Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Reagan won again ("You don't want to alienate white, middle-aged, middle America.")
Sydney Morning Herald ^ | November 6, 2003

Posted on 11/05/2003 6:51:46 AM PST by dead

An American TV network has bowed to political pressure and pulled a mini-series about the Reagans. Gerard Wright writes on the unprecedented move.

His authorised biographer once heard Ronald Reagan say of the viral scourge known as AIDS, which was then sweeping the United States: "Maybe the Lord brought down this plague" because "illicit sex is against the Ten Commandments".

In the process of filtration and osmosis by which literary fact becomes docudrama script, the observation that President Ronald Reagan made to his biographer Edmund Morris became this on-screen rebuttal to his wife Nancy's plea to help AIDS sufferers: "Those that live in sin will die in sin."

Political act ... a TV depiction of the Reagans starring
James Brolin and Judy Davis has run into static.

This stark and unlovely side of a beloved president was to have been shown as a telemovie on the CBS network on November 16 and 18, the height of the ultra-competitive autumn ratings period. "Was" is the operative word. CBS yesterday bowed to mounting political pressure from the Republican Party and said it had pulled the mini-series, and would instead broadcast it to a vastly reduced audience on its cable TV sibling, Showtime.

This is believed to be the first time in the 60-year history of American broadcasting that a network has changed its programming in this way in response to concerted political opposition. CBS claimed its actions were in the interests of quality control, rather than as a reaction to any political heat.

"This decision is based solely on our reaction to seeing the final film, not the controversy that erupted around a draft of the script," the network said.

"I don't know of any other time that this has happened," said Dr Tony Silvio, a journalism professor at the University of Rhode Island. "It's interesting that just the threat of a boycott of advertisers was enough to do it."

The four-hour mini-series, starring James Brolin as Ronald Reagan and Judy Davis as his wife Nancy, purports to be a dramatised biography of the Reagans' 45-year relationship. For American conservatives, who, through the Reagan Legacy Project, want to either install or re-label monuments and public landmarks in Reagan's name in each of the more than 3000 US counties, aspects of the biography have amounted to slander of an icon.

Compounding the felony was the fact that the 92-year-old Reagan, who announced nine years ago that he was afflicted with Alzheimer's disease and is now rarely seen in public, is unable to defend himself.

One conservative group wrote to 100 leading TV advertisers asking them not to support the movie. A lawyer who started an anti-CBS website claimed to have received 50,000 emails supporting his cause.

It is clear that CBS did not see the storm coming. When it leaked a copy of the script and a seven-minute film excerpt of the movie last month, the network said it was trying to tell a historically accurate story that would draw its source material favourable to the Reagans or otherwise from respected biographies and other source material, including a profile of Nancy Reagan by her former speechwriter.

The script has Reagan co-operating with the FBI in the investigation of Hollywood identities who would later be blacklisted for supposed communist affiliation of the early 1950s. Thirty years later, it allows him to claim most of the credit for ending the Cold War.

Davis's Nancy Reagan is presented as a control freak who set the president's schedule based on the advice of an astrologer.

"It's not painted in black and white," said producer Craig Zadan of the Reagans' life, "but in blacks, whites and greys, many variations of grey."

It was those variations that troubled the truest believers. That and the fact that the variations were painted by their ideological arch-enemies, the so-called "Hollywood liberals".

In that respect, the non-conservative credentials of the cast and crew of The Reagans were impeccable. Brolin is the husband of Barbra Streisand, a liberal activist and Democratic Party supporter. Davis, in a public appearance in Sydney last month, spoke out for the Sydney Peace Prize winner, the Palestinian activist Hanan Ashrawi.

Craig Zadan and co-producer Neil Meron were the producers of the Oscar-sweeping Chicago, as well as several made-for-TV movies. The website 365gay.com describes Zadan and Meron as "openly gay".

In the cultural war that dominates US public life, this particular battle was a resounding win for the conservative forces that rallied behind the Reagans.

"It shows that the concerns that the Reagan family and supporters have raised since the news of this mini-series broke were warranted," said Mike Wintemute, a California Republican Party spokesman. "All of the indications that I have seen of the script of the Reagans' life is that it had been fictionalised."

To Silvio, CBS was guilty of only misreading its core audience: white, middle-aged middle America: "Those are people that you don't want to alienate." Beyond the strategic issue, however, Silvio said there was a matter of larger concern.

"The question is not that this is economic censorship, although that is a genuine concern. I find the actions of Viacom (the parent company of CBS and Showtime) a little cowering, maybe a lot cowering, but that's the reality of the TV business today."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: thereagans
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 11/05/2003 6:51:47 AM PST by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dead
His authorised biographer once heard Ronald Reagan say of the viral scourge known as AIDS, which was then sweeping the United States: "Maybe the Lord brought down this plague" because "illicit sex is against the Ten Commandments".

Does anyone even know that this is an actual quote or something Morris made up with his fictous third-person story-teller.

In the process of filtration and osmosis by which literary fact becomes docudrama script, the observation that President Ronald Reagan made to his biographer Edmund Morris became this on-screen rebuttal to his wife Nancy's plea to help AIDS sufferers: "Those that live in sin will die in sin."

Even assuming the first quote was accurate, Reagan was just pondering the possibility that maybe it was something God did to discourage homosexuality, it was not a basis for Reagan's actions as the fictious quote implies. The evidence clearly shows Reagan was compassionate towards those with AIDS and was very progressive in trying to calm people's fears about the spread of AIDS.

2 posted on 11/05/2003 7:02:09 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead
...This is believed to be the first time in the 60-year history of American broadcasting that a network has changed its programming in this way in response to concerted political opposition...

Right. And Dr. Laura was canceled because of her poor radio ratings.

3 posted on 11/05/2003 7:03:20 AM PST by Sgt_Schultze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead
CBS yesterday bowed to mounting political pressure from the Republican Party and said it had pulled the mini-series, and would instead broadcast it to a vastly reduced audience on its cable TV sibling, Showtime.

Nice spin. The Republican Party did nothing to pressure CBS. Instead, a massive grassroots uprising from conservative Americans who were outraged at the smear campaign scared the sponsors who were probably backing out left and right.

4 posted on 11/05/2003 7:19:32 AM PST by VRWCmember (We apologise for the fault in the taglines. Those responsible have been sacked.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWCmember
Well said, I was going to make the same point.

There is also another point brought out in an article yesterday about this "mini-series" is that, according to one SeeBS talking head, 'The Reagans' was supposed to be a story about their 45 year love affair and, as the talking head noted, "it got out of control".

No kidding.
5 posted on 11/05/2003 7:44:10 AM PST by DustyMoment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dead
Does this tell you anything about the SeeBS motive for their Reagan miniseries (100% political):

Birth Name: James Bruderlin
Birthdate: July 18, 1941
Birthplace: Los Angeles, CA
Occupations: Actor, Director
Significant Other(s):
Wife: Barbra Streisand, actress, director, singer; married July 1, 1998, in Malibu, California

6 posted on 11/05/2003 7:51:05 AM PST by Happy2BMe (Nurture terrorism in a neighborhood near you - donate to your local community mosque.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
James Brolin -- a mediocre actor at best, but I liked him in "Westworld."
7 posted on 11/05/2003 8:01:29 AM PST by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dead
CBS = Constant BS
8 posted on 11/05/2003 8:22:50 AM PST by Grampa Dave ("If you don't like change, you're going to like irrelevance even less.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
The evidence clearly shows Reagan was compassionate towards those with AIDS and was very progressive in trying to calm people's fears about the spread of AIDS.

Well, if Reagan said the 'living in sin' bit to a biographer, then putting the words in his mouth in a miniseries isn't as far off the wall as I thought.  The real hoot here is the straight-faced concern on this board for compassion towards AIDS sufferers.  This has the gravitas of termite testicles.
9 posted on 11/05/2003 8:53:33 AM PST by gcruse (http://gcruse.typepad.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
Well, if Reagan said the 'living in sin' bit to a biographer, then putting the words in his mouth in a miniseries isn't as far off the wall as I thought.

Reagan didn't say 'living in sin' or 'dying in sin'. The alledged quote in the non-biography just says illecit sex is against the Ten Commandments. Are you gonna argue that illecit sex isn't against the Ten Commandments? The context is completely different than saying Reagan thought people 'should die in sin'. Reagan was not that hateful or arrogant.

BTW, my point about Morris's biography is that since Morris is using a fictious character's point of view, is Morris putting words into Reagan's mouth or is this something that was actually said. We really don't know.

