Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sean Hannity has a scoop on dem party corruption (Vanity)
Sean Hannity radio show ^ | 11/04/03 | Unknown Democrat (via Sean Hannity)

Posted on 11/04/2003 1:27:18 PM PST by jocon307

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 761-780781-800801-820821-835 next last
To: Mo1
Were you able to catch her on Leno? She was positively great! LOL

She wouldn't even discuss the Dims with Leno! Bwahahaha! Shows her good sense by acknowleging that there's really nothing at all to be said about them, which is what Leno followed up with. LOL!

I love Barbara Bush.

Prairie
781 posted on 11/04/2003 9:25:16 PM PST by prairiebreeze (Brought to you by The American Democratic Party, also known as Al Qaeda, Western Division.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 778 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze
She comes on here in a few minutes

We had the elections here in Philly and everything is on delay
782 posted on 11/04/2003 9:31:49 PM PST by Mo1 (http://www.favewavs.com/wavs/cartoons/spdemocrats.wav)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 781 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg
Thanks for the heads up!
783 posted on 11/04/2003 9:41:31 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 552 | View Replies]

To: XJarhead
Beware of anybody who uses "motive" as an accusation. It was Stalin who boasted that he could win every debate if he could switch the arguement to "motivation." By implying bad motives like greed and revenge, you can "discover" that the opposition has been saying one thing while thinking another. Who's to prove you wrong? It's all mind-reading, but it appeals to well-coached "victims."

The weird thing is the Dems' gift for "projection." They probably, actually think he's lying, that he's power-hungry and greedy, because that's what they are. They know whereof they speak and they can make a good case for it. They can really read minds.

784 posted on 11/04/2003 10:22:47 PM PST by Starbreed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
Did Sean say the leaker was connected to the committee?

Returned to this thread very late tonight so this has probably been answered, but Sean said his leaker was a MEMBER of the committee!

785 posted on 11/04/2003 10:26:07 PM PST by truthkeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 350 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze; All
Yes she was and the 4 yr old that came on after her is such a cutie

OK .. I'm off to bed .. here are more emails if anyone needs them


CBS Evening News
evening@cbsnews.com

The Early Show
earlyshow@cbs.com

Face the Nation with Bob Schieffer
ftn@cbsnews.com

CBS News Sunday Morning
sundays@cbsnews.com

The Saturday Early Show
FACSIMILE: (212) 975-6699 or -5996
SAT@cbsnews.com

Weekday Mornings
uttm@cbs.com

48 Hours
48hours@cbsnews.com
786 posted on 11/04/2003 10:31:00 PM PST by Mo1 (http://www.favewavs.com/wavs/cartoons/spdemocrats.wav)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 781 | View Replies]

To: retrokitten
"SUMMARY: Intelligence issues are clearly secondary to the public's concern regarding the insurgency in Iraq."



This committee's job is the intelligence gathering information of the country and is their primary mission - It is certainly not seconday to the public's concern regarding what happened to get us in there. They should be addressing the needs of our inttelligence gathering capabilities to make our nation stronger and more secure.

Indicating that "Intelligence Issues are secondary" is close to..... if not...... criminal. This is not a matter of opinion, but the definitions of the missions of all these comittees we have.

Someone WILL resign.... this will go to the ethics comittee for teir investigation, and I HOPE that the FBI and/or CIA become involved. I doubt the information the intelligence agency heads are providing are thought for one minute to be used in such a political way.

This will NOT die out in a day or two.

B.
787 posted on 11/04/2003 10:31:18 PM PST by bart99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: streetpreacher
""SUMMARY: Intelligence issues are clearly secondary to the public's concern regarding the insurgency in Iraq"



And the mission of the Intelligence Comittee is what?? Clearly not one to strengthen our information collection so that we might be stronger, smarter, and safer. Let's just go after the political angle instead?

Again - THIS part of the meo is more telling than all the rest. "Intelligence Issues are clearly secondary..."??? Please - why is this committee even in existence if that isn't it's PRIMARY role.
788 posted on 11/04/2003 11:10:45 PM PST by bart99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 437 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
Well stated. I agree!!!
789 posted on 11/04/2003 11:17:31 PM PST by bart99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 488 | View Replies]

To: CometBaby
It is mentioned several places now - NewsMax got it immediately, several other articles posted here.

As I said on the other posts - I expect the Republicans to act on this. This is planned sabotage of Bush when they should be working on protecting this country.

Taxpayers should not have to pay for this stupid nonsense. It is hard enough for America to survive in this world without having to fight wars against outsiders and against Americans too.

I also don't want this group having access to our security information - because - apparently they are not in the same war we are. And, I better not hear more about that - "we have to build a bridge" nonsense from Roberts. He needs to quit worrying about being friends with the democrats who are using him and realize his president is being attacked from his committee and they are using him to do it.

I'm mad!!!!!!
790 posted on 11/05/2003 1:11:27 AM PST by ClancyJ (It's just not safe to vote Democratic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 779 | View Replies]

To: tgslTakoma
Yes, I heard his stupid comments. This sounds like a Hillary stunt to me. This was not something from a low level staffer - this was from a member of the committee.

This is a mite more serious than Trent Lott's misspeak - this is plotting against the president during a war from within a top security committee. No way this senator should retain his seat. He is not doing the job he was put there to do - instead he is sabotaging the administration elected to protect this nation.

791 posted on 11/05/2003 1:17:28 AM PST by ClancyJ (It's just not safe to vote Democratic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 780 | View Replies]

To: autoresponder; Miss Marple; sweetliberty; potlatch; PhilDragoo; yall


792 posted on 11/05/2003 2:35:07 AM PST by MeekOneGOP (Check out the Texas Chicken D 'RATS!: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/keyword/Redistricting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 603 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo; Mo1; prairiebreeze
I watched Roberts last night.....the man lacks balls.

They rolled him once......and they will roll him again.......just watch.

793 posted on 11/05/2003 4:03:06 AM PST by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 652 | View Replies]

To: TaxRelief
The Ballad of Senator Pat and the Rats
(Sung to the tune of Beverly Hillbillies)

...Even Colmes who was on the other s i d e,
Couldn't make him see the Rats weren't bonafide....

-----------------------------------------------------

LOL!!! Very good ballad there, Tax Relief! : )

794 posted on 11/05/2003 4:05:09 AM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 747 | View Replies]

To: Dog; Mo1; prairiebreeze
They rolled him once......and they will roll him again.......just watch.

I agree.

795 posted on 11/05/2003 4:08:20 AM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 793 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
Roberts is going to build bridges back to the RATS.....so they can roll him again.

His reaction last night on H&C was very telling.....if I was one of his advisors I would tell not to do any more interviews.....until he can feint outrage.

ED on Fox is outraged by this.....she said this reaks..

796 posted on 11/05/2003 4:09:14 AM PST by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 794 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo; Mo1
ED on Fox is on fire...

She is right......don't mess with the publics safety...

797 posted on 11/05/2003 4:10:50 AM PST by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 795 | View Replies]

To: Dog
ED was great. I hope they come back to this topic and keep hammering it. Wonder if CSpam will cover the Repubbies response on the Senate floor today?

Prairie
798 posted on 11/05/2003 4:19:15 AM PST by prairiebreeze (Brought to you by The American Democratic Party, also known as Al Qaeda, Western Division.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 797 | View Replies]

To: Dog
Dog have you heard any other news outlets even mentioning this story? Cnn or MSNBC?

Prairie
799 posted on 11/05/2003 4:20:07 AM PST by prairiebreeze (Brought to you by The American Democratic Party, also known as Al Qaeda, Western Division.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 797 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze
Nope.
800 posted on 11/05/2003 4:21:23 AM PST by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 799 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 761-780781-800801-820821-835 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson