the author (snicker)
Paul’s panties are being twisted into a knot from tet another of Obama’s f-ups. He wants the wolves called off. That will not be happening.
Sweep, sweep, sweep. Sweep it under the rug!
What? What are you talking about? It never happened!
Time for Paul To KMA!
We may have to let it go... to focus on Obama losing Iraq to Al Qaeda
No conservative objected to his repatriation.
They objected to the blatantly illegal way it was obtained.
Whether or not Bergdahl was fit for the laughing academy when he left post is immaterial.
The administration lied about his physical health.
The administration lied about his service.
The administration illegally failed to notify Congress.
The administration paid a ridiculously high price and tried to dodge the scrutiny that should have accompanied the move.
When our enemies tell us what to do or not to do, we should listen and do the opposite.
This message is aimed at our weak knee Rinos in DC.
Bergdahl is a distraction from Obama’s treason.
Obama has returned 5 top enemy commanders to the enemy which has not surrendered! A blatant overt act of aid to the enemy.
Also: 8 USC § 2339A Providing material support to terrorists
Typical Alinsky tactic of ridiculing those who make legitimate cases against the left but - I will be saving this nugget for when these scumbags kill their first Americans and put it right back in his face
How does this affect criticism of the very bad decision Obama made? The White House did not know about this diary nor about his Coast Guard discharge. This information may or may not bear on the man’s fate, but it has nothing to do with the very bad decision Obama made.
The BIG issue here, and one that make Obama a prime candidate for ouster is the release of the five Taliban generals. This has clearly aided and abetted the enemy and and armed the enemy with a heightened threat to the lives and safety of Americans.
the author (snicker)
Time for right to let go of Bowe Bergdahl political controversy
So Bergdahl is also a liar, in addition to being a deserter and not worth trading five senior terrorists for - illegally. Is that the best case they can make for forgetting yet another bad Obama decision?
“wildly exaggerate the danger of the five former Taliban”
Well of course, five really nice guys that were just down on their luck.
Considering some 55% of Americans say that whole issue was FUBAR from the start... hell no, we’re not letting it go.
I would like to see those on our side concentrate less, right now, on the actions of the deserter and much more on Obama’s act of treason in releasing the Bergdahl 5 without informing Congress. That is the most important part of the story, IMO.
How many articles/column inches over how many months did WaPo dedicate to the far more important national security issue of “Macaca?”