Posted on 05/22/2014 3:33:40 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
The myth that the movement was all about economic issues -- not social ones -- is finally laid bare. Here's how.
Jim Newell hit the nail on the head about the alleged “revenge of the GOP establishment” in this week’s primary elections. Yes, they are all Tea Partyers now. Who needs the label when they are getting everything they want from the establishment?
In fact, the Tea Party has always been populated by the rank and file far right of the party. Yes, they expressed hostility to their elected officials in Washington. They were angry that the Democrats won a majority and they blamed their leadership for letting that happen. But as John Boehner explained just yesterday:
"You get in these primary elections – they are hard-fought battles and sometimes – listen, there is not that much, not that big a difference between what you call the tea party and your average conservative Republican."
Indeed. Nonetheless, it is interesting that so far in these primaries the major victory claimed by the Tea Partyers doesn’t feature a standard libertarian-ish right-wing Republican railing against Big Government and babbling about Benghazi!™. It features a hardcore member of the Christian right, which is hardly the image of the Tea Party in the political press. That would be Ben Sasse of Nebraska, the Yale-educated history professor who had the backing of Tea Party groups like Freedomworks, the Senate Conservatives Fund and Club for Growth, and Tea Party icons Sarah Palin and Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas. He won the primary against establishment-backed State Treasurer Scott Osborne. Yes, he hates Big Government as much as any right-wing Republican, that goes without saying. But Sasse is motivated by his belief that the U.S. is a Christian nation under siege from that Big Government, not by his belief in free markets and low taxes.
Sarah Posner at Religion Dispatches unearthed his doctoral thesis from 2004 and it’s a fascinating treatise on the origins of the modern religious right in America. Unlike most historians, he believes that the conservative movement grew up in the 1960s not out of rebellion against the civil rights stances of the Democratic Party but rather the “secularization” of the culture in the wake of the Supreme Court rulings banning school prayer and Bible reading. He even goes so far as to claim that rather than a cynical decision to stoke the flames of Southern racism with the Southern strategy, it was Richard Nixon’s deep understanding of the Christian culture that led him to persuade evangelicals and conservative Catholics to join the GOP and usher in the era of conservatism in the last decades of the 20th century. It’s a novel understanding of that history, to say the least. Most historians cite Nixon’s pursuit of blue-collar Catholics as part of the strategy to peel off working-class votes with racial resentment. But Sasse’s dissertation is evidently persuasive in at least some respects.
But regardless of his level of accomplishment as a scholar, Ben Sasse clearly sees the world through the lens of a conservative Christian crusader. According to his website, he is a proponent of the most radical interpretation of religious freedom that’s in circulation today on the far right:
Ben Sasse believes that our right to the free exercise of religion is co-equal to our right to life. This is not a negotiable issue. Government cannot force citizens to violate their religious beliefs under any circumstances. He will fight for the right of all Americans to act in accordance with their conscience.
One wonders if he believes the child molestation at Warren Jeffs’ polygamous compound or Shariah Law honor killings are also non-negotiable religious beliefs that the government cannot force those people to violate under any circumstances. In any case, he is certainly a proponent of the Christian right manifesto, the Manhattan Declaration, which aims to change the strategy of the religious right from a purely moral argument to a legal doctrine that exempts religious adherents from following the law of the land.
One might wonder why the so-called libertarian Tea Partyers would back such a fellow even if he were right on all their economic issues. But one of the major misapprehensions about the Tea Party has always been the idea that it was not socially conservative, as if all those tricorner hat-wearing patriots were solely concerned with tax rates and regulations. The Pew Poll showed otherwise years ago:
Tea Party supporters tend to have conservative opinions not just about economic matters, but also about social issues such as abortion and same-sex marriage. In addition, they are much more likely than registered voters as a whole to say that their religion is the most important factor in determining their opinions on these social issues. And they draw disproportionate support from the ranks of white evangelical Protestants.
A Tea Party by any other name would smell as socially conservative. Just ask Ted Cruz, another Ivy League Tea Partyer who recently made a pilgrimage to Liberty University and declared, “These are troubled times, and religious liberty, the very first liberty in the Bill of Rights, the very first protection we have, has never been more in peril than it is right now.” Or Sarah Palin, another Tea Party favorite who wears her social conservatism on her sleeve.
The point is that whether it’s the establishment winning as they ostensibly did in this week’s primaries or the Tea Party upsetting the conventional wisdom as they did last week in nominating Ben Sasse, it makes no difference. The three-legged stool of the GOP — family values, small government and national security — is as solid as it’s ever been, whatever they choose to call themselves. Sure, they may have a few Rand Paul fans ineffectually batting at one of those legs, but the Tea Party is right there with the establishment holding it steady.
*******
Digby is the pseudonym of liberal political blogger Heather Parton from Santa Monica, California who founded the blog Hullabaloo. She has been called one of the "leading and most admired commentators" of the progressive blogosphere.[1]
Digby began as a commenter on the blogs of Bartcop and Atrios and launched her own blog on January 1, 2003,[2] calling it Hullabaloo "because one function of blogs is to cause a ruckus"[3] and decorating it with a picture of a screaming Howard Beale from the film Network. She has been joined by other bloggers on Hullabaloo, including composer Richard Einhorn, who blogs under the name "Tristero".
