If she is a weak candidate herself, why would supporting and campaigning for someone else gives the candidate in question a tremendous fund raising and strategic boost? If Sarah's campaigning does offer those types of advantages to a conservative GOP candidate, she must be a good conservative herself, or else she couldn’t motivate conservatives and bring their support with her public appearances and message.
She either is a strong conservative that can motivate conservative voters, or she isn't. Your logic is faulty, but considering a screen name like yours, I can only imagine that ol’ sparky fried any sense of logic and reasoning on your brain.
Because some conservatives are infatuated with her. They fooled themselves into thinking she is the second coming of Ronald Reagan, despite her less than conservative record and less than principled compromises on multiple issues.
The Palin worship is almost the equivalent of the Obama worship in the last election cycle.
Thus, if Palin tells her minions to get behind a candidate, they will do so.
He's hardly worthy of discussion.
Perhaps ridicule and derision would be better because of his agenda and closed mind, but my advice is don't give him any respect because he's not worth it.