Posted on 01/29/2015 3:26:12 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
The Embarracuda is finished. Where will her peeps go? To one obvious successor. She may not field dress a moose, but she castrates pigs.
Before the 2016 campaign for president could even begin in earnest, the greatest political romance of our times has already died. And it could make all the difference next November.
In a turn that was perhaps inevitable but nonetheless remarkable, Sarah Palin delivered a hyped-up speech (at Iowa's high-profile Freedom Summit) that drew disappointing reviews from within her own base of support.
To the surprise of no one, Palin's critics blew a gasket straining to capture the extent of their contempt for the warmed-over address. An apparent TelePrompTer malfunction -- the nightmare of pols ten times more polished and canny than Palin -- only added to their sense of gleeful horror.
But with her rambling rehash of familiar tropes and postures, Palin finally outlasted the patience and goodwill of her own core constituency -- the red-meat grassroots and the movement conservative media. Without any infrastructure, without any institutional platform, Palin could always count on her brand of performance art to put going rogue back in vogue. No longer.
Small-time soap opera, you say. End of an error. Actually, this is a big deal. Because the Palin phenomenon -- the popularity, the opportunism, the branding, and, yes, the politics -- all arose from a single source. Palin's importance wasn't as a new kind of conservative, ideologically speaking. It was as a new kind of politician.
There had never been a Republican or a Democrat with Palin's combination of personality, character, youthfulness, and very specifically gendered sort of sex. Even to the critics, she didn't come off as a pencil-necked weenie like Bobby Jindal or a sound-body-sound-mind orthogonian like Paul Ryan.
Being a woman helped. But, to borrow a line of analysis from critical theory, Palin wasn't gendered the same way as other political women, in any party. She was no granny in a pantsuit, like Elizabeth Dole or Hillary Clinton. She doesn't come off as fustily professional as Carly Fiorina or Meg Whitman. Palin's character type can never be a career politician because she's not even a career woman, in that stereotypical manner now apotheosized by Yahoo’s Marissa Meyer.
Palin's life experience mattered because it betokened the entry into politics of a new kind of woman -- equally into sports, guns, and kids. Palin's character type eventually appeared to exist everywhere across the vast red swath of the American interior. Conservatives have long understood in what complex way their youthful women could be masculine without losing the femininity. (Tocqueville bemusedly praised American ladies' "manly virtue.") The revolution was in a conservative woman mobilizing that naturally grown manner in the arena of national politics.
However you choose to slice and dice gender identities, you must admit that Palin's success arose from her own — and that losing her appeal in spite of it, much like earning an F in English, took a lot of willpower to pull off.
The failure was on glaring display when the right-leaning Washington Examiner went in search of praise for Palin's prospects, but notable figures in the conservative mediasphere balked. Red-state stalwarts like HotAir's Ed Morrissey sighed that her speech "wasn't well prepared”; Gabriel Malor at Ace of Spades HQ said simply: "She is done."
Voices like these, once locked into mutual admiration with the rogue Republican who decried the “lamestream” media, can't by themselves consign Palin to the political scrapheap. As they freely admit, however, the grassroots has "generally moved on," too, in the words of Ben Domenech (whose website, The Federalist, I have written for).
So the essential question for 2016 is where, or whom, they'll move on to. The tea party ethos that Palin helped midwife may be protean and loosely organized, but it hasn't weakened much as a political force. This year's crop of presumptive Republican candidates offers the conservative base its strongest, broadest, and most credible choices ever. Domenech could plausibly suggest to the Examiner that contenders with an outsider appeal, such as Gov. Scott Walker Or Sen. Ted Cruz, were well positioned to attract and energize Palin's former constituency.
But character type is deeper, and it’s prior to politics. The true heir to Palin's constituency will be a woman. How could it be otherwise?
It's a question not lost on the Republican elite, which is smart enough to know there is no real reason Palin's character type can't be brought into a more establishmentarian alignment. Enter Iowa Sen. Joni Ernst — servicewoman, heartland heroine, and the no-brainer choice to respond to the president's State of the Union on behalf of the whole Republican Party. Even a pig-castrating farm girl, you see, can find her way into the arms of such king- and queen-makers as Mitt Romney.
To her credit, Ernst possesses far more discipline than Palin, whose taste for guns did not extend into a longing for the military life. But if the whiff of the establishment gets too strong around her, the base will balk -- just ask Marco Rubio. And the jilted Palin constituency will be up for grabs again.
she really send them into a tizzy, doesn’t she!
you can almost see him mincing around the room stomping he feet at the end of EACH SENTENCE
Must be getting paid by the incoherent word....the left cannot stand real conservatives, as well.
All this criticism over a speech. A friggin speech.
At a venue in which nobody has declared for anything. Essentially, the speed dating version of CPAC.
Despite the author’s paid-by-the-word style, I suspect he might be right: The GOP-E will try to pass off Joni Ernst as a tamed successor to Sarah.
It will not work, and Ernst may not prove to be as manageable as the GOP-E hopes.
I’m no Palinista, but this anti-Sarah crap is too much!
Is this guy a fag? I can almost hear the lisping in his words.
WOW these idiots really have nothing better to do do they? All they do every single night is sit around on their PCs and write and write and write about how much they hate Sarah Palin..look how much this moron wrote, and all about Sarah, it really is hilarious the stupidity of these lefty loons
Sarah’s words salad had more substance than any public address by a GOPer or democrat in over a decade.
She laid out the path forward for conservatives
You decide.
A LOT of time.
I’ll vote for her .......
So one sub-par speech and it’s over.
HAven’t we heard the left do this time and again? If we were to believe them the prolife movement would have been dead 100 times over, the pro-2a crowd would have been finished a dozen times, Rush Limbaugh’s career would have ended when Clinton was elected and a bunch of times since then, ...
These are propagandad pieces. It may very well have been a sucky speech and not a great one by her standards. So what. Who has ever seen a piss-poor review of Hillary’s $300,000 speeches lately and concluded “It’s Over?” I haven’t seen the media en masse talking points being parroted on the nightly news.
Sick, are they not?
The name, of course, gives it away.
Limp wristed yellow bellied Obamas, all.
I’m pretty sure Jim plagiarized that from Maureen Dowd.
Judging from the picture in post #12, I'd say he probably spends a lot more time thinking about Judy Garland.
The Daily Beast is a Commie Joke. Not worth the bandwidth.
Did this same author say Obama was finished after his first debate fiasco? Doubtful. But, the rules are always different for Democrats, arent they?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.