10 posted on 11/05/2003 9:08:58 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: gcruse; Always Right
The real hoot here is the straight-faced concern on this board for compassion towards AIDS sufferers. This has the gravitas of termite testicles.

Interesting. What is your agenda..I mean point.. gcruse?

Well, if Reagan said the 'living in sin' bit to a biographer, then putting the words in his mouth in a miniseries isn't as far off the wall as I thought.

Are you trying to miss the point? That is the only explaination for something this circularly ridiculous. Reagan did not say the 'living in sin' quote, which was one of the many reasons this hit piece was innaccurate. What I find "odd" about you gcruse is that you would say that Reagan did say this, then claim that the docudrama was correct in also quoting it. What exactly are you trying to pull here?

11 posted on 11/05/2003 9:22:19 AM PST by PeoplesRep_of_LA (Treason doth never prosper, for if it does, none dare call it treason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: PeoplesRep_of_LA
I didn't know this, but the docudrama is executive-produced by openly gay producers Craig Zadan and Neil Meron. I was just doing a google search for Morris's quote and that little reported fact was stated on a gay website.
12 posted on 11/05/2003 9:42:58 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
Here is even a gay activist making the same point:

The Reagan record is open to criticism, but using slander to bolster one's case smacks of cheap leftwing propaganda. And the fact that defenders of the series cite Edmund Morris's biography "Dutch" without noting that this book was roundly castigated for mixing fact with totally fictitious dialog and characters (and phony footnotes) certainly doesn't inspire trust is what the series presents as "truth."

13 posted on 11/05/2003 9:55:39 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
Yes I learned that too from Al Rantle out here about a month ago who has longed criticized these producers. This entire project is basically a Gaystapo production from the beginning. It is their "interpretation" or characture of Reagan that they are so comfortable with they didn't realize that the tired propoganda of Reagan being a dumb, hatefilled fool controled by an overbearing woman would be challenged outside of their community.

Zadan and Meron didn't realize that their time as Ministers of Propoganda has passed. No one lost more in this than they did, and no one deserved to lose more than them. You are right, the reality that they are part of the Radical Left of the gay community narrowing in on AIDS and other conjecture as part of his important and complex 8 years was nothing more than an infantile attempt to marginalize him to advance their status. Sucks to be them today.

14 posted on 11/05/2003 9:55:48 AM PST by PeoplesRep_of_LA (Treason doth never prosper, for if it does, none dare call it treason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: PeoplesRep_of_LA
If Reagan said that to a biographer, then having him mouth the same sentiments in a TV drama isn't as off the wall as I first thought.
15 posted on 11/05/2003 11:02:35 AM PST by gcruse (http://gcruse.typepad.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
I don't entirely disagree. But the original impression was that the sentiment had been made up out of whole cloth. Apparently, that isn't entirely true, either.
16 posted on 11/05/2003 11:04:13 AM PST by gcruse (http://gcruse.typepad.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
If Reagan said that to a biographer, then having him mouth the same sentiments in a TV drama isn't as off the wall as I first thought.

If Reagan said what? The two statements are mutual exclusive.

17 posted on 11/05/2003 11:06:26 AM PST by PeoplesRep_of_LA (Treason doth never prosper, for if it does, none dare call it treason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
I don't entirely disagree. But the original impression was that the sentiment had been made up out of whole cloth. Apparently, that isn't entirely true, either.

Whatever. There was no intellectual integrity in the quote of the script. Both the words and the sentiment were completely made up. If you wish to defend such lies, go ahead. It doesn't say much about your character though.

18 posted on 11/05/2003 11:19:15 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
Your idea of character and mine are quite different, I think.
My idea of character is to take facts into account and make
reasonable judgements, regardless of whose feet are in the
fire. It's hard to do sometimes, but it's harder to put what
I want to believe ahead of what rationality tells me.
19 posted on 11/05/2003 11:55:47 AM PST by gcruse (http://gcruse.typepad.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Sgt_Schultze
There was a show on very briefly called "The Secret Life of Desmond Pfeiffer" about a black man who was butler (and key advisor to) Abraham Lincoln. This show got canned because of political pressure from the so-called civil rights groups, so the Sydney Morning Herald doesn't know what it's talking about.
20 posted on 11/05/2003 12:21:26 PM PST by jpl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson