Skip to comments.
Matthews, Scholars Strongly Denounce Reagan Smear in CBS Miniseries (Hardball 10-21-03)
MSNBC - Hardball w/ Chris Matthews - Transcript ^
| 21 October 2003
Posted on 10/22/2003 6:43:27 PM PDT by Stultis
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-99 last
To: Stultis
Reagan cut his teeth fighting a communist backed union. They tried to paralyze Hollywoood, with the goal of dominating motion pictures. Baseball bats through windshields, death threats (sound familier, grocers?).
In the face of threats of acid being thrown in his face, he single-handedly (according to the communists) broke the strike.
His wife at the time (Nancy Davis) was liberal, and didn't like it. It led to his divorce.
Notice the mini series left this out.
Ronald Regan single-handedly broke the communist infiltration of the most powerful union in hollywood.
He slept with a .38.
81
posted on
10/23/2003 5:04:31 PM PDT
by
MonroeDNA
(Please become a monthly donor!!! Just $3 a month--you won't miss it, and will feel proud!)
To: Stultis
The VLWC is doing a much better job of driving moderates and undecided's towards our VRWC than we are in attracting them. We should thank them and ask them to continue commiting political suicide.
82
posted on
10/23/2003 6:11:08 PM PDT
by
Chu Gary
To: capydick
Susan Estrich?
Getting old is a terrible thing:
Yeah, but she had that incredibly irritating voice all her life. Even if she was Conservative I would never listen to her!
83
posted on
10/23/2003 6:28:15 PM PDT
by
Chu Gary
To: Steve_Seattle
#18 was from Bush_is_a_Nazi. I don't know what he/she saidI think I quoted all of it when I replied in #33.
84
posted on
10/23/2003 7:00:08 PM PDT
by
Stultis
To: Stultis
The best thing to do is to boycott the series and the sponsors.
85
posted on
10/23/2003 7:05:28 PM PDT
by
yoe
(Term Limits - and 2 terms are the limit for all elected to a Federal office!!)
To: MonroeDNA
His wife at that time was not Nancy Davis, it was Jane Wyman. Nancy Davis is Nancy Reagan.
86
posted on
10/23/2003 7:17:56 PM PDT
by
GWfan
To: Chu Gary
The VLWC is doing a much better job of driving moderates and undecided's towards our VRWC than we are in attracting them.Well, if practice makes perfect, they oughta be. They've been at it for thirty years solid.
Reagan was the exception, though, at attracting people to the right and/or to the Republican Party. He got literally millions of blue-collar Dems to vote Republican, at least at the top of the ticket. Possibly even more important for the long term was the political talent that rallied to Reagan from the dark side. I'm not sufficiently intimate with all phases of American political history to say so with absolute confidence, but late 70's and early 80's may well have seen the most dramatic transfer of political/policy talent between parties that has ever occured. And how quickly it happened! Jean Kirkpatrick didn't change her registration until 1985, and she was among the foot draggers in that regard.
Of course this (like the economic recovery) is another reality that will surely be unknown to viewers of The Reagans.
87
posted on
10/23/2003 7:18:04 PM PDT
by
Stultis
To: All
88
posted on
10/23/2003 7:18:12 PM PDT
by
Bob J
To: yoe
The best thing to do is to boycott the series and the sponsors.Unfortunately I don't think I'll be able to resist seeing what they do with it. I will, however, tune it in through the VCR rather than the digital cable box (and tune the later to Fox News) so I don't contribute to ratings.
89
posted on
10/23/2003 7:21:01 PM PDT
by
Stultis
To: Stultis
I was listening to Micheal Reagan, his son, talking today. He said that the WHOLE THING, not just the AIDS quotes, is a hit job. He said there is not a shred of truth in the movie - he didn't recognize either Reagan or Nancy, the way they were represented.
He said they portrayed his Dad as a doofus dumbbell and idiot without a thought in his head. He said they had him cursing and taking the Lords name in vain and he said his father NEVER did or would consider talking like that.
All in all, he was furious and said the family was hurt.
The way he was talking, I don't think he thought that taking out a quote or two would fix it. The whole thing was inaccurate and totally a smear job.
To: blake6900
...and I bet he's not mentioned in Al Franken's latest outhouse staple item. Ouch, I like to keep stapled items out of the outhouse.
To: Stultis
We will always remember. We will always be proud. We will
always be prepared, so we may always be free.
Normandy, France, June 6, 1984
92
posted on
10/23/2003 9:14:22 PM PDT
by
John Lenin
(I don't believe in miracles, I rely upon them)
To: I still care
The way he was talking, I don't think he thought that taking out a quote or two would fix it. The whole thing was inaccurate and totally a smear job.If that's so I pity the fools stupid enough to sponsor the show. Nevertheless, they must be made to feel the pain. If this turns out to be an a-historical smear, rather than just "interpretation" of historical fact, I think we should press for a written and public repudiation from each and every sponsor.
93
posted on
10/23/2003 9:51:13 PM PDT
by
Stultis
To: Az Joe
I wrote to them:
"To whom it may concern:
If you folks go ahead with your slimy hit piece on Ronald Reagan, I will *permanently* remove CBS from my TV's channel lineup.
Oh -- I hear the folks at CNN are feeling lonely. Say hi to them for me, will you?
My Name
My Address"
94
posted on
10/23/2003 9:56:58 PM PDT
by
Tauzero
(Avoid loose hair styles. When government offices burn, long hair sometimes catches on fire.)
To: Tauzero
CBS comment line:
212-975-4321
Listen to the whole message, there is an opportunity to leave a comment at the end.
Pass the word.
95
posted on
10/23/2003 10:06:57 PM PDT
by
Az Joe
To: Stultis
bttt
To: Stultis
Matthews started out confirming that not one of these Reagan experts had been consulted or contacted by the creators of the miniseries.What? Barbra Streisand and her puppet husband don't count as "experts" on Reagan?/sarcasm
Seriously, this is what it will take. When even those with liberal political sentiments debunk this as trash, CBS sponsors may start to soften. It's a waste of time to talk to CBS -- only the sponsors matter. (That's how the Left "got" Dr. Laura.)
97
posted on
10/23/2003 11:39:01 PM PDT
by
Exigence
To: Steve_Seattle
Chris is one liberal who can be counted on to be fair once in a while. I agree to an extent, though I almost fell off my chair listening to Matthews that evening. He does sometimes stand up against stereotypes, but only rarely and usually only those for whom he has an ethnic identity. More usually, he is in the forefront of perpetuating stereotypes including current myths about Bush's lies.
98
posted on
10/25/2003 7:28:08 AM PDT
by
OESY
To: Exigence
It's a waste of time to talk to CBS -- only the sponsors matter.And the local affilliates. I'm calling mine, in Dallas/Ft. Worth, next week and asking them not to air this trash.
From the clips, promos and stills I've seen it appears that the openly hostile nature of this pseudo-bio-pic is embedded in the lighting, makeup, music, actors' expressions/demeanor and etc. It doesn't look like it will be possible to "fix" it just by editing out the most egregiously offensive scenes.
99
posted on
10/25/2003 2:38:47 PM PDT
by
Stultis
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-99 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson