Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Human evolution can't cope with fast food, say scientists
Ananova ^ | October 22, 2003 | Unknown

Posted on 10/22/2003 4:21:49 AM PDT by HarleyD

Calorie-packed fast food encourages over-eating and weight gain because it is out of step with human evolution, scientists have said.

They pointed out that humans are designed for conditions in which food is relatively scarce and low in energy.

But fast food from take-aways and convenience stores is typically energy dense. You do not need to eat much of it to consume a lot of calories.

The result is people accidentally over-eat without feeling particularly full.

Nutrition experts Professor Andrew Prentice and Dr Susan Jebb highlighted the problem by combining British and African diet study data with information on the ingredients in fast food.

Professor Prentice, head of the Medical Research Council's International Nutrition Group at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, said: "We all possess a weak innate ability to recognise foods with a high energy density. We tend to assess food intake by the size of the portion, yet a fast food meal contains many more calories than a similar-sized portion of a healthy meal.

"Since the dawn of agriculture, the systems regulating human appetite have evolved for the low energy diet still being consumed in rural areas of the developing world where obesity is almost non-existent.

"Our bodies were never designed to cope with the very energy dense foods consumed in the West and this is contributing to a major rise in obesity."

The World Health Organisation estimates there are 300 million obese people worldwide.

In England, obesity rates have trebled in the past 25 years. Experts predict that by the end of the decade three in 10 UK adults will be obese.


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: crevolist; fastfood
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last
To: AdmSmith
Sorry a typo, Furtermore should be: more Frankfurter
41 posted on 10/22/2003 4:01:10 PM PDT by AdmSmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: tbpiper
Semantics. I might have said that humans are adapted to conditions in which food is realtively scarce. But I may care too much about precision, and journalists definitely don't care enough.
42 posted on 10/22/2003 4:02:25 PM PDT by MattAMiller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: HarleyD
Well, shoot. If I understand the article correctly those Big Macs I used to eat are what's preventing me from growing that third eye in the back of my head I've been working on for years now. Who knew?

Whether you are into design or evolution the article's nuts. The only modern food that has been unaltered genetically over the 10,000-year span of human history is meat from game animals. And 10,000 years is not a lot of time in evolutionary terms.

It gets worse if you buy into the design approach - you'd have to believe that God (or Whoever) formed a fantastically complicated metabolic system around the 1/100000th of a percent of human existence that has subsumed the ascension of Breakfast Jacks and Ho-hos. I'm more of an evo feller myself, but it strikes me that God probably has better things to do with His time...

43 posted on 10/22/2003 4:06:40 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: adam_az
I'm confused.
44 posted on 10/22/2003 4:24:04 PM PDT by Dimensio (Sometimes I doubt your committment to Sparkle Motion!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
I, unfortunately, have been unable to escape fast food entirely, yet I found that I didn't end up any less full if I ate smaller portions. As such, with this strategy of "eating less" combined with a revolutionary weigh-control strategy known as "excercise", I've managed to lose about 20 pounds in three months (I might have been able to lose more, but I actually feel that I've reached an ideal weight for my height).
45 posted on 10/22/2003 4:26:04 PM PDT by Dimensio (Sometimes I doubt your committment to Sparkle Motion!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MattAMiller
I might have said that humans are adapted to conditions in which food is realtively scarce.

I would have said that too, but I would add one more word:
"... humans are adapted to survive conditions in which food is realtively scarce.

This would make it clear that scarcity isn't necessarily our optimal circumstance. We also have brains, so that when food is abundant, we can survive with far less effort, thus freeing us up to do other things ... like chatting on the internet.

46 posted on 10/22/2003 4:27:43 PM PDT by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Scott Peterson thinks Terry Schiavo should be visited by Elian Gonzales.

You've got a french fry stuck in your breathing tube.

47 posted on 10/22/2003 4:32:18 PM PDT by palmer (The preceding post is not harassment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Dimensio
Exercise is not "revolutionary" at all. It actually has been around for many years.
48 posted on 10/22/2003 5:19:56 PM PDT by SamAdams76 (205.2 (-94.8) Homestretch to 200)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
Exercise is not "revolutionary" at all. It actually has been around for many years.

It, ah, was a joke.
49 posted on 10/22/2003 7:02:43 PM PDT by Dimensio (Sometimes I doubt your committment to Sparkle Motion!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Dimensio
Forced to back down, huh?
50 posted on 10/22/2003 7:07:27 PM PDT by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: HarleyD
Calling Dr.Atkins.
51 posted on 10/22/2003 7:12:14 PM PDT by PoorMuttly (Muttly Axiom #1..."What cannot be eaten, must be sprayed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
My tone may have sounded accusatory, though it was really a bit of self-depreciation. I lived a life devoid of any real physical activity until I hit 200 pounds.
52 posted on 10/22/2003 7:36:42 PM PDT by Dimensio (Sometimes I doubt your committment to Sparkle Motion!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Thanks for the heads up!
53 posted on 10/22/2003 7:37:52 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Dimensio
I understood it was a joke. Really I did.
54 posted on 10/22/2003 7:49:09 PM PDT by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Dimensio
Clearly!
55 posted on 10/22/2003 9:03:55 PM PDT by adam_az
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson