nor RomneyCare.
I think Romney is DOA for 2012, and have stated that.
Hopefully the 2012 field will offer better choices than either Romney or Palin. Either way, it is foolish to lock yourself into a candidate in a race with no one running in it yet. Let’s wait and see what the race looks like in year, then start making a choice.


38 posted on 10/03/2010 3:14:10 PM PDT by counterpunch (End the Government Monopoly!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch
Nobody has kept Romney's candidacy alive like the copy and paste Romney haters. Merely opposing him isn't enough. Merely pointing out there are far better candidates and supporting them isn't enough. If you don't hate him with a purple passion and admit that he is worse than Obama and the devil combined, then you are a Romneybot according to this raving lunatic fringe.

Understand now?

39 posted on 10/03/2010 4:36:01 PM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Mind-numbed Robot; llandres

Thanks for the astute observations. It is nice to hear from someone other than the raving lunatic fringe, who seem to dominate every thread involving the Bush family’s designated placeholder.


40 posted on 10/03/2010 4:38:58 PM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
rotfl
41 posted on 10/03/2010 4:45:07 PM PDT by greyfoxx39 (We now have confirmation that Barack Obama truly loves poor people. He is creating so many!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued; fieldmarshaldj; AzaleaCity5691; greyfoxx39

Good sign from this guy (teacher’s union patsy as I recall) or is he just playing to conservatives?


42 posted on 10/05/2010 11:02:10 PM PDT by Impy (Don't call me red.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson