Atheist Never Married "Pledge Of Allegiance" Daughter's Mother, Case Should Be Dismissed

BushCountry.org ^ | 10/21/22 | Rev. Austin Miles

[PhiKapMom]

Thanks for posting this -- wonder why this wasn't brought out before -- sounds like someone has been doing some digging! What a lowlife that guy is!

[Cicero]

Humm. I assume this is true, because there would be huge damages if it weren't.

California judges are a breed of their own. I wonder what will happen next.

[Southack]

The case should **NOT** be dismissed, as someone else will simply file a similar one.

No, the case should be ruled against so that the issue will become forever dead.

[AMNZ]

Surely our courts have remedies for the time and cost this perjurer has brought on the American public and its legal system. I urge serious reparations be laid upon him immediately.

[TheAngryClam]

I think they have joint custody now.

[TheAngryClam]

No, the case should be ruled against so that the issue will become forever dead.

Sure worked well with Bowers v. Hardwick keeping there from ever being a Lawrence v. Texas, right?

[onyx]

The daughter is against the lawsuit her non-custodial father filed and she has repeatedly stated her opinion many times.

Let SCOTUS put this to rest, once and hopefully, for all time.

[Duke Nukum]

I saw this nutjob on H&C last week. The guy's a total nutjob. He'd be locked up if we still had our snake pits in working order.

He wants a seperation of church and state, I want to live outside the asylum.

Maybe I should sue him on behalf of my fictional daughter?

I mean, there aren't any snake pits anymore, so what do I have to lose?

[CyberAnt]

This has been my contention all along. After the guy filed the lawsuit, the mother was interviewed and it was found that it was not the child who was complaining about having to say the pledge, it was just the "atheist" father who didn't want her to say it.

To me .. that says the suit was filed "with intent to deceive". The guy lied about the whole issue. The case has no merit. I hope the USSC throws the guy and his lawsuit out the door. Actually, I don't even understand how the case merits being heard in the first place.

[ElkGroveDan]

Elk Grove Knights of Columbus BUMP!

http://home.earthlink.net/~cpoiani/knights/pledge.htm

[CobaltBlue]

Putting the shoe on the other foot - are you saying that non-custodial parents should have no say in how their children are raised?

[Cicero]

Actually, I don't even understand how the case merits being heard in the first place.

Because the judge in question obviously wanted to create some law, and this case gave him the opportunity to do so.

The same thing happened in Roe v. Wade. Justice Brennan was ready to legalize abortion, so he arranged to have a bogus case brought before the Supreme Court. Then he primed that idiot Blackmun, whose name was put on the case as presiding justice, telling him what line to take. All that stuff about privacy being in the penumbra of the constitution.

[Prime Choice]

Atheist Michael Newdow lied to the court in order to bring a case to declare the Pledge of Allegiance illegal.

When this is all over with, can we push to make sure this guy is charged with perjury? Please? Pretty please?

[Cicero]

Putting the shoe on the other foot - are you saying that non-custodial parents should have no say in how their children are raised?

The main issue is that he lied to the court under oath and had no standing to bring a lawsuit.

[OLDCU]

Mr. Newlowlife.

[Hugin]

Paternity rights and and obligations are not dependent on marriage. Did he claim in the case that they were married? It seems irrelevant.

[truthandjustice1]

"Putting the shoe on the other foot - are you saying that non-custodial parents should have no say in how their children are raised?"

I don't believe that's the point. The father misrepresented his daughters beliefs in order to further his own agenda. This has nothing to do with matters custody.

[Graybeard58]

...An atheist lied? Fancy that!

[Pan_Yans Wife]

Is it possible she is a "common law" wife?