Digby was a Navy brat who graduated from Lathrop High School in Fairbanks, Alaska. She studied theater at San Jose State University (then known as San Jose State College) and worked on the Trans-Alaska Pipeline System and for a number of film companies, including Island Pictures, Polygram, and Artisan Entertainment.[2]
She won the 2005 Koufax award for blog writing and accepted the Paul Wellstone Award on behalf of the progressive blogosphere from the Campaign for America's Future at their "Take Back America" conference.[4] Digby had initially kept her identity secret and it was widely assumed that Digby was male until she made an appearance at the 2007 CAF conference to accept the award.[4] Digby has since started writing regularly at Salon.[5] She also won the 2014 Hillman Prize for Opinion and Analysis Journalism.
What an ass.
Course it is Salon and they require it.
Oh, okay. Now I know who I am. Thanks, Salon!
The writer is from California. That explains it. A clueless writer who hails from a truly clueless state.
What’s with these lovers of socialism? The Tea Party is just regular folks who want their lives, freedoms, and country back. God bless them.
There was a reason it was referred to as Godless Communism with disgust.
And a further reason why people left an increasingly Godless Democratic party.
Which is that the latter had become the former.
The left, openly displaying ignorance.
A Tea Party by any other name would smell as socially conservative. Just ask Ted Cruz, another Ivy League Tea Partyer who recently made a pilgrimage to Liberty University and declared, “These are troubled times, and religious liberty, the very first liberty in the Bill of Rights, the very first protection we have, has never been more in peril than it is right now.” Or Sarah Palin, another Tea Party favorite who wears her social conservatism on her sleeve.
The tea party is made up of the more conservative, which also means the more religious, and more social conservative, only idiots thought that the tea party was made up of libertarians.
What is this fool babbling about? Doesn’t Salon have any journalistic standards? Yeah, I know the answer to that one.....
It still fits.
Yup, Hate filled Leftwing kook witch-harpy from California.
The hosts of FR hail from California as do many thousands
of FReepers. There is a message for you if you click on
Sivad at the bottom of this post.
Presenting Ms. Digby. Kind of has moonbat written all over it.
Someone should tell the former Democratic County Committee woman I met at a TEA Party rally.
There are good folk in California, but they are far outnumbered by evil ones, Especially in the big cities. Much of the evil propaganda from which we suffer is spewed out of Los Angeles disguised as entertainment.
Victor Davis Hanson is one of my favorite columnists, and he constantly opines about the rot permeating California.
My apologies to the decent folk of California for any inadvertent offense, but your state has been tarnished by the activities of very evil people who dominate the culture there. (And the rest of the nation as well.)
Many people on the left still dismiss the tea party as the same old religious right, but the evidence says they are wrong. The tea party has strong libertarian roots and is a functionally libertarian influence on the Republican Party.
http://www.cato.org/publications/policy-analysis/libertarian-roots-tea-party
Very nice post and much appreciated by this Californian. There
are certainly evil people who dominate the popular culture thru the
left wing media. But that is not the only culture. As you never see
the culture of the normal folks of Kansas, Oklahoma, and South
Carolina portrayed by the dominant media, you also don’t get the
big picture when it comes to small town California.
Part of California’s problem started when in good times the
politicians loosened welfare requirements and opened the
floodgates to the “takers” from everywhere, those who are
happy to vote for more goodies for themselves. Many of those
people who created our problems came from elsewhere including
politicians we ALL know like Pelosi, Boxer, Maxine Waters, and
Willie Brown. I do fear for our Texan friends who are in the
process of improving their economy and destroying their
state at the same time. Massive population increases can
bring the kind of negative results that are killing California.
Thanks again.
Actually you have it reversed, most people think of the tea party as kind of libertarian because it’s focus has not been on social issues, that is why the article is written as it is.
Actually the tea party is made up of what one would expect, conservatives, people who are more religious, and more social conservative than the average republican.
“New Poll: Tea Party Overwhelmingly Christian And Socially Conservative. by JJ SUTHERLAND October 05, 2010”
“Tea Party support correlates to religious affiliation, survey finds 2011 By Dan Gilgoff, CNN Belief Blog Co-Editor”
“Evangelicals and Tea Party Overlap in Congress, Public”
“Libertarians Are Not the Tea Party.
“Though politicians and analysts often conflate the two, libertarians have different views on many issues than Tea Partiers—and they’re not as big a faction of the GOP.”
“The Christian Right in Disguise?
New research confirms that the Tea Party firmly unites right-wing politics and evangelical Christianity, a fact so problematic that it can make even Christine O’Donnell speechless.”
About half of the tea party is not only social conservatives and religious, but call themselves part of the hated, religious right.
That’s not a quote from me, but from the article that was linked ... :-) ...
What killed California, aside form the immigration, was that California was never right wing, social conservative, like Texas is, and always was.
California always leaned rino/libertarian, so it didn’t have the underlying muscle to prevent being absorbed by the left.
Texas actively fights for it’s conservatism AND, it’s Christian conservatism.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.