Posted on 08/21/2015 9:11:02 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
A year ago, political insiders expected Rand Paul to dominate in Nevada and Iowa, the first two states to hold presidential nominating caucuses. Now, as campaign season ramps up in earnest and he continues to slide in national polls, Pauls propensity to skip important GOP events has left Republican voters wondering whether he is willing to put in the work to seize his natural advantages in these two early states. In 2012, supporters of Ron Pauls presidential campaign took over the state Republican parties in both Iowa and Nevada. The elder Paul finished third in the 2012 Nevada caucuses with 19 percent of the vote, and third in the Iowa caucuses with 21 percent. That show of force appeared to give Rand Paul an edge in the two earliest caucus states as the 2016 campaign kicked off. The caucus format, which rewards candidates with enthusiastic and motivated supporters willing to sit through a sometimes hours-long meeting rather than merely checking a name on a ballot, was also thought to play to the younger Pauls strengths. Paul shares many of his fathers ideas, but his more traditionally Republican brand of libertarianism has made him a palatable option to some in the partys establishment, something his dad never was. It could be a potent combination, if hes able to draw in new voters without alienating the die-hard supporters who backed his dad. But in recent weeks, Paul has skipped a pair of important GOP events. And as reports of turmoil within his campaign continue to surface, Republicans in Iowa and Nevada are wondering if he is willing to put forth the effort needed to convert new voters to his cause. Just this month, Paul has missed two major events in the earliest-voting caucus states. Last Saturday, the inaugural Basque Fry in Gardnerville, Nev., informally kicked off the Silver States caucus season with speeches by four GOP presidential contenders. Paul was in Haiti performing pro-bono eye surgery, and his campaign had no presence at the event, which gathered together 1,700 Republicans from across the state. Paul was not alone in that approach of the candidates who did not appear at the event, only Marco Rubio had a campaign staffer present doling out bumper stickers and voter commitment cards. But it still looked like a missed opportunity for the Kentucky senator in a state that is predisposed to like him.
That same Haiti trip will keep Paul from attending the Iowa State Fair, which wraps up its eleven-day run on Sunday. Instead, Kentucky representative Thomas Massie, a surrogate, will campaign for Paul throughout Iowa on Saturday. Massie, according to a schedule provided by the campaign, will not attend the fair. Its like hes fallen off the face of the earth, says former Iowa GOP political director Craig Robinson, who writes The Iowa Republican blog. Robinson points to Pauls absence from the fair, along with some of the cattle calls that have been held in the state. People wonder, How much does he really want this? he says. Robinson says hes been favorably impressed with some of the Paul campaigns events. Just last month on his blog, he documented the impressive organization of an event the campaign held in Poweshiek County. But, he says, with this big a field, its just, out of sight, out of mind. Robinson is not alone in noticing Pauls absence from the fair. Whats his problem? one Republican consultant aligned with another candidate asks indignantly. Steve Grubbs, the well-respected operative who is Pauls chief strategist in Iowa, says its just not true that hes not paying enough attention to the Hawkeye State. According to the Des Moines Registers candidate tracker, Paul has held 56 events in the state over 20 days, the seventh most events of any candidate running, Republican or Democrat. The perception of indifference, Grubbs says, comes from the particular events Paul is choosing to attend.
If youre talking about the multi-candidate events where everyone gets two lines in the newspaper the next day, thats not necessarily our strategy, Grubbs says. The Paul team, he says, prefers to send the candidate to individual events, many in far-flung counties where no one would hold a cattle call, and where organizers leave having signed up many new volunteers. Would I love to have him at the State Fair? Of course, Grubbs says. But he adds that Pauls work in Haiti was more important. Even when hes on the campaign trail, though, Pauls curious scheduling goes beyond a few missed cattle calls. On Tuesday, he will kick off what his campaign is billing as a Western Tour, traveling to Washington, Idaho, Wyoming, and Utah. One place he wont be stopping on that tour? Nevada, which holds the first-in-the-west caucuses. Pauls campaign says a multi-day campaign trip to Nevada is in the works. Still, Nevada Republicans describe Paul as under the radar and say they have witnessed little in the way of on-the-ground organizing. He doesnt seem to be a strong presence at this point, says former governor Robert List, who endorsed Scott Walker last week.
Earlier this year, there was an effort to change Nevadas nominating caucuses to a primary, largely designed to blunt Pauls edge in the early state. The proposed change failed in June, a major victory for the Kentucky senator. But Nevada Republicans say that the perception that Nevada is fertile territory for Paul has weakened since then. Pauls campaign says that if it seems quiet in Nevada, its because they havent yet kicked off their efforts there. We have a very strong grassroots organization with many thousands of activists, says Richard Bunce, a senior political advisor for Paul in Nevada. Theyre ready. Theyre like the silent army, but once they turn on theyll be really loud.
The campaign has yet to open an office in the state, though Bunce and Gor say one will open in the next several weeks, probably coinciding with Pauls as-yet-unannounced trip. Gor says there are multiple paid staff in Nevada, though he declines to provide specifics. Nevada remains Rand Paul country, despite what others might say, he adds. Bunce says that once the campaign kicks off, Nevadans will start hearing quite a bit from the Paul campaign. He dismisses their lack of organizational presence at the Basque Fry, claiming that they didnt feel the event, hosted by Nevada Attorney General Adam Laxalt, would draw any of the anti-establishment voters who tend to back Paul. Grassroots people arent going pay $50 to eat . . . whatever it was, Bunce says, laughing. (It was lamb testicles.) Thats all well and good, but some Nevada Republicans are quick to point out that Ron Paul finished a distant third in the state last time around, behind Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich. Rand Paul may start with a readymade corps of supporters, but he cannot win without converting voters who were unwilling to support his dad. Eschewing events because the campaign deems the voters present to be too establishment is not the way to do that. And it is still not fully clear how many of his fathers supporters will stay on board with Pauls campaign. In Iowa, Grubbs says, that support is absolutely translating. And in Nevada, We are excited to have the vast majority of his fathers supporters, Gor claims. With such a fractured GOP field we have a core constituency which is unmatched.
But Paul faces a historically deep field of rival candidates, several of whom can compete with him for anti-establishment and even libertarian voters. If he does not appear to be willing to work to win those voters, they could look elsewhere. Right now, Paul is at around 3 or 4 percent in surveys of Iowa. He sits in the same range in the limited number of surveys that have been released in Nevada. Caucus states are notoriously difficult to poll, however, because no one really knows what the strength of a campaigns organization is until that organization turns out voters on caucus day. And some observers remain wary of counting Paul out. These guys could organize at Christmas time and youd never know, says one Nevada Republican. He could resurrect.
Ran out of free dope.
I use to like the guy but the p!ssing match he and Krispy got into at the debate knocked them both out of the game.
He acted like the bratty little brother during the debates?
“Rand Paul Was Supposed to Dominate Iowa & Nevada. What Happened?:
He opened his mouth and started talking, IMHO.
The author does not appear to understand how non-primary states work. The name of the game is organizing local activists into a network strong enough to dominate the state’s delegate selection process. It is very very different from how a primary works.
LOL !!! - I liked Rand Paul - stop it ...
He opened his mouth and these results happened.
He’s just not Presidental material but in a lot of ways I do appreciate his work more than most.
Rand Paul attacked Trump during the debate. That was his death warrant.
Not only is he nuttier than his dad, he is as fruity as a Californian.
Rand Paul happened.
Seriously, I think he became mealy-mouthed and hedged his positions, afraid to take a clear stand. He sounded more like a lawyer that the fine Doctor he is. Too bad.
He got TRUMPED!
Somebody with a toupe happened
Ron Paul always had good early showings when a small but dedicated group of supporters could manipulate the process. Rand tried being a slightly less kooky version of Ron which did help him pick up some support but did not appeal to his dad’s zealous supporters.
After you have shot yourself in the foot the first time, the second, third and fourth (or more) time does not to seem to hurt as much.
“Quick Draw McGraw” did not get the muzzle of the pistol clear of the holster before firing.
Well, if you keep shooting in the same place, you’re just hitting the same hole and passing thru...
GO PAUL GO HOME !
It was a really stupid political move for Rand Paul to attack Trump. It’s not that Trump is the best of the bunch, but Trump has been the most effective at challenging the GOP establishment.
Paul is an anti-establishment candidate; he should have joined Trump in this respect.
When Paul accused Trump of buying friendship with politicians during the debate,,Then Trump mentioned how much Paul appreciated the money Trump gave him,,,The look on Pauls face showed it all and how quickly Paul shut up told it all.I lost all respect for Paul at that moment.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.